| MALE
INFERTILITY IN SPINAL CORD TRAUMA
(
Download pdf )
CRISTIANO UTIDA,
JOSE C. TRUZZI, HOMERO BRUSCHINI, ROGERIO SIMONETTI, AGNALDO P. CEDENHO,
MIGUEL SROUGI, VALDEMAR ORTIZ
Department
of Urology, Paulista School of Medicine, Federal University of Sao Paulo,
UNIFESP, and Section of Urology, San Francisco Home School, Sao Paulo,
Brazil
ABSTRACT
Every
year there are 10 thousand new cases of patients victimized by spinal
cord trauma (SCT) in the United States and it is estimated that there
are 7 thousand new cases in Brazil. Eighty percent of patients are fertile
males. Infertility in this patient group is due to 3 main factors resulting
from spinal cord lesions: erectile dysfunction, ejaculatory disorder and
low sperm counts. Erectile dysfunction has been successfully treated with
oral and injectable medications, use of vacuum devices and penile prosthesis
implants. The technological improvement in penile vibratory stimulation
devices (PVS) and rectal probe electro-ejaculation (RPE) has made such
procedures safer and accessible to patients with ejaculatory dysfunction.
Despite the normal number of spermatozoa found in semen of spinal cord-injured
patients, their motility is abnormal. This change does not seem to be
related to changes in scrotal thermal regulation, frequency of ejaculation
or duration of spinal cord damage but to factors related to the seminal
plasma. Despite the poor seminal quality, increasingly more men with SCT
have become fathers through techniques ranging from simple homologous
insemination to sophisticated assisted reproduction techniques such as
intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
Key
words: spinal cord injuries; semen; infertility, male; ejaculation;
paraplegia
Int Braz J Urol. 2005; 31: 375-83
INTRODUCTION
In
the United States, there are approximately 300,000 patients with sequelae
from spinal cord trauma (SCT), and there are a reported 10,000 new cases
every year (1). In Brazil, an estimated 7 thousand new cases occur every
year. Approximately 80% of the affected patients are males of reproductive
age. Men with SCT often present fertility problems related to the neurological
lesion. This patient group faces 3 main problems concerning this issue
(1-5): first, erectile dysfunction, where both medical and surgical treatment
has provided a high resolution index; second, ejaculatory dysfunction,
present in up to 90% of the cases and requiring the use of resources for
inducing semen release; and finally, low sperm counts. The number of spermatozoa
in the ejaculate of spinal cord-injured patients is generally within normal
ranges. However, motility is low, approximately 20% as compared to the
70% rate usually found in healthy patients. Infertility among spinal cord-injured
patients usually results from the sum of all these factors. This present
report aims to provide a critical analysis of each involved factor, the
pathophysiology and the currently available treatment modalities.
ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION
The
change of erectile quality in the spinal cord-injured patient is directly
related to the lesion level and the extent of impairment. Two components
act together in the erectile physiology: the reflex and the psychogenic
components (6). The reflex component is induced by tactile stimulation
of the genital organs; impulses run through the pudendal nerve (somatic
innervation) until they reach the sacral erection center. The parasympathetic
nuclei are activated and erection is achieved through the cavernous nerves.
On the other hand, psychogenic stimulation results from audio-visual or
imaginary stimuli and depends on the modulation of the spinal erection
centers (T11-L2 and S2-S4). In order to activate the erection process,
cerebral impulses are transmitted through the sympathetic (inhibiting
norepinephrine release), parasympathetic (releasing nitric oxide and acetylcholine)
and somatic (releasing acetylcholine) tracts.
When the lesion occurs at the sacral level,
the psychogenic erection component is preserved but the reflex mechanism
is not. Under these circumstances, the cerebral stimulus is transmitted
through sympathetic fibers thus inhibiting the norepinephrine release,
while acetylcholine and nitric oxide are released through synapses existing
in somatic and postganglionic parasympathetic neurons. When compared with
sacral fibers, the lower number of synapses between thoracic-lumbar fibers
and postganglionic parasympathetic neurons results in partial erection.
In patients with spinal cord lesion above the T9 level, psychogenic erection
is usually absent (1,6).
Treatment
of Erectile Dysfunction
The first step consists of orientating the
patient about the impact of SCT on sexual dysfunction and the types of
erection he can possibly achieve.
