|
IMAGING
Three-dimensional
CT pyelography for planning of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: accuracy
of stone measurement, stone depiction and pelvicalyceal reconstruction
Patel U, Walkden RM, Ghani KR, Anson K
Department of Radiology, St George’s Hospital and Medical School,
London, UK
Eur Radiol. 2009; 19: 1280-8
- Retrospective
evaluation of computed tomographic (CT) pyelography before percutaneous
nephrostolithotomy (PCNL). Twenty patients with renal calculi underwent
CT pyelography using a dedicated protocol. Calculus size, uniformity
of contrast excretion and accuracy of calculus and pelvicalyceal (PC)
system reconstructions were scored and compared on axial and coronal
maximum intensity projections (MIP) and volume reconstructions (VRmovie
loops). After contrast medium administration, the size of calculi is
accurate on axial images, but underestimated on coronal studies: mean
14.7 mm vs. 14.4 mm (axial) and 17.2 mm vs. 16.1 mm (coronal) for measurements
before and after enhancement, respectively (p = 0.11 and 0.03). Uniform
contrast medium excretion (median 228 HU; 95% CI 209-266 HU) was sufficiently
lower than calculus density (median 845 HU; 95% CI 457-1,193 HU) for
precise calculus and pelvicalyceal reconstructions in 87% and 85%, respectively.
Coronal MIP scans were rated best for calculus depiction (mean score
2.68 vs. 2.50 and 2.41 for coronal, axial and VRs, respectively; p =
0.14) and VR studies best for PC anatomy (mean score 4.4 vs. 3.73 and
2.89 for VR, coronal and axial studies, respectively; p = < 0.0001).
Three-dimensional CT pyelography can accurately demonstrate calculus
position and spatial relationships of the collecting system before PCNL.
- Editorial
Comment
Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy (PCNL) requires detailed imaging techniques
to define stone burden and delineate the anatomy of the kidney and other
adjacent organs and structures. Adequate safe percutaneous access can
also be accomplished with preoperative imaging studies. As we know,
non-contrast MDCT studies using multiplanar, curve and surface reconstruction
are useful tools for the detection of renal stones but offers poor information
regarding the pelvicalyceal anatomy. Coronal and sagital MIP and volume-rendered
reconstructions obtained during routine CT-urography technique offers
superb anatomic details of the pelvicalyceal system. However using this
technique the visualization of low-density stones (pure acid uric with
density ranging from 230-340 HU) is a difficult task since the contrast
density within pelvicalyceal system in CT-urography ranges from 500-600
HU.
For this reason, the authors developed a tailored protocol called CT-pyelography,
using both furosemide and saline bolus after contrast medium, in attempt
to decrease the contrast density within pelvicalyceal system. The median
contrast medium density observed with CT-pyelogram was 228 HU (range
134-1498 HU). This technique allowed the detection of 87% of significant
renal calculi and 85% of all upper pelvicalyceal system details. In
our opinion, however, low-density matrix and small or low-density stones
may still be missed by this new approach.
Dr.
Adilson Prando
Chief, Department of Radiology and
Diagnostic Imaging, Vera Cruz Hospital
Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
E-mail: adilson.prando@gmail.com
|