UROLOGICAL SURVEY   ( Download pdf )

 

FEMALE UROLOGY

Sexual function in women with pelvic organ prolapse compared to women without pelvic organ prolapse
Novi JM, Jeronis S, Morgan MA, Arya LA
Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
J Urol. 2005; 173: 1669-72

  • Purpose: We compared sexual function in women with pelvic organ prolapse to that in women without prolapse.
  • Materials and Methods: We collected sexual function data using a standardized, validated, condition specific questionnaire. The study group consisted of 30 women with pelvic organ prolapse and it was compared with 30 unmatched controls without evidence of prolapse.
  • Results: The 2 groups were similar in age, race, parity and postmenopausal hormone use. Subjects in the study group were more likely to have undergone previous pelvic surgery. Mean total Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire scores +/- SD were lower in the study group compared with controls (81.4 +/- 7.3 vs 106.4 +/- 15.5, p < 0.001). In the study group total questionnaire scores in women with prior pelvic surgery were similar to those in women without prior pelvic surgery (79.3 +/- 14.9 vs 82.9 +/- 10.2, p = 0.61).
  • Conclusions: Pelvic organ prolapse appears to have a significant negative impact on sexual function.

  • Editorial Comment
    The authors report on a comparison of sexual function in women with pelvic organ prolapse and women without pelvic organ prolapse. They utilized an excellent statistical analysis involving a Likert scale as well as the PISQ (a validated, condition-specific, self-administered questionnaire that evaluates sexual function in women with pelvic organ prolapse and/or urinary incontinence). Statistical planning was utilized to identify the appropriate size study groups to detect a difference if present between the controls and the patients with prolapse.
    This is a noteworthy paper that covers an issue, which is not frequently discussed in the medical office but is never far from the thoughts of a large portion of the population. The study’s strength lies in the use of a validated self administered questionnaire as well as excellent statistical analysis. It did exclude women younger than 35 years perhaps to obtain a greater degree of similarity between the two groups. It addition, it only involved patients presenting for gynecological evaluation or therapy and not the general population. Several key points on which the paper may educate the reader include the findings that there was no significant difference in dyspareunia rate between women with and without previous hysterectomy as well as in women who have undergone anti-incontinence surgery those who did not. This fact will allow the urologic surgeon to clearly respond to patients who wonder about their sexual function after their anti-incontinence operation. The publication helps characterize the sexual habits and desires of patients with prolapse compared to the general population including: observing that both groups were able to find a man when needed; both groups felt their men were sexually satisfied to the same degree; both groups wanted sex to the same degree; and both groups attempted to self pleasure at that same rate and had identical rates of anorgasmia. Differences between the two groups that were highlighted did include that women with prolapse, though masturbating at the same degree, were not able to achieve orgasm with the same degree of efficacy and that though both groups desired sexual activity to the same degree, women with prolapse were not able to participate in coitus at the same level of desired frequency.
    This is an excellent paper, which should be read and appropriately digested. It would have been of extreme interest if the authors had been able to comment if there was an increased rate for women with prolapse utilizing different sexual techniques or acts of pleasure in order to allow their partner to achieve the same rate of partner satisfaction as those without prolapse in view of their altered vaginal anatomy. I recommend this article for all physicians actively involved in prolapse surgery.

Dr. Steven P. Petrou
Associate Professor of Urology
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Jacksonville, Florida, USA