|
EFFECTS
OF HIGH-ENERGY SHOCK WAVE ON ORGANS ADJACENT TO THE KIDNEY IN THE GROWING
RAT
(
Download pdf )
AGUINALDO C. NARDI,
UBIRAJARA FERREIRA, JOAQUIM A. CLARO, GUSTAVO M. BORGES, RAFAEL M. STOPIGLIA,
N. RODRIGUES NETTO JR.
Discipline
of Urology, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, State University
of Campinas, UNICAMP, Campinas, SP
ABSTRACT
Objective:
To assess the effects of high-energy shock waves (HESW) on organs adjacent
to the kidney, in the growing rat.
Materials and Methods: We studied 60 Wistar
male rats. Upon completing 30 days of age, a radiopaque marker was placed
in the animals’ left renal cavity. With 40 days of age, after radiologically
confirming the markers’ position, the rats were divided into 2 groups:
control-group – 30 rats that did not receive shock waves; experimental
group– 30 rats exposed to 1000 shock waves of 17.2 KV in intensity.
The rats were sacrificed 7, 90 and 180 days after exposure to HESW. The
bodily growth was assessed and the analysis of macro- and microscopic
morphology of liver, spleen, pancreas, lungs and adrenals.
Results: There was no statistical difference
in the animals’ bodily growth. The microscopic morphologic analysis
demonstrated significant alterations in spleen (proliferative changes
in the red pulp) and liver (cloudy swelling) of the animals submitted
to HESW and sacrificed on the seventh day. These changes completely disappeared
in subsequent analyses.
Conclusion: HESW applied to rat did not
inhibit the animals’ growth and caused transitory histological lesion
in spleen (proliferative changes in the red pulp) and in liver (cloudy
swelling of hepatocytes). Such changes were observed only in the group
that was exposed to HESW and was sacrificed 7 days following the experiment,
presenting spontaneous recovery.
Key
words: kidney; high-energy shock waves; rats; spleen; liver
Int Braz J Urol. 2004; 30: 142-147
INTRODUCTION
Extracorporeal
shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a safe and effective method for treating
renal lithiasis. However, there are still doubts about its effects over
growing tissues. Though extracorporeal lithotripsy is a standard treatment
for lithiasis in the childhood (1-7), some data in the literature confirm
the deleterious effects of ESWL such as, for example, decrease in the
glomerular filtration rate and a significant delay of renal growth (8)
in children who undergo ESWL. Such data suggest the need of following
these patients over prolonged period and continuously performing experimental
studies.
This study aims to assess the effects of
high-energy shock waves (HESW) on bodily growth and on organs adjacent
to the kidney in male rats.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
A
total of 60 male rats (“Ratus Norvegicus”, variety “Albinus”,
originally from Wistar race) were used. The animals were kept in proper
cages, with a number of 5 rats per cage. Feeding consisted of ration and
water “ad libitum”. We used room temperature, with non-programmed
humidity and light control alternating 12 hours in dark and 12 hours in
light.
Animals were anesthetized through inhalation
of ethylic ether in a proper campanula, during all manipulation periods:
surgical period (insertion of radiopaque marker), during exposure to HESW
and for performing the sacrifice.
With 30 days of life, an incision was performed
on right flank for peritoneal approach, through clean, but not sterile,
technique. The left kidney was exposed and renal cavity was marked by
a rubber wire coated with barium sulphate.
With 40 days of life, animals were divided
into 2 groups with 30 animals each: control group and animals that would
be exposed to shock waves. The animals were then sacrificed 7, 90 and
180 days following the exposure to HESW.
One day before the experiment, a plain radiography
was performed for all animals, in order to confirm the location of the
radiopaque marker. The lithotriptor used was the Lithostar-Siemens. This
equipment has an electromagnetic shock wave generator that produces a
tension ranging from 200 to 380 bar, depending on the voltage used (13
to 19 KV). In this study, we used a voltage of 17.2 KV, performing 1000
shock wave impulses, with equipment’s tension focus of approximately
11 mm x 90 mm and a focal distance of 113 mm. The only modification required
for applying shock waves to the rat, was the placement of a water bag between
the wave generator and the animal in order to allow adjustment of the
focal area over the radiopaque marker inserted in the animal’s renal
cavity.
The following organs were morphologically
studied: right and left lungs, spleen, liver, pancreas, right adrenal
and left adrenal. Sacrifice was performed with inhalatory anesthesia and
through median thoraco-abdominal incision. The organs were cleaned and
photographed, and then fixed in formalin. The employed staining was hematoxilin-eosin.
