|
UROGENITAL
TRAUMA
Penetrating
external genital trauma: a 30-year single institution experience
Phonsombat S, Master VA, McAninch JW
Department of Urology, San Francisco General Hospital and University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
J Urol. 2008; 180: 192-5; discussion 195-6
- Purpose:
We
examine the characteristics, outcomes and incidence of penetrating external
genital trauma at our level I trauma center.
-
Materials and Methods:
Patient records entered into our urological trauma registry were reviewed
from 1977 to August 2006.
- Results:
A total of 110 patients sustained penetrating external genital trauma.
Injuries were divided into gunshot wounds (49%), stab wounds/lacerations
(44%) and bites (7%). Half of the stab wounds/lacerations were self-emasculation
injuries. Operative exploration was performed in 78%, 63% and 75% of
gunshot wounds, stab wounds/lacerations and bite injuries, respectively.
Of 6 patients with complete penile amputations 5 underwent replantation
with an 80% success rate. Testicular injury occurred in 39% and 27%
of patients with gunshot wounds and stab wounds/lacerations, respectively.
Of the 24 testicles injured via gunshot wounds 18 were reconstructed
(75%). Testicular salvage rates were 24% (4 of 17) for self-emasculation
stab wounds and 20% (1 of 5) for all other stab wounds/lacerations injuries.
Of patients with penetrating external genital trauma 11% also had associated
urethral injuries. The incidence of penetrating external genital trauma
has remained stable during the last 30 years (r(2) = 0.98). Of patients
treated with operative exploration 8% and of those treated nonoperatively
4% reported complications.
-
Conclusions:
Conservative débridement of penetrating injuries to the external
genitalia should be stressed to maximize tissue preservation. Testicular
salvage rates are significantly higher in gunshot wound injuries (75%)
compared to stab wounds/lacerations injuries (23%) (p <0.001). A
select group of patients with penile and scrotal injuries (ie those
with injuries superficial to Buck’s or dartos fascia) may undergo
nonsurgical treatment of the penetrating external genital injury with
minimal morbidity.
- Editorial
Comment
The above two articles are from major trauma centers in the US, from
San Francisco and Philadelphia. The San Francisco paper is unique in
that the 30 year experience is the cumulative experience of one surgeon
(an authority in the field) over the course of his career. This continuity
and consistency of care, strengthens the conclusions of this paper.
Overall, both papers illustrate that penetrating genital injuries occur
uncommonly – even in major trauma centers, only 3 or so cases
per year. Such rare events, further values the conclusions and cumulative
experience of papers over such long study period. Aside from evaluating
the injury to the genitals, all patients need to be evaluated according
to AAST trauma protocols, including routine radiographs of the chest
and abdomen, with entrance and exit wounds marked with radio-opaque
markers. General surgical principles for managing penetrating injuries
apply well to external genitalia trauma, except for wounds of the corpora
cavernosum and spongiosum, which should be treated like vasculature,
with limited debridement and good hemostatic closure, except repaired
with absorbable suture material. General management consists of meticulous
hemostasis, vigorous saline lavage, removal of foreign bodies, hematoma
evacuation, conservative debridement of devitalized tissue, repair of
associated injuries, and primary wound closure. Infection is rare in
properly debrided wounds.
Penetrating injuries to the penis (deep to Buck’s fascia) demand
evaluation for associated urethral injury by either retrograde urethrography
or cystoscopy. Surgical exploration should be performed in all cases
except with the most insignificant and superficial wound. Blood at the
meatus or gross hematuria highly suggests a urethral injury and warrant
evaluation. Corporal injuries should be repaired primarily with absorbable
sutures. Low velocity penetrating urethral injuries should be repaired
primarily – typically by an anastomotic urethroplasty. Primary
realignment for such urethral injuries often results in high urethral
strictures rates. Staged urethral injury repair is often reserved for
extensive injuries – as is often seen in high velocity gunshot
wound tissue injuries Patients with injuries to the scrotum deep to
Dartos fascia or with scrotal swelling also warrant exploration. Penetrating
wounds to the scrotum damage a testis or cord roughly half the time.
Once the testis is struck, the chance to salvage the testis after a
low velocity GSW is 25 -50%. This contrasts sharply for high velocity
injuries of the battlefield, where salvage is rare. Scrotal stab wounds
seem to more commonly involve the vascular cord, and thus explaining
the reported poor salvage rate.
Dr.
Steven B. Brandes
Associate Professor, Division of Urologic Surgery
Washington University in St. Louis
St. Louis, Missouri, USA
E-mail: brandess@wudosis.wustl.edu |