| ACUCISETM
ENDOPYELOTOMY IN A PORCINE MODEL: PROCEDURE STANDARDIZATION AND ANALYSIS
OF SAFETY AND IMMEDIATE EFFICACY
(
Download pdf )
CÁSSIO ANDREONI
(1), MIGUEL SROUGI (1), VALDEMAR ORTIZ (1), RALPH V. CLAYMAN (2)
(1) Division
of Urology, Federal University of São Paulo, SP, Brazil, and (2)
Division of Urology, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
The study here presented was done to test the technical reliability and
immediate efficacy of the Acucise device using a standardized technique.
Materials and Methods: 56 Acucise procedures
were performed in pigs by a single surgeon who used a standardized technique:
insert 5F angiographic catheter bilaterally up to the midureter, perform
retrograde pyelogram, Amplatz super-stiff guidewire is advanced up to
the level of the renal pelvis, angiographic catheters are removed, Acucise
catheter balloon is advanced to the ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) level,
the super-stiff guide-wire is removed and the contrast medium in the renal
pelvis is aspirated and replaced with distilled water, activate Acucise
at 75 watts of pure cutting current, keep the balloon fully inflated for
10 minutes, perform retrograde ureteropyelogram to document extravasation,
remove Acucise catheter and pass an ureteral stent and remove guide-wire.
Results: In no case did the Acucise device
present malfunction. The electrocautery activation time was 2.2 seconds
(ranging from 2 to 4 seconds). The extravasation of contrast medium, visible
by fluoroscopy, occurred in 53 of the 56 cases (94.6%). In no case there
was any evidence of intraoperative hemorrhage.
Conclusions: This study revealed that performing
Acucise endopyelotomy routinely in a standardized manner could largely
preclude intraoperative device malfunction and eliminate complications
while achieving a successful incision in the UPJ. With the guidelines
that were used in this study, we believe that Acucise endopyelotomy can
be completed successfully and safely in the majority of selected patients
with UPJ obstruction.
Key
words: kidney pelvis; ureter; ureteral obstruction; Acucise catheter;
surgical procedures, minimally invasive
Int Braz J Urol. 2004; 30: 59-65
INTRODUCTION
Retrograde
endopyelotomy by ureteroscopy or by Acucise catheter was recently reported
as being the most cost-effective treatment for ureteropelvic junction
obstruction (UPJO) (1). However, Acucise endopyelotomy has been reported
in the literature as a risky procedure, due to either perioperative hemorrhage
or technical complications in 0 - 36% of cases (2-11).
Technical complications include the fracture
of the cutting wire inside the patient, balloon obstruction, and the inability
of advancing the device to the level of the ureteropelvic junction (UPJ)
(2).
To test the technical reliability of the
Acucise device, 56 Acucise procedures were performed in pigs by a single
surgeon who used a standardized technique.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
After
the study protocol was approved by the Animal Studies Committee at Washington
University School of Medicine in St. Louis, USA, 28 domestic sows were
submitted to bilateral endopyelotomy with the Acuciseä device (Applied
Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA).
The pigs were submitted to a 16-hour oral
fasting period. Next, a pre-anesthetic xylazine (1 mg/kg), telazol (1
mg/kg) and ketamine (1 mg/kg) solution was injected intramuscularly using
a 20-gauge needle. Atropine sulphate (0.06 mg/kg) and sodium ceftiofur
(ceftiofurato sódico) (3.0 - 5.0 mg/kg) were also administered
intramuscularly. Intravenous access was performed and hydration with a
saline solution was commenced (2 mL/kg weight/hour). Anesthesia was maintained
throughout the procedure with 1.5 to 2.5% isoflorane; the animals’
arterial pressure, heart rate and oxygenation were monitored continually.