Before treatment, it is fundamental that
patients be instructed to empty their bladders prior to initiating the
sexual stimulation. This maneuver aims to avoid the occurrence of autonomic
dysreflexia (AD) (7,8).
Therapeutic options for erectile dysfunction
(9-20) in these patients include the use of oral medication, intracavernous
injection, vacuum devices and penile prostheses. The selection of the
type of treatment depends on adaptation and individual response to the
selected modality, though it should always start with the less invasive
methods.
Sildenafil, an oral medication introduced
in the market approximately 6 years ago, is a potent inhibitor of type-5
phosphodiesterase (PDE5), responsible for degradation of cyclic guanosine
monophosphate (cGMP). Sildenafil enhances the relaxing effect of nitric
oxide (NO) released in response to sexual stimulation by increasing cGMP
concentrations in the cavernous body. This results in increased penile
rigidity and tumescence. Success rates among spinal cord-injured patients
range from 75 to 94% (10-12). For the majority of writers, the best results
are achieved by patients with partial neurological damage. On the other
hand, Sanchez Ramos et al. (11) demonstrated that there was no difference
in the response to medication when comparing either the severity of neurological
impairment or the level of spinal cord lesions. Adverse effects resulting
from Sildenafil use among patients with SCT do not differ from those observed
in the general population and range from 10 to 42%. Headaches (17%) and
face rubor are among the most frequent side effects (12). Tadalafil and
vardenafil, 2 other inhibitors of phosphodiesterase that have been more
recently used, produce effects similar to Sildenafil in spinal cord-injured
patients (9,10,13).
Apomorphine, a dopaminergic agonist, acts
by stimulating the D2 receptors in the paraventricular nucleus of the
hypothalamus. This activates pro-erectile central pathways involving NO
and oxytocin, thus leading to erection (10,14). The only study on the
efficacy of apomorphine for erectile dysfunction in spinal cord-injured
patients was performed by Strebel et al. (14). Only 2 out of 22 patients
presented satisfactory erections following the use of sublingual apomorphine.
Intracavernous injections of vasoactive
substances provide a success rate of 95%, defined by achievement of an
erection suitable for penetration (15,16). Treatment should start with
low dosing due to the risk of priapism (papaverine 7.5 mg, or prostaglandin
E1 2µg). In addition to priapism, other potential complications
for this treatment modality include penile excoriation, infection and
fibrosis of the cavernous body.
Vacuum devices (17,18) promote an increase
in penile blood flow due to the negative pressure they generate. Once
the erection is obtained, a constriction ring is placed at the base of
the penis. Patients should not keep this ring in place for more than 30
minutes due to the risk of ischemic penile damage. Denil et al. (17) assessed
20 patients with SCT using vacuum devices. After 3 months, 93% of the
men reported proper erections, but this index decreased to 41% after 6
months, with the most frequent complaint being early loss of erection
rigidity. Its use is contraindicated in patients with blood dyscrasias,
or those using anticoagulants due to complications such as ecchymoses,
skin edema and abrasions.
The implantation of a penile prosthesis
(19) is usually the last therapeutic option, and is attempted when all
previously described techniques have failed. There is a wide range of
materials and models that adapt to each patient’s condition and
needs. Semi-rigid prostheses have the advantage of easy implantation,
a low mechanical failure rate and low cost. The disadvantages are that
the penis remains constantly in an erect position, in addition to presenting
a higher risk of penile erosion. Inflatable prostheses promote an appearance
more resembling that of a normal erection, however their implantation
is more laborious and costs are quite high. In patients with SCT, the
penile prosthesis aims also to assist in the management of urinary incontinence,
making the adaptation of external penile collectors easier (20). Kimoto
& Iwatsubo (20) assessed 82 spinal cord-injured patients. Follow-up
time ranged from 1 to 10 years (mean 4 years) and obtained a satisfaction
rate of 64% for sexual function and 93% for adaptation of the urine collector.
Complications occurred in 13.3% of cases, with the most frequent being
extrusion of the prosthesis and cavernous infection.
EJACULATORY
DYSFUNCTION
Ejaculatory
dysfunction is one of the main factors for infertility in patients victimized
by SCT (1,3-5,21). In 1948, Horne et al. (3) reported that ejaculation
was present in only 18% of the 84 patients under study whose spinal cord
trauma occurred above the sacral level. Talbot (4) assessed 408 patients
and found an even lower value – only 10% of reported antegrade ejaculation.
