| SPONTANEOUS 
        RESOLUTION RATES OF VESICOURETERAL REFLUX IN BRAZILIAN CHILDREN: A 30-YEAR 
        EXPERIENCE( 
        Download pdf )
 MIGUEL ZERATI FILHO, 
        ADRIANO A. CALADO, UBIRAJARA BARROSO JR, JOAO L. AMARO Division 
        of Urology, Sao Paulo State University, UNESP, Botucatu, Sao Paulo, Brazil ABSTRACT      Objective: 
        We evaluated clinical characteristics of primary vesicoureteral reflux 
        (VUR) in infants in a 30-year period in Brazil with special reference 
        to the relation of renal parenchymal damage to urinary tract infection 
        and gender.Materials and Methods: From 1975 through 
        2005, 417 girls (81.6%) and 94 boys (18.4%) with all grades of reflux 
        were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized by the worst 
        grade of reflux, maintained on antibiotic prophylaxis and underwent yearly 
        voiding cystourethrography until the reflux was resolved. VUR was considered 
        resolved when a follow-up cystogram demonstrated no reflux. Surgical correction 
        was recommended for those who fail medical therapy, severe renal scarring 
        or persistent VUR.
 Results: Grades I to V VUR resolved in 87.5%, 
        77.6%, 52.8%, 12.2% and 4.3%, respectively. Renal scars were present at 
        presentation in 98 patients (19.2%). Neither gender nor bilaterality versus 
        unilaterality was a helpful predictor of resolution. The significant difference 
        was found among the curves using the log rank (p < 0.001) or Wilcoxon 
        (p < 0.001) test.
 Conclusion: Despite the current use of screening 
        prenatal ultrasound, many infants are still diagnosed as having vesicoureteral 
        reflux only after the occurrence of urinary tract infection in our country. 
        Scarring may be associated to any reflux grade and it may be initially 
        diagnosed at any age but half of the scars are noted with higher grades 
        of reflux (IV and V). The incidence of reflux related morbidity in children 
        has significantly diminished over the last three decades.
 Key 
        words: ureter; vesico-ureteral reflux; reconstructive surgical 
        proceduresInt Braz J Urol. 2007; 33: 204-15
 INTRODUCTION      Vesicoureteral 
        reflux (VUR) is a common pediatric problem. The possibility of renal damage 
        due to VUR and consequently renal function impairment and hypertension 
        gives the necessary impetus for the diagnosis or exclusion of this problem 
        (1). In general, it was thought that medical and surgical management represented 
        equally efficacious treatment options (1,2). Both treatment forms have 
        advantages and disadvantages that must be taken into account and shared 
        with the parents when choosing the best approach. If, on one hand, clinical 
        treatment requires chronic antibiotic prophylaxis, periodic surveillance 
        of urine cultures and periodic voiding cystourethrograms (VCUGs), which 
        despite the low morbidity may cause discomfort, on the other hand, surgery 
        is related to the risks of a surgical-anesthetic procedure.Several studies carried out in Europe and 
        in the United States have established the rates of spontaneous resolution 
        for patients with VUR undergoing medical management. Due to the lack of 
        similar data in our country, specialists have used these data for management 
        of the patients.
 The primary endpoint of this study was defining 
        the rates of spontaneous resolution for patients with VUR in our country. 
        These data may be helpful to determine the need for surgical intervention 
        and the proper follow-up schedule in patients on antibiotic prophylaxis.
 On the other hand, the group selected in 
        this report, which was conservatively managed over a 30-year period, is 
        of particular interest in understanding the changes in the approach of 
        VUR in this period of time. Besides finding out the overall resolution 
        rate, we saw if we could find differences between the groups according 
        to the period diagnosis was carried out.
  MATERIALS 
        AND METHODS       Of 
        the 813 consecutive patients with VUR treated at our institution from 
        January 1975 to December 2005, 302 were excluded because in 121 a VCUG 
        was not repeated, in 105 follow-up were insufficient (< 12 months) 
