|
IMAGING
Angiomyolipoma
with minimal fat on MDCT: can counts of negative-attenuation pixels aid
diagnosis?
Simpfendorfer C, Herts BR, Motta-Ramirez GA, Lockwood DS, Zhou M, Leiber
M, Remer EM
Section of Abdominal Imaging, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland,
OH, USA
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 192: 438-43
- Objective:
The purpose of this study was to determine whether counts of pixels
with subzero attenuation on CT scans can aid in the diagnosis of renal
angiomyolipoma with minimal fat.
-
Materials and Methods:
Of 33 angiomyolipomas identified among 719 renal masses resected from
702 patients over 4 years, 15 masses in 15 patients were prospectively
diagnosed on the basis of the presence of fat at MDCT. The 18 patients
with minimal-fat angiomyolipoma and a matched (age, sex, tumor size)
cohort of patients with renal cell carcinoma were included in this study.
Three radiologists independently counted the number of pixels with attenuation
less than -10, -20, and -30 HU. Receiver operating characteristic analysis
of the number of pixels at each cutoff was used to calculate sensitivity,
specificity, and positive predictive value with the following criteria:
1, more than 10 pixels less than -20 HU; 2, more than 20 pixels less
than -20 HU; 3, more than 5 pixels less than -30 HU.
-
Results: Using
criterion 1, reader A identified six angiomyolipomas; reader B, five;
and reader C, two. The combined sensitivity was 24%; specificity, 98%;
and positive predictive value, 69%. Using criterion 2, reader A identified
three angiomyolipomas; reader B, four; and reader C, two. The combined
sensitivity was 17%; specificity, 100%; and positive predictive value,
100%. Using criterion 3, reader A identified four angiomyolipomas; reader
B, four; and reader C, two. The combined sensitivity was 18%; specificity,
100%; and positive predictive value, 100%.
-
Conclusion: CT
findings of more than 20 pixels with attenuation less than -20 HU and
more than 5 pixels with attenuation less than -30 HU have a positive
predictive value of 100% in detection of angiomyolipoma, but most angiomyolipomas
with minimal fat cannot be reliably identified on the basis of an absolute
pixel count.
- Editorial
Comment
Adequate preoperative imaging characterization of small angiomyolipoma
(AML) is essential since 3-7% of suspicious renal masses resected are
found to be AML. AML is characterized by the presence of variable amount
of fat within a renal mass. From the practical point of view (evidence
based medicine), all renal mass containing fat are considered AML. The
use of thin-section (2-5 mm) unenhanced CT is the best method for detecting
even small amounts of fat. Previous reports have been shown that if
fat within a mass is not visually obvious, pixel mapping can be performed,
which may reveal the fat as clustered pixels with negative CT numbers
(defined as at least 3 adjacent pixels with attenuation -20 HU) (1).
The drawbacks of these previous reports are lack of pathologic confirmation
and absence of a control group. The authors of this manuscript found
that in a study with pathologic correlation the CT findings of more
than 20 pixels with attenuation less than -20 HU and more than 5 pixels
with attenuation less than -30 HU have a positive predictive value of
100% in detection of angiomyolipoma. These AMLs presented at pathologic
examination more than 10% of fat.
AMLs containing less than 10% of fat at pathologic examination could
not be characterized on the basis of an absolute pixel count. Perhaps,
for the sake of clarity, we should call AMLs with minimal fat those
with tiny amount of visible fat and those in which only CT pixel mapping
is able to demonstrate negative attenuation. AMLs with less than 10%
of fat should be called AMLs without radiologic evidence of fat. The
latter category is indistinguishable from renal cell carcinoma and for
this reason, imaging guided percutaneous biopsy is indicated.
Reference
1. Takahashi K, Honda M, Okubo RS, Hyodo H, Takakusaki H, Yokoyama H,
et al.: CT pixel mapping in the diagnosis of small angiomyolipomas of
the kidneys. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1993; 17: 98-101.
Dr.
Adilson Prando
Chief, Department of Radiology and
Diagnostic Imaging, Vera Cruz Hospital
Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
E-mail: adilson.prando@gmail.com |