Normal ejaculatory function, a primarily
sympathetic phenomenon, consists in a complex and coordinated sequence
of striated and smooth muscular contractions, which results in the antegrade
emission and expulsion of sperm. The dorsal nerve of the penis transmits
the afferent impulse produced by the tactile stimulation through the pudendal
nerve to the cerebral centers. The efferent stimulus follows, occurring
through the anterolateral column of the spinal cord until it reaches the
sympathetic ganglionic chain (T10 to L2), the hypogastric plexus anterior
to the aorta. Short postganglionic fibers divide into branches and reach
the prostate, vasa deferentia and seminal vesicles. Adrenergic neurons
stimulate the emission of sperm into the posterior urethra, while the
bladder neck closes simultaneously, which prevents retrograde ejaculation.
Through the somatic innervation (S2-S4), involuntary contractions of the
periurethral musculature (bulbocavernous and ischiocavernous muscles)
and the pelvic floor cause the expulsion of seminal fluid through the
distal urethra distal, thus completing the ejaculatory event.
Methods
for Assisted Ejaculation
Penile vibratory stimulation (PVS) and rectal
probe electro-ejaculation (RPE) are methods currently used for this purpose
(3,22-27). The vibratory stimulation was first reported by Sobrero et
al. (23) in 1965 as a method for inducing ejaculation in humans. In PVS,
a vibratory device is placed in contact with the glans and frenulum preputii
in order to stimulate ejaculation. Devices with high-amplitude movement
(> 2.5 mm) have shown better results when compared with low amplitude
devices (< 2.5 mm), with success rates of 60% to 80% and 30% to 40%
respectively (28,29). Since it is a non-invasive method, the process can
be used at home by the patient himself, with no need for medical assistance.
Due to the low local tactile sensitivity, patients should be instructed
towards intermittent and non-prolonged use to avoid penile damage. The
PVS shows better results in men with spinal cord lesion located above
the thoracic-lumbar efferent center (T10-L2); that is, when the ejaculatory
reflex arc remains intact.
Electro-ejaculation was described by Horne
et al. (3) in 1948 and is used in cases where PVS fails. It has a higher
success rate than PVS – about 90% to 100%. It consists in introducing
a rectal probe and applying direct electric stimulation on the sympathetic
efferent fibers of the hypogastric nerve through the anterior rectal wall.
The procedure is usually well tolerated and only 5% of patients require
sedation or anesthesia for reducing the discomfort. Inadvertent damage
to rectal mucosa can occur, and the performance of rectosigmoidoscopy
before and after the procedure is routinely recommended. An additional
disadvantage is the fact that the procedure’s execution is restricted
to outpatient/hospital regimen and provides low quality semen (30) (Table-1).
In the presence of retrograde ejaculation,
pH changes and potential infections make the vesical environment hostile
to the ejaculate, thus demanding urine alkalinization 24-48 hours before
the procedure. For this, sodium bicarbonate is orally administered the
day before surgery, or a conservative medium, such as modified human tubal
fluid (HTF), is instilled into the bladder after its emptying. Retrograde
ejaculate is collected by bladder catheterization (24). Patients undergoing
RPE or PVS and with lesions located above the T6 level are more susceptible
to autonomic dysreflexia and require continuous monitoring or previous
prophylaxis, such as administration of 20 mg of nifedipine 15 minutes
before performing the procedure (31).
Alternative methods, such as sperm aspiration
from the epididymis or testis by microsurgery or puncture, can be used
as well (MESA - microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration, PESA - percutaneous
epididymal sperm aspiration, TESE - testicular sperm extraction, TESA
- testicular sperm aspiration). They have the inconvenience of obtaining
a small seminal volume and a low number of spermatozoa in relation to
ejaculate, and these methods are reserved for cases with obstructive azoospermia
or when both PVS and RPE have failed (32,33).
SPERM QUALITY
The
quality of the ejaculate is yet another additional obstacle for patients
with SCT, even following successful sperm collection by the several methods
described above. Despite the absence of agreement among authors, the number
of spermatozoa in spinal cord-injured patients is believed to be normal
and, contrary to the previous thinking, there is no progressive decline
over the years following trauma if the men have proper urological follow-up.