After general anesthesia, the animals were
placed in the dorsal lithotomy position. A cystogram was performed in
order to identify vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Flexible cystoscopy was
performed and the ureteral orifices were identified; under fluoroscopic
guidance, a 5F angiographic catheter was inserted bilaterally up to the
midureter and retrograde pyelograms were done (Figure-1). If the collection
system appeared normal, then an Amplatz super-stiff (0.035”) (Microvasive,
Natick, MA) guidewire was inserted into each angiographic catheter, and
advanced up to the level of the renal pelvis. The angiographic catheters
were then removed. Over the super-stiff guidewire, the Acucise catheter
balloon was advanced to the UPJ level. The proximal third of the Acuciseä
device was left in the renal pelvis and the distal two-thirds in the proximal
ureter. With the Acucise device cutting wire turned laterally (Figure-2),
as determined fluoroscopically, the super-stiff guidewire was removed
and the contrast in the renal pelvis was aspirated and replaced with distilled
water. If further visualization of the UPJ area was needed, then dilute
nonionic contrast was used. The Acucise device was activated at 75 watts
of pure cutting current and the balloon was filled with 2 cc of contrast.
Activation of the cutting wire was continued throughout the inflation
cycle, which required no more than 5 seconds. After 10 minutes with the
balloon fully inflated to provide tamponade (Figure-3), the Acuciseä
catheter was emptied and pulled back to the middle portion of the ureter.
A retrograde ureteropyelogram was performed through the Acuciseä
catheter in order to document the extravasation of the contrast through
the previously incised area (Figure-4). After this, the Acucise catheter
was removed and a 7F 20 cm ureteral stent (Percuflex®, Microvasive,
Natick, MA) was introduced over the super-stiff guidewire under fluoroscopic
control. The proximal portion of the stent was positioned in the upper
renal pole. After the correct positioning of the stent was confirmed via
fluoroscopic images, the guidewire was removed and a 14F Foley catheter
was placed in the bladder. The main steps of the Acucise endopyelotomy
procedure are listed in the appendix.
If contrast extravasation was not observed,
an 8/10F Amplatz dilator/sheath system was passed over the super-stiff
guidewire. The 8F dilator was removed and a floppy tip guidewire was introduced
into the 10F sheath alongside the super-stiff guidewire; the 10F sheath
was removed. A flexible ureteroscope was passed over the guidewire up
to the incision level; the guidewire was then removed. Under ureteroscopic
view, the UPJ incision was observed and if peri-ureteral fat was seen,
the flexible ureteroscope was withdrawn and a stent was placed, as previously
described, over the super-stiff guidewire. If no incision was seen, then
the cutting wire running over the Acucise balloon was cleaned with the
back edge of a surgical knife, removing all of the charred material on
it and the balloon was cleaned with repeated injection and aspiration
of distilled water. The Acucise device was reintroduced and the entire
procedure was repeated. The Acucise device was never reactivated during
the same procedure without its having been removed and cleaned.
Intra-operative hemorrhage was evaluated
in terms of hemodynamic stability, by the presence of bruising in the
flank, presence of a palpable mass, and subjectively through the interpretation
of the color of the urine. The presence of clots in the urine was felt
to represent significant bleeding that would require further therapy to
control.
Appendix
The 10 steps
of the Acucise endopyelotomy:
1. Cystoscopy with ureteral orifices identification.
2. Insert 5F angiographic catheter bilaterally up to the midureter.
3. Perform retrograde pyelogram.
4. Amplatz super-stiff (0.035”) guidewire is inserted into the angiographic
catheter, and advanced up to the level of the renal pelvis.
5. Angiographic catheters are removed.
6. Acucise catheter balloon is advanced to the UPJ level: proximal third
is left in the renal pelvis and the distal two-thirds in the proximal
ureter.
7. The super-stiff guidewire is removed and the contrast in the renal
pelvis is aspirated and replaced with distilled water.
8. Activate Acucise at 75 watts of pure cutting current (cutting for no
more than 5 seconds).
9. Keep the balloon fully inflated for 10 minutes, then empty the balloon,
pull it and perform retrograde ureteropyelogram to document extravasation.
10. Remove Acucise catheter keeping the guide-wire in place, pass an ureteral
stent, and remove guide-wire.
RESULTS
A
total of 56 retrograde endopyelotomies were performed by the same surgeon
(C.A.) using the Acucise device. The average weight of the animals was
50.2 Kg (ranging form 40 to 65 Kg). On average, the procedure to complete
bilateral Acucise incisions lasted 46 minutes (ranging from 35 to 85 minutes).
