| RESINIFERATOXIN
FOR DETRUSOR INSTABILITY REFRACTORY TO ANTICHOLINERGICS
(
Download pdf )
PAULO C.R. PALMA,
MARCELO THIEL, CÁSSIO L.Z. RICCETTO, MIRIAM DAMBROS, RICARDO MIYAOKA,
N. RODRIGUES NETTO JR
Division
of Urology, State University of Campinas, UNICAMP, Campinas, São
Paulo, Brazil
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
We have evaluated the clinical and urodynamic effects of intravesical
instillation of resiniferatoxin in patients with idiopathic detrusor instability
refractory to anticholinergics.
Materials and Methods: There were 30 women,
median age 56 years old with detrusor instability for over 6 months and
a history of anticholinergic use with no response or intolerable collateral
effects. A 50 nM solution of resiniferatoxin was prepared for intravesical
instillation. All patients were evaluated for urinary symptoms, as well
as for urodynamic assessments before and 30 days after instillation. Tolerability
was analyzed during the instillation.
Results: A clinical improvement was observed
in 30% of the patients with urinary urgency and in 33% of the patients
with urge-incontinence. The mean maximum cystometric capacity before application
was 303.9 ± 78.9 and after application 341 ± 84.6. No significant
difference was observed (p = 0.585). The mean maximum amplitude of the
contractions diminished from 47.86 ± 29.64 to 38.72 ± 30.77
(p = 0.002).
Conclusions: Resiniferatoxin, in this concentration,
proved to be useful in a small percentage of patients regarding clinical
detrusor instability. Maximum amplitude of the involuntary contractions
was significantly reduced and in 33% patients the involuntary contractions
disappeared. Further studies with different concentrations are recommended.
Key
words: bladder; urodynamics; urination disorders; bladder instillations;
toxins
Int Braz J Urol. 2004; 30: 53-8
INTRODUCTION
Detrusor
instability (DI) is responsible for lower urinary tract symptoms and it
is characterized by involuntary contractions of the detrusor during the
filling phase of the bladder, during urodynamic assessment (1). These
contractions have been attributed to neurogenic (2,3) or myogenic (4)
alterations and, recently, the focus has been on C sensory fibers (2)
and atropine (3) resistant parasympathetic transmitters. Anticholinergics
have been used as first line treatment, despite the side effects (5).
Recently, experimental studies have demonstrated that a substance isolated
from the euphorbia species, a common cactus found in Morocco, presents
pharmacological activity in detrusor instability. It is known as resiniferatoxin
(RTX), an analogue of capsaicin but a thousand times more potent (6).
RTX seems to interfere in the non-myelinized C fibers responsible for
the micturition reflex in patients with medullar lesions. It has very
little effect on the myelinized delta A fibers present in the pelvis and
responsible for transmitting sensorial information to the encephalic center
in normal individuals (7). RTX has a homovanylic ring in its structure
its biological activity is able to treat some lower urinary tract functional
disorders (8). Lastly, evidence exists indicating that involuntary detrusor
contractions also depend on C fiber mediated micturition reflex, since
lidocaine instillation reduces these contractions (9). Lidocaine is a
potent C fiber inhibitor and less potent in the case of A delta fibers.
As this anesthetic improves involuntary contractions in patients with
detrusor instability, it has been suggested that this type of nerve fiber
contributes to the etiology of this disease (9).
RTX was effective in reducing the frequency,
urgency and incontinence episodes in patients with detrusor hyperreflexia.
As it did not produce anatomic dysreflexia episodes in spinal cord trauma
patients, it proved to be a good alternative in such patients (10,11).
Since RTX has been successfully used in patients with detrusor hyperreflexia,
it could also be effective in the treatment of detrusor instability.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
A
prospective cohort study was conducted comprising 30 women, median age
56 years-old (age range 24 to 88) with urodynamic proven detrusor instability
for more than 6 months and unsuccessful use of anticholinergics for at
least 40 days or severe collateral effects. All the patients underwent
urine test to rule out urinary tract infection. This study received the
approval of the Hospital Ethics Committee for research in humans.
All patients underwent a work-up for DI
that included history and physical examination, so that patients with
neurological, cardiovascular, renal, hepatic and psychiatric disorders
as well as those patients with malignant diseases or pregnant patients
could be excluded from the study.
RTX was supplied in 1 mg packages by Sigma
Company. They were diluted into 10 mM stock solutions in pure ethanol
and conserved in dark flasks at 4°C. This solution was then utilized
to prepare the required volumes in the following manner: 9.5 mL of pure
ethanol, 90 mL of 0.9% saline solution and 0.5 mL of RTX, producing a
50 nM solution in 10% ethanol using the saline solution as a vehicle.