Brackett et al. (34) conducted one study with 125 patients victimized
by SCT. They analyzed spermiograms collected at intervals of 1 to 12 weeks,
with an average of 5 samples per patient, over 24 months. This study found
no differences in the concentration, total number and motility of spermatozoa
in the ejaculate in relation to the time lapsed. However, other authors
have reported increased sperm fragility, low motility (mean of 20% in
comparison with 70% in healthy patients) and the presence of necrospermia.
No correlation was demonstrated between these findings and the lesion
level, patient’s age, time since the trauma, or frequency of ejaculations
(35,36). The exact moment where the seminal quality starts to decline
is still an issue for further investigation; however, it can possibly
occur during the first months following the spinal cord lesion. It is
difficult to assess the patients during the acute phase of SCT because
they lack the emotional and physical conditions that would allow them
to participate in assisted reproduction procedures. Brackett et al. (35)
described a low success index in assisted ejaculation for patients at
less than 1 year from the trauma, and once the semen was obtained, there
was a small amount of spermatozoa, making the assessment difficult during
the acute period. In a prospective study, Mallidis et al. (37) assessed
7 men with SCT and identified a decline in semen quality starting 16 days
after SCT, thus recommending seminal cryopreservation in the acute phase.
Padron et al. (38) found that the effects of sperm freezing were similar
both in healthy patients and those with SCT; that is, there was decreased
motility ranging from 60% to 80% after thawing. Due to the inferior seminal
quality in spinal cord-injured patients, there is no apparent advantage
with routine seminal cryopreservation in this group of patients. The process
would be indicated in specific cases, such as the patient’s personal
wish, difficulty of transporting the ejaculate to the assisted reproduction
centers, or limitations in time coordination between sample collection
and use (33).
Causes
of Low Sperm Quality
The main hypotheses formulated to explain
the low sperm quality in spinal cord-injured patient are increase in scrotal
temperature, aggression resulting from methods used in bladder emptying,
infrequent ejaculations, altered hormonal environment, leukospermia, urinary
tract infections and factors in seminal plasma that regulate sperm motility
(39-57).
Scrotal
Temperature
The similarity in seminal changes observed
among patients with SCT has stimulated the search for common factors that
could explain them. The increase in scrotal temperature is basically due
to a scrotal thermoregulatory change by the autonomic nervous system and
to the long periods which such patients remain seated in wheelchairs.
Early studies have established a correlation between the increase in scrotal
temperature and the low motility of spermatozoa. Wang et al. (39) identified
an initial scrotal temperature 1.2º C higher among spinal cord-injured
patients compared to the control group. On the other hand, Brackett et
al. (40) analyzed 66 patients with SCT and 21 controls and did not identify
any differences in scrotal temperature or in seminal quality.
Frequency
of Ejaculation
Siosteen et al. (41) reported an increase
in seminal volume and the total number of motile spermatozoa in 16 patients
who presented repeated ejaculations for a period of 4 to 6 months. On
the other hand, Sonksen et al. (36) did not identify any changes in seminal
quality when assessing 19 patients for a 1-year period on a weekly PVS
program.
Method
of Urinary Bladder Drainage
Rutkowski et al. (42) evaluated the ejaculate
of patients with SCT and identified a better percentage of sperm motility
in patients who used intermittent bladder catheterization compared to
other methods (indwelling bladder catheter and suprapubic drainage), probably
due to the lower rate of urinary infection.
Endocrine
Dysfunction
Normality of the hypothalamus-pituitary-gonad
axis is fundamental for normal sperm production. Brackett et al. (43)
identified a normal hormonal pattern in spinal cord-injured patients.
In turn, Naderi et al. (44) identified decreased LH and FSH levels, suggesting
that this contributed to the seminal changes to some degree. However,
Morton (45) suggested that such changes could be caused by sleep apnea,
which is present in 40% of patients with SCT, and associated with hypogonadotropic
hypogonadism.
Leukospermia
and Urinary Tract Infections
Bacteriuria was described in 60-70% of annual
tests in patients with SCT. Wolff et al. (46) reported the association
between leukospermia and a decrease in the number and motility of spermatozoa.
Ohl et al. (47) have also verified the association between urinary infections
and poorer sperm quality. However, seminal improvement is limited following
treatment, still maintaining lower levels than healthy patients.