        and 76 children had secondary VUR. 511 children were retrospectively evaluated 
        and met the inclusion criteria: a) age < 10 years at the time of diagnosis; 
        b) radiological tests confirming VUR and VUR grade; c) minimum follow-up 
        time of 12 months; d) no voiding dysfunction, neuropathic bladder, duplicated 
        systems, ectopic ureters, ureterocele, and other associated pathologies. 
        VUR was detected by VCUG and the grade classified according to the International 
        Reflux Study Committee (3). The renal parenchyma was evaluated using 
        renal cortical scintigraphy (99mTc-DMSA), intravenous urography 
        or both (4-6). Patients were kept under continuous prophylaxis and had 
        urine culture collected on a monthly basis, upper urinary tract assessment 
        with renal ultrasonography (RUS) every six months and intravenous urography 
        or scintigraphy and VCUG once a year. Reflux was considered resolved when 
        absent on a single cystogram.
 Patients with any of the following parameters 
        underwent surgery: failure of medical management (breakthrough urinary 
        tract infections and patient noncompliance), increase or development of 
        new renal scars and reflux that fails to resolve (mainly grade IV or V).
 After obtaining demographic data, patients 
        were divided into three groups according to the period diagnosis was carried 
        out: Group A (n = 80) from 1975 to 1985; Group B (n = 205) from 1986 to 
        1995; Group C (n = 226) from 1996 to 2005.
 The results were statistically analyzed 
        using the Minitab® statistical computing software, with p < 0.05 
        considered to indicate statistical significance. Kaplan-Meier curves were 
        constructed to estimate the reflux resolution rate per grade and the rates 
        were compared using the log rank and Wilcox on tests. Data shown in the 
        tables were analyzed by the chi-square test. The study protocol was reviewed 
        and approved by the local ethics committee.
  RESULTS       The 
        initial clinical manifestation leading to the diagnosis of VUR in 85% 
        of the cases was urinary tract infection, confirmed by urinary culture, 
        followed by fever of indeterminate cause (5.4%), lumbar pain (3.5%), antenatal 
        hydronephrosis (2.9%), hematuria (2.5%) and others. Mean age at presentation 
        was 3.1 years and median follow-up was 2.7 years (1.2 - 12.4 years). VUR 
        was unilateral in 250 (48.9%) and bilateral in 261 (51.1%) cases. Grade 
        II VUR was detected more frequently (192 cases – 37.6%), followed 
        by grade III (174 cases - 34%), grade IV (74 cases – 14.5%), grade 
        I (48 cases – 9.4%) and grade V (23 cases – 4.5%).We observed an incidence 4 times greater 
        in females than in males (81.6% against 18.4%). When patients were stratified 
        according to age at diagnosis, it was observed that the number of boys 
        with VUR decreases with age, ranging from 29.4% in the first year of life 
        to 10.2% in children over 5 years of age. One hundred and twenty female 
        patients (70.6%) had a diagnosis of VUR before 1 year of age, whereas 
        89.8% (70/78) girls had a diagnosis of VUR over 5 years of age.
 The large majority of diagnosis, 344 (67.3%), 
        was made before the 3rd year of life, of which 170 (33.2%) before the 
        first year (Figure-1). The stratification of patients according to VUR 
        grade shows a similar distribution among the three groups (Table-1). There 
        was no significant difference among the study groups (A, B and C) for 
        the severity of VUR. Table-2 shows the tests carried out in the initial 
        evaluation of the patients in the study groups. For the statistical analysis, 
        groups A and B were analyzed together due to the small sample of patients 
        who carried out RUS and DMSA scan in group A. In the first period, intravenous 
        urography was carried out in 93.7% of the cases and RUS and DMSA scan 
        in 1.2% and 13.7% respectively. In the last decade there is an important 
        change, and intravenous urography is used in only 21.2% of the children 
        and RUS and scintigraphy is used in 88% and 23.4% respectively. There 
        is a significant difference between groups (A+B) and C for the use of 
        RUS, scintigraphy and intravenous urography (p < 0.001).
 