This solution was prepared just before each instillation. A 14F Foley
catheter was used for intravesical instillation of the medication and
left in the bladder for 30 minutes. Patients were asked about pain and
the intensity of these symptoms was analyzed using a visual analogical
scale. Zero meaning no discomfort and 10 indicating unbearable sensation.
All patients were asked about urinary symptoms
on the 30th day following the instillation.
Cystometry was performed before and 30 days
after RTX instillation. The same researcher performed all the urodynamic
tests. A double lumen 8F catheter (one lumen for saline infusion rate
of 50 mL/min and other to measure the intravesical pressure) and a 4F
rectal catheter-balloon to measure abdominal pressure were used.
The cystometric parameters evaluated were
maximum cystometric capacity, maximum amplitude of the involuntary contractions
and the presence of urgency or urinary leakage during these contractions.
The influence of intravesical instillation
of RTX was accessed by comparing the results of the various parameters
utilizing McNemar’s test and the Wilcoxon rank sum test for non-parametric
samples. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
No
significant difference was observed in urinary frequency after treatment.
Nevertheless, in 3 cases, the condition worsened and an improvement was
observed in 5 cases (Table-1).
Urgency was present in 90% of the patients,
and decrease to 60% after RTX instillation (Table-2).
Urge-incontinence was present in 83.33%
of the patients, and decrease to 50% after RTX instillation (Table-3).
Resiniferatoxin instillation produced no
significant changes in nocturia and enuresis.
Supra-pubic pain also did not improve significantly
because 60% reported pain before treatment and 46.67% after treatment
(p = 0.134). The urodynamic examination before and after RTX treatment
did not demonstrate significant alterations of urinary leakage during
involuntary contractions (p = 0.077).
Despite the fact, no statistically significant
difference regarding maximum cystometric capacity was noted (p = 0.585),
this finding may be related to the fact that 6 patients presented reduction
in bladder capacity post RTX instillation.
The histograms in Figure-1 demonstrate the
distribution of the patients before and after RTX instillation for maximum
cystometric capacity.
The mean maximum cystometric capacity pre-instillation
was 303.9 ± 78.9 and post instillation 341 ± 84.6.
There were significant differences between
the maximum amplitude of the involuntary contractions before and after
treatment. The mean pre-instillation was 47.86 ± 29.64 cm H2O and
post instillation was 28.72 ± 30.77 cm H2O (p = 0.0002). The mean
reduction was 40%. In 33.33% the involuntary contractions disappeared.
The histograms of Figure-2 demonstrate the
distribution of contraction amplitude before and after RTX.
DISCUSSION
Resiniferatoxin
is a potent agonist of type 1 vanilloid receptors in rats and humans (12).
These receptors are localized on the dorsal ganglionar neurons (12). A
study has demonstrated that the increase in bladder volume triggered the
first contraction due to the attachment of RTX to the type 1 receptors
in the C fibers (7). However, it is not known if desensitization or degeneration
of the nerve endings of the bladder wall occurs. It was suggested that
the C fibers were more responsible than the A delta fibers for the involuntary
contractions. In normal individuals, desensitization of these fibers does
not provoke any reaction (10), but finding out why sensorial information
becomes preponderant in the C fibers may explain the physiopathology of
idiopathic detrusor instability. The increased sensorial information in
the C fibers could be provoked by the liberation of excessive bladder
NGF (nerve growth factor) (13) musculature, also observed in infravesical
obstruction. Although this study suggests the involvement of C fibers
in the etiology of bladder instability, the existence of other abnormalities
cannot be ignored, especially because the same improvement was not observed
in the present study. The fact that the patients were extremely refractory
to any type of treatment or presented bad results with any kind of proposed
medication should obviously be taken into consideration. Nevertheless,
partial improvement was observed with RTX, which reduced symptoms of urgency
in up to 30% of the patients. The reason for the long-term effect of RTX
is still unknown, but may involve the down-regulation mechanism of the
C fiber receptors and of neuropeptides such as substance P and CGRP (14).