In order to compare the weight of rats from
the control and experimental groups, the Student’s “t”
test was used and a significance level of 5% was adopted. The Fisher’s
test was used for statistical analysis of the histopathologic results.
RESULTS
In
relation to bodily growth, there was no significant difference between
animals exposed to HESW and those from the control group.
After opening the abdominal cavity, the
radiopaque marker’s location was checked, confirming its adherence
to the renal cavity in all rats. There was no sign of renal or peri-renal
hematoma, neither renal scarring. The inspection of the abdominal cavity
did not reveal any hemorrhagic area and all organs presented normal color
and surface, with no signs of trauma, scars or contusions.
The histological alterations observed in
the organs examined occurred only in the group that was assessed 7 days
after exposure, involving spleen and liver (Table-1).
In the majority of rats from the control
group that were sacrificed on the seventh day of study, the spleen showed
normal histological pattern and proper for age. In rats subjected to HESW
and sacrificed on the seventh day, the splenic architecture was preserved,
but the red pulp showed a markedly higher cellularity in relation to the
control group. There was an evident increase in the number of megakaryocytes,
appearance of erythroblasts nests and collections of immature leukocytes.
Such cellular proliferation in the red pulp was designated as proliferative
changes of red pulp (PCRP), occurring uniformly in all rats from the experimental
group on the seventh day and in only one rat from the control group, in
the same period (Figures-1 and 2).
In liver’s histological sections, in all
rats of the experimental group, on the seventh day, and in 4 rats from
the control group during the same period, a generalized volumetric increase
was verified in the hepatocytes, where the cytoplasm was clearer and more
distinguished from basophilic organelles, characterizing the condition
described as “cloudy swelling” of hepatocytes (Figures-3 and
4). There was no inflammatory infiltrate, reticuloendothelial proliferation,
hemorrhagic areas or isolated necrosis.
Still during the 7-day period, a loose aspect
of the septal connective tissue was observed in the lungs of 4 rats from
the experimental group and in 2 from the control group, which was interpreted
as septal edema. This alteration did not show a significant difference
between the groups under study.
No circulatory, degenerative, necrotic or
inflammatory alterations were detected in pancreas and adrenals, in both
groups.
In the 90- and 180-day period, the examined
organs maintained, in general, a normal histological pattern. The spleen,
that showed significant alterations in the first period, presented normal
histological pattern, showing reversibility of the changes previously
described. The same occurs with the hepatic alterations that were described
in the first period.
Two rats from the experimental group, at
180 days, presented some clusters of immature leukocytes in the splenic
red pulp and in one rat a well-defined picture of PCRP was observed, similar
to the one observed in rats from the experimental group on the seventh
day.
DISCUSSION
The
rat was chosen as experimental animal because it is a small animal, of
easy handling, resistant to diseases, has a low maintenance cost and especially
because it has a relatively short life cycle (9).
The rat reaches adult age around 24 weeks
and senility usually occurs from 2 years old on (10). Such data are fundamentally
important for this study, because the analysis of results accompanies
the rats’ growth, since the animals were exposed to HESW during
childhood and assessed throughout their development, until adult age.
The lithotriptor used in this study (Lithostar)
is an equipment that presents highly satisfactory results for fragmenting
stone, with fragmentation indexes ranging from 80 to 95%. In children,
the Lithostar allows to position the patient without technical modifications,
in addition to providing a smaller shock wave exposure area, which makes
ESWL safer (1). This equipment is used in several centers throughout the
world.
Several animal experiments (11-13) analyzed
the effects of ESWL. Studies with rats show that tissue lesions start
from 500 shock waves on, and that there is no significant difference between
the use of 1000, 2000 and 3000 impulses, concerning damages to liver parenchyma
(14).
In this study, the use of 1000 shock waves
was preferred in order to guarantee the manifestation of potential effects,
that is, using a markedly higher number than 500 impulses. The impulse
intensity used in the experiment was quite high, corresponding to 350
bar.
Studies performed in rabbits (11), rats
(15-16) and other animals assessed the influence of HESW over their growth,
finding no significant difference between bodily and renal growth. The
present study showed also that there was no change in the bodily growth
of animals subjected to HESW, compared to the control group.