 
   
 
   
 
   
 Patients were also evaluated for the presence 
        of renal scars at the time of diagnosis. In group A, 31.2% (25/80) had 
        renal scars, in group B, 20.5% (42/205); and in group C, 13.7% (31/226) 
        (Figure-2). There was a significant difference between groups for the 
        presence of renal scars in the initial evaluation (p = 0.02), with a clear 
        decrease of renal scars in the last period, from 1996 to 2005. Table-3 
        stratifies patients with renal scars according to age at the presentation. 
        There is a clear correlation between age and renal scars, which are significantly 
        more frequent in the group of patients over 5 years of age (p < 0.001).
 
 
   
 
   
 Of the 125 patients requiring surgery, 30% 
        (24/80) were from Group A, 30.2% (62/205) from Group B and 17.2% (39/226) 
        from Group C. When the number of surgical procedures is compared, a significant 
        difference is observed between Groups A and B compared to Group C (p = 
        0.003), with a clear decrease of surgical indications over time. In the 
        overall characteristics of patients (Table-4), severe cases of reflux 
        (IV and V) are observed in 19% of the children and the incidence of renal 
        injury is proportional do VUR grade, i.e., the more intensive the VUR, 
        the greater is the probability of developing scars. However, even low 
        grade VUR (I and II) was associated with renal scarring in this cohort.
 
 
   
 When the rates of spontaneous resolution 
        of reflux were analyzed for different grades of VUR throughout the medical 
        management, 87.5% (42/48) of the patients with VUR grade I; 77.6% (149/192) 
        of patients with VUR grade II and 52.8% (92/174) of patients with VUR 
        grade III had spontaneous resolution (Figure-3). Of the 74 patients with 
        VUR grade IV, spontaneous resolution was observed in 9 (12.2%) patients. 
        Only 1 patient with VUR grade V had spontaneous resolution during follow-up.
 There is no significant difference of spontaneous 
        resolution with clinical treatment when boys and girls are compared. The 
        resolution of VUR was not affected by age at entry. As to the laterality 
        of VUR, there was no significant difference of cure for unilateral or 
        bilateral VUR for grades I, II and III (p = 0.731; p = 0.344; p = 0.204, 
        respectively). However, for patients with VUR grade IV, there was spontaneous 
        resolution in 8 patients with unilateral (19%) disease and in only 1 case 
        of bilateral VUR (3.1%) (p = 0.068).
 The analysis of Kaplan-Meier curves (Figure-3) 
        showed a significant difference (p < 0.0001). Table-5 shows the probability 
        of spontaneous cure of VUR at 2 and 5 years of follow-up based on a transversal 
        section of the Kaplan-Meier curves.
 
 
   