The procedure was completed successfully in all cases. All animals survived
the procedure.
Device
Function
In no case did the Acucise device present
a malfunction. In one case, the device was activated accidentally while
it was still outside of the animal; it still functioned well when placed
inside the animal. In all cases, the passage of the Acucise device over
the super-stiff guidewire up to the UPJ was achieved with no difficulty.
In 4 cases, access to the UPJ had to be obtained first with a Terumo hydrophilic
guidewire, as the super-stiff guidewire did not progress to the renal
pelvis. In these cases, a 5F angiographic catheter was passed over the
Terumo guidewire, following which the Terumo guidewire was removed and
a super-stiff guidewire was then passed through the 5F angiographic catheter
and then coiled in the renal pelvis. The 5F catheter was then removed
and the procedure was performed as described. The electrocautery activation
time was 2.2 seconds (ranging from 2 to 4 seconds). The area that was
charred on the electrocautery wire was measured immediately after the
procedure and it was 17.5% (ranging from 3.3% to 40%).
Intra-Operative
Success
The extravasation of contrast, visible by
fluoroscopy, occurred in 53 of the 56 cases (94.6%). In the 3 cases without
extravasation, flexible ureteroscopy revealed no incision and the Acucise
device was replaced and reactivated, as described. This resulted in successful
extravasation in all 3 cases.
Intra-Operative
Hemorrhage
In no case was there any evidence of intraoperative
hemorrhage. All animals remained hemodynamically stable; there was neither
flank bruising nor a palpable mass in any of the animals. After the procedure,
urine color was evaluated subjectively: clear urine in 28.6% (8 of 28)
of the cases, pink urine in 67.8% (19 of 28) of the cases, and reddish
urine without clot formation in 3.6% (1 of 28) of the cases.
The double-J ureteral catheter was introduced
successfully in all animals, however, in 2 cases; a 22 cm stent had to
be placed due to the length of the ureter.
COMMENTS
In
this series, we successfully performed 56 consecutive Acucise endopyelotomies
in a porcine model without finding any device malfunction or any intraoperative
complications, including significant bleeding. However, the pig may be
a less severe model than the clinical situation since the pig ureter has
less surrounding fat. Also, the UPJ area in all of the animals was presumably
normal and unaffected by crossing vessels. Nonetheless, the standard technique
described seemed to largely preclude technical problems with the device
and was effective in providing a satisfactory incision in nearly 95% of
cases. We have no explanation for the 3 initially unsuccessful cases;
however, in all 3 a second placement and activation was successful.
A potential problem may be the activation
of the electrocautery at an inappropriate moment through inadvertent operation
of the cautery pedal. This may be done by the surgeon himself, by an assistant,
or perhaps even by someone circulating in the room. To avoid this problem,
the electrosurgical machine should be placed on stand-by until the surgeon
is ready to make the incision. Immediately after the incision is made,
the electrosurgical unit should be placed back into a stand-by mode. Also,
the surgeon must check to make sure that the electrosurgical machine is
set on pure cutting current and never coagulation or blend current. Either
of the latter would not only preclude an incision but would likely also
result in scarring at the UPJ.
Passing the Acucise device all the way up
into the collecting system seems to facilitate rotation of the catheter,
thereby making it easier to put the cutting wire into a directly lateral
position. Also, draining the contrast and urine from the renal pelvis
and replacing it with distilled water and nonionic contrast, if needed,
may be an important factor since urine and ionic contrast solutions conduct
electricity thereby decreasing the concentration of the electrosurgical
current at the site of the cutting wire. Lastly, remaining faithful to
the 10-minute balloon inflation period at 24F after cutting wire activation
is another fundamental point, since the 24F Acucise balloon may tamponade
smaller vessels and minimize post-operative bleeding.
The preferred treatment for UPJO has always
been open dismembered pyeloplasty, with success rates above 90% (12-17).