Seminal
Plasma
Several authors have investigated the role
of seminal plasma as the cause of poor sperm quality. When mixed with
spermatozoa from normal men, seminal plasma from patients with SCT promotes
a decrease in their motility. Contrarily, the addition of seminal plasma
from normal men improves sperm motility in patients with SCT (48). Spermatozoa
collected from the vas deferens of patients with spinal cord lesions show
higher motility when compared to those obtained from the ejaculate and
seminal vesicles, suggesting that the worsening quality could be associated
with factors that are present in prostate or seminal vesicle secretions
(49,50). Changes in the seminal plasma have been found following SCT installation,
such as reduced levels of fructose levels, albumin, glutamic oxaloacetic
transaminase, alkaline phosphatase and prostate-specific antigen (PSA),
and increased levels of chloride (51,52), reactive oxygen species (ROS)
(53) and cytokine (54,55). The low fructose concentration in the semen
from patients with SCT, which is a major energy source for the spermatozoa,
has been pointed out as a co-factor in asthenospermia. Reactive oxygen
species such as superoxide anion, hydrogen peroxide, peroxyl and hydroxyl
are being correlated with low viability and morphological changes in spermatozoa
(56). High cytokines (54) indicate an immunological ground for infertility.
Cohen et al. (55) reported improvement in sperm motility following cytokine
inactivation by monoclonal antibodies. Anti-sperm antibodies have also
been reported as a potential cause of low seminal quality due to their
high titers in such situations (57).
ASSISTED REPRODUCTION
TECHNIQUES
Due
to their low seminal quality, spinal cord-injured patients undergoing
sperm collection usually require assistance for achieving fecundation
and consequently, fatherhood. Factors that help determine the method to
be employed are the patient’s seminal parameters, their partner’s
age, their wife’s health conditions and the procedure costs. The
most frequently used techniques are intrauterine insemination (IUI), in
vitro fertilization (IVF), gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT) or zygote
intrafallopian transfer (ZIFT) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)
in the oocyte (58).
In IUI, the semen is processed and the spermatozoa
are separated from the seminal plasma. The partner is monitored by ultrasound
or urine tests in order to detect the moment when ovulation occurs. Spermatozoa
are introduced into the uterus through a catheter. The seminal concentration
should be superior to 5.0 x 106/mL following processing so
that the technique can be used. Pregnancy rates oscillated from 8% to
12% per cycle. When seminal concentration is between 2 and 5 million,
IVF, GIFT or ZIFT must be preferred. In IVF, spermatozoa are left with
the ovules and, following fertilization, the embryos are transferred to
the uterus, with pregnancy rates of 20% to 40%. GIFT and ZIFT consist
of transferring gametes or the zygote into the uterine tube. Due to the
procedure’s more invasive nature, they are currently little used.
ICSI is the injection of a single spermatozoon into the ovule, with subsequent
transfer to the maternal uterus following embryo formation. It is indicated
in cases where the previously mentioned methods have failed and in those
where the seminal concentration is lower than 2 X 106/mL. The
success rate (by pregnancy) is also around 20% and 40%. Few studies have
reported pregnancy rates (pregnancy/number of couples), or fecundation
rates (pregnancy/number of pregnancy trials) in spinal cord-injured patients
with assisted reproduction methods, ranging from 32% to 80% (22,25,26,32,59,60-64)
(Table-1).
CONCLUSION
Difficulties
leading the patient with SCT to infertility are being progressively transposed
due to advances in research and technology area. Methods for treating
erectile dysfunction (oral and injectable medication, vacuum devices and
prosthesis) and ejaculatory dysfunction (PVS, RPE, MESA, PESA, TESA and
TESE) have contributed to this. Current studies have tried to establish
factors existing in the seminal plasma as being responsible for the low
sperm quality, even if there are no definitive results as yet. Currently,
assisted ejaculation and reproduction have tried to answer this deficiency
and increase the chances of patients with SCT in reaching their goal of
fatherhood.
REFERENCES
- Monga M, Bernie J, Rajasekaran M: Male infertility and erectile dysfunction
in spinal cord injury: a review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80: 1331-9.
- Munro D, Horne HW, Paull DP: Effect of injury to the spinal cord and
cauda equina on the sexual potency of men. N Engl J Med. 1948; 239:
904-11.
