|
RECONSTRUCTIVE
UROLOGY
Laparoscopic
ureteroneocystostomy and psoas hitch for post-hysterectomy ureterovaginal
fistula
Modi P, Gupta R, Rizvi SJ
Department of Urology and Transplantation Surgery, Institute of Kidney
Diseases and Research Centre, Institute of Transplantation Sciences, Civil
Hospital Campus, Asarwa, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
J Urol. 2008; 180: 615-7
-
Purpose:
We assessed the results of laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy with a
psoas hitch for iatrogenic lower ureteral injuries leading to a ureterovaginal
fistula.
-
Materials and Methods:
Between July 2003 and November 2007, 18 patients with iatrogenic lower
ureteral injuries during hysterectomy leading to ureterovaginal fistula
underwent laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy with a psoas hitch. Of the
patients 17 underwent abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy, while in 1
with a ruptured gravid uterus emergency hysterectomy was done for uncontrolled
bleeding. Mean patient age was 35.5 years (range 23 to 45) and mean
time to surgery since the injury was 2.2 months (range 1.5 to 3.5).
Transperitoneal 3 or 4 port laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy with a
psoas hitch was performed.
-
Results:
Of the procedures 17 were completed successfully. Intraoperative cardiac
arrhythmia occurred in 1 patient due to pneumoperitoneum and hypercarbia,
requiring open conversion. Mean operative time was 2.5 hours (range
1.9 to 2.8) hours, mean blood loss was 90 ml (range 45 to 150) and total
hospital stay was 5.3 days (range 2.9 to 8). The nephrostomy tube was
blocked on the table in all patients and it was removed on day 7. At
an average followup of 26.4 months (range 3 to 52) postoperative excretory
urography did not reveal obstruction in any patient. One patient had
vesicoureteral reflux on voiding cystogram.
-
Conclusions:
Laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy with a psoas hitch for ureterovaginal
fistula secondary to hysterectomy is safe and effective, and associated
with a low incidence of postoperative reflux and obstruction.
- Editorial
Comment
Using a minimally invasive approach, a laparoscopic ureter reimplantation
in an anti-refluxive fashion, is a logical approach if a fistula occurs
after a transvaginal hysterectomy. Mondi et al. presented 18 cases using
a laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy in a psoas hitch technique with
a no-refluxing Lich-Gregoir only technique, which seems to be very convincing
and is supported with the recent publication of Patill et al. (1,2).
With the increased integration of laparoscopic surgery in our department,
similar cases have been treated. From our recent experiences, we propose
a modified approach: because of the fistula tissue we try to avoid any
foreign material and comparatively use a clip at the distal ureter thermofusion
to seal the ureter (3). Further, most commonly the fistula is not associated
with an obstruction or even stricture of the ureter. A double-J-stent
usually secures drainage of the kidney without the requirement of a
nephrostomy tube. Only in those cases with a stricture a nephrostomy
tube is required, which will be replaced intraoperatively while performing
the ureteroneocystostomy into the bladder dome using a double-J-stent.
After four weeks in particular, in women the double-J-stent can be removed
without the need of anesthesia. In the context of mini-percutaneous
nephrolithomy, we evaluated the patient’s preference and concluded
that the double-J-stents causes less pain, its removal is less traumatic
to the patient than a nephrostomy tube and also needs to stay in place
even if it is only for a week (4).
Overall we believe the laparoscopic approach to treat distal uretral
fistulas or strictures are feasible. As the authors mentioned, the patient
recovers faster. However, the laparoscopic approach with the implantation
of the ureter into the ventral bladder wall - with a bigger distance
to the former fistula location -, compared to the open procedure where
the ureter is placed dorsally, needs to be evaluated over time and compared
against the open procedure.
References
1. Modi P, Gupta R, Rizvi SJ: Laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy and psoas
hitch for post-hysterectomy ureterovaginal fistula. J Urol. 2008; 180:
615-7.
2. Patil NN, Mottrie A, Sundaram B, Patel VR: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic
ureteral reimplantation with psoas hitch: a multi-institutional, multinational
evaluation. Urology. 2008; 72: 47-50; discussion 50.
3. Nagele U, Merseburger AS, Horstmann M, Amend A, Schilling D, Kuczyk
M, et al.: Thermofused bladder cuff resection in nephroureterectomy -
a new approach, J Urol. 2008; 179: 346 (Abst# V1058).
4. Nagele U, Schilling D, Anastasiadis AG, Corvin S, Seibold J, Kuczyk
M, et al.: Closing the tract of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with
gelatine matrix hemostatic sealant can replace nephrostomy tube placement.
Urology. 2006; 68: 489-93; discussion 493-4.
Dr.
Karl-Dietrich Sievert,
Dr. Udo Nagele & Dr. Arnulf Stenzl
Department of Urology
Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen
Tuebingen, Germany
E-mail: arnulf.stenzl@med.uni-tuebingen.de |