Lesions in organs adjacent to the kidney,
during the acute phase, are well established in the literature (17). Several
studies (14,18) show complete remission of macroscopic alterations in
organs adjacent to the kidney, 7 days following the application of HESW.
In the present study, macroscopic evaluation of organs adjacent to the
kidney was normal, thus compatible with the literature.
Upon assessing the microscopic results,
only those changes occurring on the seventh post-experiment day can be
valued and related to the experimental procedures.
In all rats from the experimental group
at the seventh day, in one from the 180-day group and in one rat from
the control group at the seventh day, an increased hematopoiesis was detected
in the splenic red pulp, which was defined by an increase in the number
of megakaryocytes and by the presence of erythroblasts nests and immature
leukocytic cells. Such cellular changes were designated proliferative
changes of the red pulp (PCRP).
The increased hematopoiesis in the spleen
of young rats can be related to inflammatory, neoplastic or hematopoietic
stimuli (19). Evidently, there is no stimulus of neoplastic nature and
we do not believe that any inflammatory stimuli existing previously to
the seventh day of the experiment could be responsible for this kind of
systemic response. Severe acute hemorrhage could trigger erythropoiesis
and increase the production of megakaryocytes. However, in this study,
no signs of current or organized hemorrhage were macroscopically detected,
in the observed organs.
One hypothesis that could probably explain
how shock waves alone can influence the development of extramedullary
erythropoiesis in spleen lies in the fact that shock waves can release
erythropoietin, which is produced by interstitial renal cells, among the
tubules. Erythropoietin secretion is responsible for secondary erythrocytosis
and, in such cases, hormonal action can stimulate the increase in production
of cells from the hematopoietic lineage not only in bone marrow, but in
the spleen as well.
Another hypothesis that could explain such
changes is related to the direct action of HESW over splenic cells, due
to the proximity of this organ o the kidney, in the rat. The mechanism
of lesion can also be related to the release of free radicals, secondarily
to the cavitation phenomenon, which can stimulate hematopoiesis in the
spleen.
Whatever the cause, the hematopoiesis observed
in these animals is a transitory phenomenon, and is not present in the
majority of animals sacrificed in subsequent periods.
In relation to liver, in all animals that
underwent HESW and sacrificed after 7 days, an alteration described as
“cloudy swelling” of hepatocytes was observed. This term is
used to describe the swelling aspect of the organs involved and occurs
as a result of changes in the mechanisms of cell membrane control, allowing
an excessive entrance of water to the intracellular environment with consequent
cell tumefaction (20). It is highly reversible, with hypoxia, severe malnutrition
and toxic infectious states being the more frequent causes.
Cloudy swelling did not occur exclusively
in rats subjected to HESW, but the difference between the control and
experimental groups was statistically significant. An eventual direct
or reflected action of HESW over the hepatic parenchyma seems unlikely,
since cloudy swelling is a generalized alteration of the hepatic parenchyma.
However, it could be explained by the extension of the focal zone of the
lithotriptor used (11 x 90 mm) and by the effects of cavitation phenomenon.
There were no significant circulatory, degenerative,
necrotic and inflammatory alterations in lungs, pancreas and adrenals,
meaning that such organs were not affected by shock waves.
Thus, from a histological point of view,
the only changes that can be directly related to the application of HESW
are those found in spleen and liver, almost exclusively in the experimental
group that was sacrificed seven days following the exposure.
The findings of this study show that HESW
can affect growing tissues, which are close to the focal zone and subjected
to the effects of cavitation due to direct action of HESW as well as indirect
mechanisms, such as release of erythropoietin and free radicals, that
can be best understood through new studies.
The development of new equipments, capable
of reducing the focal zone, with a better orientation of HESW and without
impairing fragmentation will provide a higher safety when using this method
in children.
CONCLUSIONS
Through
the present study we were able to conclude that high-energy shock waves
applied to the rat did not inhibit the animals’ growth, since the
percentage of weight gain was similar between the control and experimental
groups.
High-energy shock waves caused a transitory
histological lesion in spleen, characterized by proliferative changes
in the red pulp, and in liver, characterized by cloudy swelling of hepatocytes.
Such changes were observed only in the group that was exposed to HESW
and sacrificed 7 days after the experiment. Rats that were followed for
90 and 180 days presented spontaneous recovery.
REFERENCES
- Thomas R, Frentz JM, Harmon E, Frentz GD: Effect of extracorporeal
shock wave lithotrips on renal function and body height in pediatric
patients. J Urol. 1992; 148:1064-6.