- Horne HW, Paull DP, Munro D: Fertility studies in the human male
with traumatic injuries of the spinal cord and cauda equina. N Engl
J Med. 1948; 239: 959-61.
- Talbot HS: Sexual function in paraplegia. J Urol. 1955; 73: 91-100.
- Linsenmeyer TA: Sexual function and infertility following spinal cord
injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2000; 11: 141-56.
- Lue TF: Physiology of Penile Erection and Pathophysiology of Erectile
Dysfunction and Priapism. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan Jr. ED, Wein
AJ (eds.), Campbell’s Urology, 8th ed. Philadelphia, WB Saunders.
2002; pp. 1591-1610.
- Guttmann L, Whitteridge D: Effects of bladder distension on autonomic
mechanisms after spinal cord injuries. Brain. 1947; 70: 361-404.
- Karlsson AK: Autonomic dysreflexia. Spinal Cord. 1999; 37: 383-91.
- Ramos AS, Samso JV: Specific aspects of erectile dysfunction in spinal
cord injury. Int J Impot Res. 2004; 16 (Suppl 2): S42-5.
- Padma-Nathan H, Giuliano F: Oral drug therapy for erectile dysfunction.
Urol Clin North Am. 2001; 28: 321-34.
- Sanchez Ramos A, Vidal J, Jauregui ML, Barrera M, Recio C, Giner
M, et al.: Efficacy, safety and predictive factors of therapeutic success
with sildenafil for erectile dysfunction in patients with different
spinal cord injuries. Spinal Cord. 2001; 39: 637-43.
- Derry F, Hultling C, Seftel AD, Sipski ML: Efficacy and safety of
sildenafil citrate (Viagra) in men with erectile dysfunction and spinal
cord injury: a review. Urology. 2002; 60 (Suppl 2): 49-57.
- Del Popolo G, Li Marzi V, Mondaini N, Lombardi G: Time/duration effectiveness
of sildenafil versus tadalafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction
in male spinal cord-injured patients. Spinal Cord. 2004; 42: 643-8.
- Strebel RT, Reitz A, Tenti G, Curt A, Hauri D, Schurch B: Apomorphine
sublingual as primary or secondary treatment for erectile dysfunction
in patients with spinal cord injury. BJU Int. 2004; 93: 100-4.
- Bodner DR, Lindan R, Leffler E, Kursh ED, Resnick MI: The application
of intracavernous injection of vasoactive medications for erection in
men with spinal cord injury. J Urol. 1987; 138: 310-1.
- Dietzen CJ, Lloyd LK: Complications of intracavernous injections
and penile prostheses in spinal cord injured men. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
1992; 73: 652-5.
- Denil J, Ohl DA, Smythe C: Vacuum erection device in spinal cord
injured men: patient and partner satisfaction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
1996; 77: 750-3.
- Levine LA, Dimitriou RJ: Vacuum constriction and external erection
devices in erectile dysfunction. Urol Clin North Am. 2001; 28: 335-41.
- Montague DK, Angermeier KW: Penile prosthesis implantation. Urol
Clin North Am. 2001; 28: 355-61.
- Kimoto Y, Iwatsubo E: Penile prostheses for the management of the
neuropathic bladder and sexual dysfunction in spinal cord injury patients:
long term follow up. Paraplegia. 1994; 32: 336-9.
- Master VA, Turek PJ: Ejaculatory physiology and dysfunction. Urol
Clin North Am. 2001; 28: 363-75.
- Rutkowski SB, Geraghty TJ, Hagen DL, Bowers DM, Craven M, Middleton
JW: A comprehensive approach to the management of male infertility following
spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 1999; 37: 508-14.
- Sobrero AJ, Stearns HE, Blair JH: Technique for induction of ejaculation
in humans. Fertil Steril. 1965; 16: 765-7.
- Ohl DA: Electroejaculation. Urol Clin North Am. 1993; 20: 181-8.
- Heruti RJ, Katz H, Menashe Y, Weissenberg R, Raviv G, Madjar I, et
al.: Treatment of male infertility due to spinal cord injury using rectal
probe electro-ejaculation: the Israeli experience. Spinal Cord. 2001;
39: 168-75.
- Nehra A, Werner MA, Bastuba M, Title C, Oates RD: Vibratory stimulation
and rectal probe electro-ejaculation as therapy for patients with spinal
cord injury: semen parameters and pregnancy rates. J Urol. 1996; 155:
554-9.