 
    COMMENTS       Despite 
        the large number of children with reflux, management among urologists 
        is still controversial. One of the most debated aspects is the choice 
        between observation or surgical treatment. Although there is no consensus 
        for the treatment of VUR in childhood, several principles based on literature 
        data and corroborated by this study may be used as parameters when choosing 
        optimal therapy for each case.Chronic reflux nephropathy is a well known 
        and feared disease and is the cause of chronic renal failure in up to 
        25% of children undergoing dialysis and in 10 to 15% of adults waiting 
        for renal transplantation (7).
 Several factors are taken into consideration 
        when choosing therapy for VUR, such as: age, VUR grade, presence of renal 
        injury, history of urinary infections and tolerance to antibiotics. The 
        prevention of irreversible renal injury is the final goal of any of the 
        therapeutic modalities, and so far there is no evidence of the superiority 
        of clinical treatment over surgical therapy (8).
 Wheeler et al. (8) recently perform a meta-analysis 
        of seven trials with 833 evaluated patients comparing antibiotic prophylaxis 
        with combined surgery and antibiotics to obtain summary measures of treatment 
        effects. This systematic review of randomized controlled trials of interventions 
        for children with vesicoureteral reflux has identified a number of important 
        and unanswered questions. Most importantly, it is not clear whether any 
        intervention for children with primary vesicoureteral reflux does more 
        good than harm. Assuming intervention is beneficial, it is not clear whether 
        antibiotics alone or reimplantation surgery alone are most effective in 
        reducing the risk of urinary tract infection and renal parenchymal abnormality. 
        Furthermore, the trials, which have been undertaken comparing surgery 
        and antibiotics with antibiotics alone, have not shown any additional 
        benefit of surgery except for a reduction in risk of febrile urinary tract 
        infections.
 Because of the good results obtained with 
        clinical therapy using low dose antibiotics, in addition to the fact that 
        there are few prospective, randomized, studies comparing clinical treatment 
        to surgery (9-11), the large majority of children with VUR is clinically 
        treated. Thus, high rates of spontaneous resolution are obtained, which 
        depend especially on VUR grade and age at the time of diagnosis.
 The most frequent clinical abnormality leading 
        to the diagnosis of VUR is UTI. In our series, 85% of the children had 
        UTI as an early manifestation. Recent studies have shown that other causes, 
        such as antenatal hydronephrosis and voiding dysfunction have played a 
        larger role in the diagnosis of VUR (12). In the evaluation of International 
        Reflux Study in Children (IRSC) (10), UTI was observed in 89% to 92% of 
        children with VUR, and in approximately 30% of the cases there was some 
        degree of renal injury at the time of diagnosis.
 Of the 511 patients in this study, 98 (19.2%) 
        had renal scars at the time of diagnosis, and scarring was significantly 
        more frequent in patients with VUR grades IV and V (48.6% and 87% respectively). 
        Greenfield et al. (12), in a study with 1040 children, diagnosed renal 
        scarring in 13% of the cases, of which 22% did not have a prior history 
        of UTI. The stratification of patients in three different periods of time 
        according to the time of diagnosis (Groups A, B and C) allowed us to carry 
        out a critical analysis of the long-term outcome of VUR therapy. As occurs 
        in IRSC (10), most children in the first period of our study (98.7%) underwent 
        intravenous urography for the assessment of the upper urinary tract, and 
        this method was replaced by RUS and DMSA scan in the subsequent periods. 
        There was a clear change in the renal assessment of patients with VUR.
 The incidence of renal scarring at the time 
        of VUR diagnosis was 31.2% in the first period (Group A) against 13.7% 
        in the last group (Group C). A probable explanation for the high incidence 
        of renal scars in the first period (group A) is a combination of many 
        factors. First of all in the 1970s and early 1980s It was not a common 
        practice for infants following their first diagnosed UTI to be referred 
        to routine diagnostic imaging and we know that The likelihood of developing 
        renal scars depends on factors such as the number of symptomatic UTI and 
        the delay in their treatment. Actually the importance of prompt treatment 
        of urinary infection or symptomatic recurrence of UTI was emphasized to 
        local physicians. A second explanation is that patients admitted until 
        the end of the 80’s had a greater risk of UTI than children with 
        a diagnosis of VUR after 1990. Possibly, this fact reflects an improvement 
        in our understanding of the risk factors for UTI in this population, especially 
        the recognition and treatment of voiding dysfunction and constipation.
 In 24.5% (125/511) of the cases, surgical 
        procedures were carried out to repair VUR. Skoog et al. (13) and Greenfield 
        et al. (12), using similar indication criteria, reported 14% to 20% of 