- Dumont M, Marchand L, Laroche B, Robert G, Thabet M: Scintigraphic
evaluation of renal function after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
J Can Assoc Radiol. 1990; 41: 138-40.
- Lim D, Walker RD, Ellsworth PI, Newman RC, Cohen MS, Barraza MA,
et al.: Treatment of pediatric urolithiasis between 1984 and 1994. J
Urol. 1996; 156: 702-5.
- Nazli O, Cal C, Ozyurt C, Guinaydin G, Cureklibatir I, Aucieri V,
et al.: Results of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the pediatric
age group. Eur Urol. 1998; 33: 333-6.
- Demirkesen O, Tansu N, Yaycioglu O, Onal B, Yalcin V, Solok V: Extracorporeal
shock wave lithotripsy in the pediatric population. J Endourol. 1999;
13:147-50.
- Longo JA, Netto Junior NR: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
in children. Urology. 1995; 46: 550-2.
- Shukla AR, Hoover DL, Homsy IL, Perlman S, Schurman S, Reisman EM:
Urolithiasis in the small infant: the role and efficacy of extracorporeal
shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol. 2000; 163: 82 (Abst. 362).
- Lifshitz DA, Lingeman JE, Zafar FS, Hollensbe DW, Nyhuis AW, Evan
AP: Alterations in predicted growth rates of pediatric kidneys treated
with extracorporeal shock wave lithotropsy. J Endourol. 1998; 12: 469-75.
- Denardi F: Undernutrition and Compensatory Renal Growth: Experimental
Study in Rats. Doctoral Thesis, Medical School, Paulista State University,
Botucatu, São Paulo, 1992. [in Portuguese]
- Wesson LG: Compensatory growth and other growth responses of the
kidney. Nephron. 1989; 51: 149-84.
- Van Arsdalen KN, Kurzweil S, Smith J, Levin R: Effect of lithotripsy
on immature rabbit bone and kidney development. J Urol. 1991; 146: 213-6.
- Weber C, Moran ME, Braum ET, Drach GW: Injury of rat renal vessels
following extracorporeal shock wave treatment. J Urol. 1992; 147: 476-81.
- Banner B, Ziesmer D, Colins LA: Proliferative glomerulopathy following
extracorporeal shock wave lithotropsy in the pig. J Urol. 1991; 146:
1425-8.
- Goldenberg A, Nigro TJA, Netottegd GJ, Lanzone PV, Goldenberg S:
Effects of shock wave on rat liver. Acta Cir Bras. 1994; 2: 51-64.
- Claro JA: Shock Wave Effects in Renal Growth and Function: Experimental
Study in Rats. Doctoral Thesis, Medical School, State University of
Campinas, São Paulo, 1994. [in Portuguese]
- Ferreira U, Claro JA, Denardi F, Figueiredo JF, Riccetto CLZ, Netto
Junior NR: Functional and histological alterations in growing solitary
rat kidney as result of extracorporeal shock waves. J Endourol. 1995;
9: 45-9.
- Chaussy C, Rondazzo RF, Fuchs JG: The effects of extracorporeal shock
waves on human renal carcinoma cells and normal human embryonic kidney
cells. J Urol. 1986; 135: 320.
- Vergunst H, Terpstra OT, Brakel K, Lameris JS, Van Blaskenstein M,
Schoereder FH: Safety and Efficacy in Biliary Lithotripsy. In : Burhenne
HJ, Paumgartner G, Ferruci JT (eds.), Biliary Lithotripsy II. Chicago,
Year Book Med Publ. 1990; pp. 25-8.
- Ward JM: Classification of Reactive Lesions, Spleen. In: Jones TC,
Ward JM, Mohr V, Hant RD (eds.): Hemopoietic System. Berlim, Springer-Verlag.1990;
pp. 220-6.
- Crawford JM: The Liver and Biliary Tract. In: Cotran RS, Kumar V,
Collins T: Robbins (eds.), Pathologic Basis of Disease. Philadelphia,
W.B. Saunders. 6th ed., 1999; p. 847.
________________________
Received: February 18, 2004
Accepted after revision: April 15, 2004
________________________
Correspondence address:
Dr. Ubirajara Ferreira
Rua Conceição, 233 / 1603
Campinas, SP, 13010-916, Brazil
Fax: + 55 19 3236-1177
E-mail: ubirafer@uol.com.br |