- Sonksen J, Ohl DA: Penile vibratory stimulation and electro-ejaculation
in the treatment of ejaculatory dysfunction. Int J Androl. 2002; 25:
324-32.
- Sonksen J, Biering-Sorensen F, Kristensen JK: Ejaculation induced
by penile vibratory stimulation in men with spinal cord injuries. The
importance of the vibratory amplitude. Paraplegia. 1994; 32: 651-60.
- Ohl DA, Menge AC, Sonksen J: Penile vibratory stimulation in spinal
cord injured men: optimized vibration parameters and prognostic factors.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996; 77: 903-5.
- Brackett NL, Padron OF, Lynne CM: Semen quality of spinal cord injured
men is better when obtained by vibratory stimulation versus electro-ejaculation.
J Urol. 1997; 157: 151-7.
- Steinberger RE, Ohl DA, Bennett CJ, McCabe M, Wang SC: Nifedipine
pretreatment for autonomic dysreflexia during electro-ejaculation. Urology.
1990; 36: 228-31.
- Hultling C, Rosenlund B, Levi R, Fridstrom M, Sjoblom P, Hillensjo
T: Assisted ejaculation and in-vitro fertilization in the treatment
of infertile spinal cord-injured men: the role of intracytoplasmic sperm
injection. Hum Reprod. 1997; 12: 499-502.
- Amador MJ, Lynne CM, Brackett NL: A guide and resource directory
to male fertility following spinal cord injury/dysfunction. Miami, University
of Miami. 2000; p. 34. (Miami Project to Cure Paralysis).
- Brackett NL, Ferrell SM, Aballa TC, Amador MJ, Lynne CM: Semen quality
in spinal cord injured men: does it progressively decline post-injury?
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998; 79: 625-8.
- Brackett NL, Nash MS, Lynne CM: Male fertility following spinal cord
injury: facts and fiction. Phys Ther. 1996; 76: 1221-31.
- Sonksen J, Ohl DA, Giwercman A, Biering-Sorensen F, Skakkebaek NE,
Kristensen JK: Effect of repeated ejaculation on semen quality in spinal
cord injured men. J Urol. 1999; 161: 1163-5.
- Mallidis C, Lim TC, Hill ST, Skinner DJ, Brown DJ, Johnston WI, et
al.: Collection of semen from men in acute phase of spinal cord injury.
Lancet. 1994; 343: 1072-3.
- Padron OF, Brackett NL, Weizman MS, Lynne CM: Semen of spinal cord
injured men freezes reliably. J Androl. 1994; 15: 266-9.
- Wang YH, Huang TS, Lin MC, Yeh CS, Lien IN: Scrotal temperature in
spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1993; 72: 6-9.
- Brackett NL, Lynne CM, Weizman MS, Bloch WE, Padron OF: Scrotal and
oral temperatures are not related to semen quality of serum gonadotropin
levels in spinal cord-injured men. J Androl. 1994; 15: 614-9.
- Siosteen A, Forssman L, Steen Y, Sullivan L, Wickstrom I: Quality
of semen after repeated ejaculation treatment in spinal cord injury
men. Paraplegia. 1990; 28: 96-104.
- Rutkowski SB, Middleton JW, Truman G, Hagen DL, Ryan JP: The influence
of bladder management on fertility in spinal cord injured males. Paraplegia.
1995; 33: 263-6.
- Brackett NL, Lynne CM, Weizman MS, Bloch WE, Abae M: Endocrine profiles
and semen quality of spinal cord injured men. J Urol. 1994; 151: 114-9.
- Naderi AR, Safarinejad MR: Endocrine profiles and semen quality in
spinal cord injured men. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2003; 58: 177-84.
- Morton A: Endocrine profiles and semen quality in spinal cord injured
men. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2003; 59: 534-5.
- Wolff H, Politch JA, Martinez A, Haimovici F, Hill JA, Anderson DJ:
Leukocytospermia is associated with poor semen quality. Fertil Steril.
1990; 53: 528-36.
- Ohl DA, Denil J, Fitzgerald-Shelton K, McCabe M, McGuire EJ, Menge
AC, et al.: Fertility of spinal cord injured males: effect of genitourinary
infection and bladder management on results of electro-ejaculation.
