|
PEDIATRIC
UROLOGY
The
Impact of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorders on Brainstem Dysfunction
in Nocturnal Enuresis
Baeyens D, Roeyers H, Hoebeke P, Antrop I, Mauel R, Walle JV
Department of Psychology, Developmental Disorders, Ghent University, Belgium
J Urol. 2006; 176: 744-8
- Purpose:
In a specialized university setting the prevalence of attention deficit
hyperactivity disorder in general and particularly the inattentive subtype
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder of the predominantly inattentive
subtype is highly increased. We replicated previous research findings
that enuresis is associated with a brainstem deficit and investigated
the impact of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder on this brainstem
deficit in enuresis.
-
Materials and Methods: Electromyography
recorded startle eye blink modification with and without attentional
modulation was used to measure brainstem functioning in 158 children
between 6 and 12 years old. Performance in 3 enuresis groups, including
children with enuresis, enuresis plus attention deficit hyperactivity
disorder of the predominantly inattentive subtype and enuresis plus
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder combined, respectively, was
compared with that in normally developing controls and in children with
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder subtypes without enuresis.
-
Results:
In an automatic attentional task the enuresis groups showed decreased
brainstem inhibition compared to that in the control and attention deficit
hyperactivity disorder groups (p < 0.006). In a controlled attentional
task children with and without enuresis who had attention deficit hyperactivity
disorder of the predominantly inattentive subtype were unable to show
attentional modulation in all age groups (p < 0.02).
-
Conclusions:
Startle eye blink modification research reveals a brainstem inhibition
deficit in children with enuresis, which could explain why they are
unable to remain dry at night. When additional attention is allocated
to specific trials in the task, children with attention deficit hyperactivity
disorder of the predominantly inattentive subtype fail to optimize sensory
gating. With respect to enuresis, this could result in an identification
problem of bladder signals, leading to an inadequate or absent arousal
effect in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder of the predominantly
inattentive subtype.
- Editorial
Comment
The authors use Startle Eye Blink studies to compare children with enuresis
to controls and to compare those with attention deficit disorders to
normals. They demonstrated clear differences, with enuretic children
(even those with ADHD) having much lower percentage pre-impulse inhibition
of startle. In some ways but not all, the response was similar to that
seen in patients with ADHD-inattentive subtype who did not have enuresis.
Because Startle Eye Blink studies are a measure of brain-stem function,
the results indicate that children with enuresis have a clearly documented
brain stem dysfunction. In general, this dysfunction over-rides the
effects of ADHD as an association with enuresis.
Nocturnal enuresis is caused by a combination of a large nocturnal urine
output, small nocturnal bladder capacity and a failure of arousal. These
factors all can be related to central nervous system dysfunction. Hence,
it is not surprising that enuretic children might have brainstem dysfunction.
This particular study is confounded a bit in that almost 30% of the
enuretic group had daytime symptoms also. Since it is generally thought
that diurnal enuresis has a different etiology than mono-symptomatic
nocturnal enuresis, it would have been nice to have the different groups
separated out. Also, the percentage pre-impulse inhibition of startle
can be increased by medications, in particular methylphenidate. It would
have been fascinating to test the results of methylphenidate treatment
in these groups, even though it has not been shown to improve enuresis.
Any divergence of effect would be helpful in understanding the pathophysiology
of nocturnal enuresis better.
Studies of this type should be encouraged. The relationship between
brain function and voiding function is intuitively clear, but obviously
quite complex. Nonetheless, further application of modern neuroscience
tools to patients with voiding function should be encouraged as these
investigations will be helpful in understanding the conditions and in
developing new therapeutic interventions.
Dr.
Barry A. Kogan
Chief and Professor of Urology and Pediatrics
Albany Medical College
Albany, New York, USA |