        surgical treatment. The surgical indications decreased from 30%, in the 
        first period, to 17.2% in the last, following the currently used criteria. 
        This decrease is probably related to a better understanding of the disease 
        and more adequate follow-up of these children. Despite the excellent success 
        rates following antireflux surgery one has to bear in mind that surgery 
        only corrects the anatomical abnormality. The long-term outcome with regard 
        to renal function, urinary tract infections and arterial hypertension 
        does not differ significantly from the medication group.
 In our study, the Kaplan-Meier curves of 
        VUR resolution show a clear relationship between the possibility of cure 
        and the follow-up time, showing that VUR grades I and II were cured significantly 
        faster than grades III and IV. Other authors (8,14) have mentioned similar 
        results. The information regarding the probability of resolution is essential 
        when passing information onto the parents and choosing the best therapy 
        to be adopted. Our spontaneous cure results are in agreement with those 
        of other studies (15,16). Schawab et al. (8) have reported 83% and 76% 
        of spontaneous regression for grades I and II respectively. Tamminen-Mobius 
        et al. (17) obtained resolution in 63% of VUR grade II and 50% in grade 
        III. In our casuistic we obtained 87.5% of spontaneous cure for grade 
        I, 77.6% for grade II and 52.8% for grade III, when the follow-up period 
        is taken into consideration. The spontaneous resolution of VUR grade IV 
        with clinical therapy is known to be low. In our study, the expected probability 
        of cure at 5 years is only 12.2%. Results have shown a spontaneous cure 
        ranging from 9 to 16% in patients with VUR grade IV (13,16).
 The well-known association between vesicoureteral 
        reflux and urinary tract infection is the basis for pathophysiological 
        and therapeutic implications, which have dominated the literature on the 
        subject for the last 3 decades. The pathogenesis of renal damage in children 
        with VUR is controversial, as the exact role of UTI and pressure effects 
        of sterile reflux on the developing kidneys is still unknown.
 Primary VUR diagnosed after prenatal hydronephrosis 
        is usually severe and is often associated to a congenital renal scars, 
        which is primary and not the result of UTI. In our study diagnosis of 
        VUR resulting from antenatal hydronephrosis were observed only in 15 (3%) 
        children. This type of VUR affects male more than female infants and the 
        male predominance is thought to be secondary to a transient infravesical 
        obstruction during pregnancy. This specific group of children achieves 
        up to 43% of spontaneous cure for grades IV and V (18-20). Although in 
        the first type of reflux renal scarring is often present at diagnosis, 
        then probably congenital, it may always progress after UTI; hence the 
        importance of early diagnosis and careful follow-up in each infant with 
        primary VUR.
 Our results showed that the incidence of 
        reflux-related morbidity in children has significantly diminished over 
        the last three decades. In our country, the rates of reflux-related nephropathy 
        are much less than reported historically and are consistent with the most 
        recently reported international data.
 In our experience, and based on current 
        knowledge and guidelines, which derive from a thorough review of the literature 
        the recommendation of a treatment strategy for VUR is not, however, straightforward. 
        In deciding whether to recommend surgical correction of VUR, factors that 
        should be considered to include the previous and potential future morbidity 
        of VUR in that individual, the risk of uncorrected VUR, the likelihood 
        of spontaneous resolution or significant reduction in VUR, the efficacy 
        and complications of medical therapy, the morbidity and discomfort associated 
        to serial screening for VUR, the benefits and risks of surgical therapy, 
        and economic factors.
 The probability of spontaneous resolution 
        of VUR forms the basis of the decision to treat using antibiotic prophylaxis. 
        Undoubtedly, the most relevant finding in our clinical study is the rates 
        of spontaneous resolution in a large Brazilian cohort.
 Because the chance of spontaneous resolution 
        is as high as 87.5%, 77.6% and 52.8% in VUR grades I, II and III, respectively, 
        only exceptional cases should undergo primary surgical correction.
 The different procedures should be analyzed 
        for their costs in order to optimize the therapeutic strategy in different 
        health systems. An individualized strategy seems to be the ultimate goal 
        and should take into consideration the large number of issues.
  CONCLUSION       In 
        conclusion, urinary tract infection is still the major cause of VUR diagnosis. 
        However, early diagnosis and adequate treatment allowed a significantly 
        decrease of morbidity caused by renal injury. The currently employed clinical 
        treatment might be safely used in most of the cases. Spontaneous resolution 
        is directly related to VUR severity and is less likely to occur in grades 
        IV and V for which surgery is a more adequate alternative.  CONFLICT 
        OF INTEREST       None 
        declared.  REFERENCES 
	  