J Am Paraplegia Soc. 1992; 15: 53-9.
- Brackett NL, Davi RC, Padron OF, Lynne CM: Seminal plasma of spinal
cord injured men inhibits sperm motility of normal men. J Urol. 1996;
155: 1632-5.
- Brackett NL, Lynne CM, Aballa TC, Ferrell SM: Sperm motility from
the vas deferens of spinal cord injured men is higher than from the
ejaculate. J Urol. 2000; 164: 712-5.
- Ohl DA, Menge AC, Jarow JP: Seminal vesicle aspiration in spinal
cord injured men: insight into poor sperm quality. J Urol. 1999; 162:
2048-51.
- Hirsch IH, Jeyendran RS, Sedor J, Rosecrans RR, Staas WE: Biochemical
analysis of electro-ejaculates in spinal cord injured men: comparison
to normal ejaculates. J Urol. 1991; 145: 73-6.
- Lynne CM, Aballa TC, Wang TJ, Rittenhouse HG, Ferrell SM, Brackett
NL: Serum and semen prostate specific antigen concentrations are different
in young spinal cord injured men compared to normal controls. J Urol.
1999; 162: 89-91.
- de Lamirande E, Leduc BE, Iwasaki A, Hassouna M, Gagnon C: Increased
reactive oxygen species formation in semen of patients with spinal cord
injury. Fertil Steril. 1995; 63: 637-42.
- Basu S, Abdalla TC, Ferrel SM, Lynne CM, Brackett NL: Inflammatory
cytokine concentrations are elevated in seminal plasma of men with spinal
cord injuries. J Androl. 2004; 25: 250-4.
- Cohen DR, Basu S, Randall JM, Aballa TC, Lynne CM, Brackett NL: Sperm
motility in men with spinal cord injuries is enhanced by inactivating
cytokines in the seminal plasma. J Androl. 2004; 25: 922-5.
- de Lamirande E, Gagnon C: Reactive oxygen species and human spermatozoa.
I. Effects on the motility of intact spermatozoa and on sperm axonemes.
J Androl. 1992; 13: 368-78.
- Hirsch IH, Sedor J, Callahan HJ, Staas WE Jr: Systemic sperm autoimmunity
in spinal-cord injured men. Arch Androl. 1990; 25: 69-73.
- Borges E Jr, Mori MM, Antunes N Jr: Reprodução Assistida
e Infertilidade Masculina. Consenso Brasileiro sobre Infertilidade Masculina.
São Paulo, BG Cultural. 1999; pp. 69-74.
- Sonksen J, Sommer P, Biering-Sorensen F, Ziebe S, Lindhard A, Loft
A, et al.: Pregnancy after assisted ejaculation procedures in men with
spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997; 78: 1059-61.
- Brindsen PR, Avery SM, Marcus S, Macnamee MC: Trans-rectal electro-ejaculation
combined with in-vitro fertilization: effective treatment of anejaculatory
infertility due to spinal cord injury. Hum Reprod. 1997; 12: 2687-92.
- Kolettis PN, Lambert MC, Hammond KR, Kretzer PA, Steinkampf MP, Lloyd
LK: Fertility outcomes after electro-ejaculation in men with spinal
cord injury. Fertil Steril. 2002; 78: 429-31.
- Shieh JY, Chen SU, Wang YH, Chang HC, Ho HN, Yang YS: A protocol
of electro-ejaculation and systematic assisted reproductive technology
achieved high efficiency and efficacy for pregnancy for anejaculatory
men with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84: 535-40.
- Buch JP, Zorn BH: Evaluation and treatment of infertility in spinal
cord injured men through rectal probe electro-ejaculation. J Urol. 1993;
149: 1350-4.
- Bennett CJ, Ayers JW, Randolph JF Jr, Seager SW, McCabe M, Moinipanah
R, et al.: Electro-ejaculation of paraplegic males followed by pregnancies.
Fertil Steril. 1987; 48: 1070-2.
_________________________
Received: December 12, 2004
Accepted: March 20, 2005
_______________________
Correspondence address:
Dr. Homero Bruschini
Department of Urology, EPM, UNIFESP
Rua Napoleão de Barros, 715 / 2o. andar
São Paulo, SP, 04024-002, Brazil
Fax: + 55 11 5572-6490
E-mail: bruschi@attglobal.net |