|
PEDIATRIC
UROLOGY
Antibiotics
and surgery for vesicoureteric reflux: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled
trials
Wheeler D, Vimalachandra D, Hodson EM, Roy LP, Smith G, Craig JC
Centre for Kidney Research and Cochrane Renal Group, NHMRC Centre of Clinical
Research Excellence in Renal Medicine, The Children’s Hospital at
Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Arch Dis Child. 2003; 88: 688-94
- Aims:
To evaluate the benefits and harms of treatments for vesicoureteric
reflux in children.
- Methods:
Meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials using a random effects
model. Main outcome measures were incidence of urinary tract infection
(UTI), new or progressive renal damage, renal growth, hypertension,
and glomerular filtration rate.
- Results:
Eight trials involving 859 evaluable children comparing long term antibiotics
with surgical correction of reflux (VUR) and antibiotics (seven trials)
and antibiotics compared with no treatment (one trial) were identified.
Risk of UTI by 1-2 and 5 years was not significantly different between
surgical and medical groups (relative risk (RR) by 2 years 1.07; 95%
confidence interval (CI) 0.55 to 2.09, RR by 5 years 0.99; 95% CI 0.79
to 1.26). Combined treatment resulted in a 60% reduction in febrile
UTI by 5 years (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.70) but no concomitant significant
reduction in risk of new or progressive renal damage at 5 years (RR
1.05; 95% CI 0.85 to 1.29). In one small study no significant differences
in risk for UTI or renal damage were found between antibiotic prophylaxis
and no treatment.
-
Conclusion:
It is uncertain whether the identification and treatment of children
with VUR confers clinically important benefit. The additional benefit
of surgery over antibiotics alone is small at best. Assuming a UTI rate
of 20% for children with VUR on antibiotics for five years, nine reimplantations
would be required to prevent one febrile UTI, with no reduction in the
number of children developing any UTI or renal damage.
- Editorial
Comment
This paper reviews randomized controlled trials of children with vesicoureteral
reflux. Only eight trials were felt to be adequate for analysis. Nonetheless,
the conclusion that the authors reach is that there are few differences
in the results of antibiotic treatment vs. surgical treatment. Indeed,
the only difference demonstrated was a 60% reduction is febrile UTI
at 5 years. The authors calculate that 9 to 17 children would require
antireflux surgery to prevent one UTI during the five-year follow-up.
If indeed there is limited benefit, the authors intimate that even voiding
cistourethrograms (VCUG) may not be needed. All children could be treated
with antibiotics. Furthermore, the only study that reviews the results
of no antibiotic treatment for patients with reflux showed no significant
differences between groups. If this data holds up, it is conceivable
that no VCUG would be needed in these children and no antibiotics would
be necessary except for treatment of acute UTI.
On the other hand, the paper also documents the weaknesses in those
trials. The studies all have significant problems. Even accounting for
the weaknesses of the studies of medical vs. surgical management, it
is likely that longer follow-up would show an even larger difference
in febrile UTIs. Similarly, longer follow-up might well show benefits
of antibiotic use in children with reflux, as the single study reported
had only 29 children and 14 months of follow-up. It seems that the main
point of this manuscript is that more studies are needed to obtain scientific
data that enable optimal decision-making.
Dr.
Barry A. Kogan
Chief and Professor of Urology and Pediatrics
Albany Medical College
Albany, New York, USA
|