         Jodal 
          U, Koskimies O, Hanson E, Lohr G, Olbing H, Smellie J, et al.: Infection 
          pattern in children with vesicoureteral reflux randomly allocated to 
          operation or long-term antibacterial prophylaxis. The International 
          Reflux Study in Children. J Urol. 1992; 148: 1650-2. Wingen 
          AM, Koskimies O, Olbing H, Seppanen J, Tamminen-Mobius T: Growth and 
          weight gain in children with vesicoureteral reflux receiving medical 
          versus surgical treatment: 10-year results of a prospective, randomized 
          study. International Reflux Study in Children (European Branch). Acta 
          Paediatr. 1999; 88: 56-61. [No authors 
          listed]: Medical versus surgical treatment of primary vesicoureteral 
          reflux: report of the International Reflux Study Committee. Pediatrics. 
          1981; 67: 392-400. Smellie 
          JM: The intravenous urogram in the detection and evaluation of renal 
          damage following urinary tract infection. Pediatr Nephrol. 1995; 9: 
          213-9; discussion 219-20. Goldraich 
          NP, Ramos OL, Goldraich IH: Urography versus DMSA scan in children with 
          vesicoureteric reflux. Pediatr Nephrol. 1989; 3: 1-5. Merguerian 
          PA, Jamal MA, Agarwal SK, McLorie GA, Bagli DJ, Shuckett B, et al.: 
          Utility of SPECT DMSA renal scanning in the evaluation of children with 
          primary vesicoureteral reflux. Urology. 1999; 53: 1024-8. Bailey 
          RR, Mailing TMJ, Swainson CP: Vesicoureteric reflux and reflux nephropathy. 
          In: Scherier RW, Gottschalk CW (eds.), Disease of the Kidney, Fifth 
          edition. Boston, Litthe, Brown & Co. 1993; pp. 689-727. Wheeler 
          D, Vimalachandra D, Hodson EM, Roy LP, Smith G, Craig JC: Antibiotics 
          and surgery for vesicoureteric reflux: a meta-analysis of randomised 
          controlled trials. Arch Dis Child. 2003; 88: 688-94. Birminghan 
          Reflux Study Group: Prospective trial of operative versus non operative 
          traitement of severe vesico-ureteric reflux in children: five years 
          observation. Brit Med J. 1987; 295: 237-41. Weiss 
          R, Tamminen-Mobius T, Koskimies O, Olbing H, Smellie JM, Hirche H, et 
          al.: Characteristics at entry of children with severe primary vesicoureteral 
          reflux recruited for a multicenter, international therapeutic trial 
          comparing medical and surgical management. The International Reflux 
          Study in Children. J Urol. 1992; 148: 1644-9. Scholtmeijer 
          RJ: Treatment of vesicoureteric reflux: results after 3 years in a prospective 
          study. Child Nephrol Urol. 1991; 11: 29-32. Greenfield 
          SP, Ng M, Wan J: Experience with vesicoureteral reflux in children: 
          clinical characteristics. J Urol. 1997; 158: 574-7. Chand 
          DH, Rhoades T, Poe SA, Kraus S, Strife CF: Incidence and severity of 
          vesicoureteral reflux in children related to age, gender, race and diagnosis. 
          J Urol. 2003; 170: 1548-50. Skoog 
          SJ, Belman AB, Majd M: A nonsurgical approach to the management of primary 
          vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol. 1987; 138: 941-6. Elder 
          JS, Peters CA, Arant BS Jr, Ewalt DH, Hawtrey CE, Hurwitz RS, et al.: 
          Pediatric Vesicoureteral Reflux Guidelines Panel summary report on the 
          management of primary vesicoureteral reflux in children. J Urol. 1997; 
          157: 1846-51. Arant 
          BS Jr: Medical management of mild and moderate vesicoureteral reflux: 
          followup studies of infants and young children. A preliminary report 
          of the Southwest Pediatric Nephrology Study Group. J Urol. 1992; 148: 
          1683-7. Tamminen-Mobius 
          T, Brunier E, Ebel KD, Lebowitz R, Olbing H, Seppanen U, et al.: Cessation 
          of vesicoureteral reflux for 5 years in infants and children allocated 
          to medical treatment. The International Reflux Study in Children. J 
          Urol. 1992; 148: 1662-6. Duckett 
          JW: Vesicoureteral reflux: a ‘conservative’ analysis. Am 
          J Kidney Dis. 1983; 3: 139-44. Yeung 
          CK, Godley ML, Dhillon HK, Gordon I, Duffy PG, Ransley PG: The characteristics 
          of primary vesico-ureteric reflux in male and female infants with pre-natal 
          hydronephrosis. Br J Urol. 1997; 80: 319-27. Sillen 
          U, Hjalmas K, Aili M, Bjure J, Hanson E, Hansson S: Pronounced detrusor 
          hypercontractility in infants with gross bilateral reflux. J Urol. 1992; 
          148: 598-9. ____________________Accepted 
        after revision:
 October 20, 2006
 _______________________Correspondence address:
 Dr. Adriano Almeida Calado
 Rua Conselheiro Portela, 285 / 602
 Recife, PE, 52020-030, Brazil
 E-mail: caladourologia@yahoo.com.br
 |