|
STONE
DISEASE
Secondary
signs of non-enhanced CT prior to laser ureterolithotripsy: is treatment
outcome predictable?
Seitz C, Memarsadeghi M, Fajkovic H, Tanovic E
Rohrbacher Str. 8, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
J Endourol. 2008; 22: 415-8
- Purpose:
To correlate the presence of secondary signs of non-enhanced computed
tomography (NECT) in renal units harboring ureteral calculi with intraoperative
findings and treatment outcome after holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet
laser (Ho:YAG) ureterolithotripsy.
- Subjects
and Methods: Two-hundred patients were prospectively included
after ureteral calculi were detected on NECT. All patients underwent
Ho:YAG ureterolithotripsy at the Medical University of Vienna. All CT
studies were reviewed by one specialized uroradiologist blinded to pre-
and postoperative parameters for secondary signs as renal enlargement,
perinephric stranding, ureteral dilation, periureteral edema, and ureteral
rim sign. The impact of secondary signs on intraoperatively-verified
impaction and treatment outcome was evaluated.
-
Results:
Of the 200 patients 85 (42.5%) harbored proximal and 115 (57.5%) harbored
distal ureteral calculi. The stone-free rates for proximal and distal
calculi were 80% and 97%, respectively. Although proximal stone location
and intraoperatively-verified impaction correlated significantly with
stone-free rates (P < 0.0001, P = 0.01), the presence of secondary
signs could not predict intraoperatively-verified stone impaction or
stone-free rates (renal enlargement: P = 0.2, P = 0.5; perinephric stranding:
P = 0.7, P = 0.5; ureteral dilation: P = 0.7, P = 0.7; periureteral
edema: P = 0.8, P = 0.06; ureteral rim sign: P = 0.8, P = 0.3).
-
Conclusion:
Preoperative secondary signs seen on NECT in patients harboring ureteral
calculi do not correlate with intraoperative findings of impaction,
and do not predict treatment outcome after Ho:YAG ureterolithotripsy.
- Editorial
Comment
Previous studies have demonstrated that patients with secondary signs
of obstruction on CT scan imaging are more likely to require surgical
intervention. It would be helpful if CT scan findings could predict
the success rate with ureteroscopic lithotripsy. As such, the success
rates are high and complication rates uncommon with Holmium laser lithotripsy,
therefore the likelihood of identifying preoperative prognostic factors
is low.
The low level of success with proximal ureteral stones could be related
to the reliance on semi-rigid ureteroscopy in this study - the addition
of flexible ureteroscopes and stone retrieval devices may have helped
improve success rates. As such, the impact of proximal ureteral stone
location and endoscopic evidence of impaction may warrant further evaluation
using these two modalities.
The authors report that over one-third of patients had stone impaction
at the time of ureteroscopy, as defined by adherence to the ureteral
wall necessitating detachment with the Holmium laser. In our experience,
the risk of impaction appears related to the duration of symptoms and
obstructions. Indeed, it is surprising that such a high rate of impaction
was detected as the median time to intervention was only 2 days after
imaging.
Dr.
Manoj Monga
Professor, Department of Urology
University of Minnesota
Edina, Minnesota, USA
E-mail: endourol@yahoo.com |