Endoscopic treatments are represented by the antegrade or retrograde endopyelotomy
(EP). Antegrade endopyelotomy is performed through a percutaneous renal
access, while the retrograde EP may be done with the Acucise catheter
or through ureteroscopy, either a rigid ureteroscope with a cold knife
or electrosurgical probe or a flexible ureteroscope with a Holmium laser
or electrosurgical probe. Regardless of the endopyelotomy technique, for
primary UPJ obstruction, a lateral incision at the UPJ is done in the
impaired area to reduce the chance of bleeding (18).
The advantages of endopyelotomy techniques
over open surgery include less intense post-operative pain, less hospitalization
time and a quicker return to normal activities (3). However, the endopyelotomy
techniques classically present a lower success rate, ranging from 70 to
89% (8,19-22). Recently, several factors that impact negatively on endopyelotomy
have been identified. While controversial, these are generally thought
to include any of the following: a) The presence of anterior crossing
vessels; b) Grade III or IV hydronephrosis; c) An area of stenosis >
1cm in length and d) Renal function of the affected kidney of < 20%.
In one study, using selective criteria for the application of endopyelotomy,
a success rate of 92.8% was reported with an average follow-up period
of 54 months (23,24).
Among the options for treating UPJ obstruction,
according to a recent survey in the United States, the preferred methods
were open surgery (43%) and Acucise endopyelotomy (42%) (25). However,
Acucise endopyelotomy continues to be questioned in the literature due
to concerns over adverse effects (2,23). The post-Acucise endopyelotomy
transfusion rate ranges from 1 - 9%; among these patients, nearly half
required embolization and there have been cases of nephrectomy performed
for ongoing bleeding. There have been no deaths from Acucise endopyelotomy
reported in the literature to date (2). We believe that much of these
problems are truly avoidable and indeed, since using a lateral direction
for deploying the cutting guidewire, we have seen only one episode of
bleeding over the past 5 years. Similarly, Kim and associates have noted
no subsequent episodes of bleeding after adopting a policy of directing
the cutting wire laterally (11,18). In addition, the use of spiral CT
scans has largely eliminated the use of the Acucise device in the face
of crossing vessels, thereby further increasing its safety (18). Also,
the suggestions in this article have all but eliminated device malfunction
in our experience. Finally, it is important to realize that the current
Acucise device is smaller (i.e. 10F over the balloon portion) than the
original device which was used by investigators who reported some of the
higher incidences of bleeding or device malfunction. Also in those earlier
experiences, the incision was routinely being made posterolateral and
the presence and location of crossing vessels was not known preoperatively
(18).
CONCLUSIONS
This
study revealed that performing Acucise endopyelotomy routinely in a standardized
manner could largely preclude intraoperative device malfunction and eliminate
complications while achieving a successful incision in the UPJ. We emphasize
factors such as delivering the device over a super-stiff guide wire, replacing
urine/contrast medium in the renal pelvis with water/nonionic contrast,
making a lateral incision, activation of the electrosurgical current for
the least time possible, avoiding inadvertent reactivation by keeping
the electrosurgical device on stand-by mode, keeping the Acucise balloon
inflated at 24F for 10 minutes after making the incision, and device reactivation
only after refurbishing the device by removing char and cleaning the balloon.
With these guidelines, we believe that Acucise endopyelotomy can be completed
successfully and safely in the majority of selected patients with UPJ
obstruction.
REFERENCES
- Gettman MT, Lotan Y, Roerhborn CG, Cadeddu JA, Pearle MS: Cost-effective
treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a decision tree analysis.
J Urol. 2003; 169: 228-32.
- Schwartz BF, Stoller ML: Complications of retrograde balloon cautery
endopyelotomy. J Urol. 1999; 162: 1594-98.
- Brooks, JD, Kavoussi LR, Preminger GM, Schuessler WW, Moore RG: Comparison
of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic
junction. Urology. 1995; 46: 791-5.
- Cohen TD, Gross MB, Preminger GM: Long-term follow-up of balloon
cautery incision of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology. 1996;
47: 317-23.
- Faerber GJ, Richardson TD, Farah N, Ohl DA: Retrograde treatment
of ureteropelvic junction obstruction using the ureteral cutting balloon
catheter. J Urol. 1997; 157: 454-8.