There is only one study in literature using
RTX for DI (7). In that study a 50 nM solution of RTX was applied in 13
patients with DI and urodynamic were performed at 30 and 90 days after
instillation. The maximum cystometric capacity and urinary volume at the
first involuntary contraction were measured after instillation. The volume
that triggered off the first contraction increased from a mean of 170
± 109 mL to 440 ± 130 mL during the first 30 days and 90
days. This increase was observed in 92% of a total of 11 women. The maximum
cystometric capacity of the 11 patients (472 ± 139 mL) increased
30 days after instillation, returning to a volume above the initial volume
(413 ± 153 mL) after 90 days. Our findings differ from that data
because there was no difference in maximum cystometric capacity pre and
post RTX. This may be partly because 6 patients presented reduced capacity
after RTX. Silva’s et al. (7) results showed an improvement in 91%
of the incontinent patients, while in our study improvement was observed
in only 33% of the patients, 30 days after instillation. The reason for
these different findings is probably that our patients had more severe
symptoms and were refractory to other treatments. Silva et al (7) used
RTX as first line treatment in no refractory DI patients and this could
be the reason of such difference. The urinary frequency also differed,
it was 9.7 ± 3.2 times a day after 30 days decreasing in relation
to the previous frequency, while in our study 73% of the patients reported
that after instillation they urinated at least once every 2 hours. The
urodynamic parameters in this present study did not demonstrate the significant
change observed in the Silva’s et al (7) study, with the exception
of the amplitude of the involuntary contractions that decreased from 40
± 28.86 to 28.72 ± 30.77 mL. This reduction was noticed
in 25 patients.
These authors reported that there were no
strong complaints during instillation and that the pain score was 3 on
the same analogical scale, similar to the score in this study. Silva and
collaborators (7) performed the RTX instillation with urodynamic control
to verify the alterations caused and the innumerous phasic contractions
of the detrusor that began slowly and became more spaced out at the end
of the infusion. They reported that the RTX suppressed or diminished the
involuntary contractions.
CONCLUSIONS
Intravesical
instillation of 50 nM RTX solution clinically improved a small percentage
of patients. The maximum amplitude of the involuntary contractions diminished
significantly, and in 33% patients the involuntary contractions disappeared.
Instillations were well tolerated with no interruption due to pain or
discomfort. Further studies are recommended to access the role of RTX
in this subset of patients.
REFERENCES
- Abrams P, Blaivas JG, Stanton SL, Andersen JT: The standardisation
of terminology of lower urinary tract function. The International Continence
Society Committee on Standardisation of Terminology. Scand J Urol Nephrol
Suppl. 1988; 114: 5-19.
- De Groat WC: A neurological basis for the overactive bladder. Urology.
1997; 50 (suppl. 6A): 36-52.
- O’Reilly B, Kosaka AH, Knight GF, Chang TK, Ford AP, Rymer
JM, et al.: P2X receptors and their role in female idiopathic detrusor
instability. J Urol. 2002; 167: 157-64.
- Brading AF: A myogenic basis for the overactive bladder. Urology.
1997; 50 (suppl. 6A): 57-67.
- Chapple CR: Muscarinic receptor antagonists in the treatment of overactive
bladder. Urology. 2000; 55 (suppl. 5A): 33-46.
- Szallasi A, Blumberg PM: Resiniferatoxin and analogs provide novel
insights into the pharmacology of the vanilloid receptor. Life Sci.
1990; 47: 1399-408.
- Silva C, Ribeiro MJ, Cruz F: The effect of intravesical resiniferatoxin
in patients with idiopathic detrusor instability suggests that involuntary
detrusor contractions are triggered by C-fiber input. J Urol. 2002;
168: 575-9.
- Szallasi A, Conte B, Goso C, Blumber PM, Manzini S: Vanilloid receptors
in the urinary bladder: regional distribution, localization on sensory
nerves, and species-related differences. Naunyn schmiedebergs arch pharmacol
[Multi]. 1993; 347: 624.
- Yokoyama O, Komatsu K, Kodama K, Yotsuyanagi S, Niikura S, Namiki
M: Diagnostic value of intravesical lidocaine for overactive bladder.
J Urol. 2000; 164: 340-3.
- Lazzeri M, Beneforti P, Turini D: Urodynamic effects of intravesical
resiniferatoxin in humans: preliminary results in stable and unstable
detrusor. J Urol. 1997; 158: 2093-6.
- Cruz F, Guimarães M, Silva C, Reis M: Supression of bladder
hyperreflexia by intravesical resiniferatoxin. Lancet. 1997; 350: 640-1.
- Hayes P, Meadows HJ, Gunthorpe MJ, Harries MH, Duckworth DM, Cairns
W, et al.: Cloning and functional expressions of a human orthologue
of rat vanilloid receptor-1. Pain. 2000; 88: 205-215.
- Steers WD: Rat: overview and innervation. Neurourol Urodyn. 1994;
13: 97-118.
- Avelino A, Cruz C, Nagy I, Cruz F: Vanilloid receptor 1 expression
in the rat urinary tract. Neuroscience. 2002; 109: 787-98.
__________________________
Received:
September 24, 2003
Accepted: October 20, 2003
_______________________
Correspondence
address:
Dr. Marcelo Thiel
Rua Barão de Jaguara, 601 / 122
Campinas, SP, 13015-001, Brazil
Fax: + 55 19 3233-6016
E-mail: thiel7@uol.com.br
|