- Gelet A, Combe M, Ramackers JM, Ben Rais N, Martin X, Dawahra M,
et al: Endopyelotomy with the Acucise cutting balloon device. Early
clinical experience. Eur Urol. 1997; 31: 389-93.
- Nakada SY, Pearle MS, Clayman RV: Acucise endopyelotomy: evolution
of less-invasive technology. J Endourol. 1996; 10: 133-9.
- Preminger GM, Clayman RV, Nakada SY, Babayan RK, Albala DM, Fuchs
GJ, et al.: A multi-center clinical trial investigating the use of a
fluoroscopically controlled cutting balloon catheter for the management
of ureteral and ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol. 1997; 157:
1625-9.
- Nadler RB, Rao GS, Pearle MS, Nakada SY, Clayman RV: Acucise endopyelotomy:
assessment of long-term durability. J Urol. 1996; 156: 1094-7.
- Gill HS, Liao JC: Pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction treated with
Acucise retrograde endopyelotomy. Br J Urol. 1998; 82: 8-11.
- Kim FJ, Herrell SD, Jahoda AE, Albala DM: Complications of Acucise
endopyelotomy. J Endourol. 1998; 12: 433-6.
- Persky L, Krause JR, Boltuch RL: Initial complications and late results
in dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol. 1977; 118: 162-5.
- Foley FEB: A new plastic operation for stricture at the ureteropelvic
junction: report of 20 operations. J Urol. 1937; 38: 643.
- Scardino PL, Prince CL: Vertical flap ureteropelvioplasty preliminary
report. South Med J. 1953; 46: 325-31.
- Nguyen DH, Aliabadi H, Ercole CJ, Gonzalez R: Nonintubated Andreson-Hynes
repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in 60 patients. J Urol.
1989; 142: 704-6.
- Lowe FC, Marshall FF: Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults.
Urology. 1984; 23: 331-5.
- O’Reilly PH, Brooman PJ, Mak S, Jones M, Pickup C, Atkinson
C, et al.: The long-term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU
Inter. 2001; 87: 287-9.
- Sampaio FJ, Favorito LA: Ureteropelvic junction stenosis: vascular
anatomical background for endopyelotomy. J Urol. 1993; 150: 1787-91.
- Motola J, Badlani G, Smith A: Results of 212 consecutive endopyelotomies:
an 8-year follow-up. J Urol. 1993; 149: 453-56.
- Tawfiek ER, Liu JB, Bagley DH: Ureteroscopic treatment of ureteropelvic
junction obstruction. J Urol. 1998; 160: 1643-6.
- Thomas R, Monga M, Klein E: Ureteroscopic retrograde endopyelotomy
for management of ureteropelvic obstruction. J Endourol. 1996; 10: 141-5.
- Shalhav AL, Giusti G, Elbahnasy AM, Hoenig DM, McDougall EM, Smith
DS, et al.: Adult endopyelotomy: impact on etiology and antegrade versus
retrograde approach on outcome. J Urol. 1998; 160: 685-9.
- Pardalidis NP, Papatsoris AG, Kosmaoglou EV: Endoscopic and laparoscopic
treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol. 2002; 168:
1937-40.
- Van Cangh PJ, Wilmart JF, Opsomer RJ, Abi-Aad A, Wese FX, Lorge F:
Long-term results and late recurrence after endoureteropyelotomy: a
critical analysis of prognostic factors. J Urol. 1994; 151: 934-7.
- Kim HL, Hollowell CM, Patel RV, Balles GT, Clayman RV, Gerber GS:
Use of new technology in endourology and laparoscopy by American urologists:
internet and postal survey. Urology. 2000; 56: 760-5.
_________________________
Received: November 19, 2003
Accepted: December 12, 2003
_______________________
Correspondence address:
Dr. Cassio Andreoni
Rua Jesuino Arruda, 60 / 201
São Paulo, SP, 04532-080, Brazil
Fax: + 55 11 3237-2758
E-mail: c.andreoni@attglobal.net |