SERUM LEVELS OF TOTAL ACID PHOSPHATASE, PROSTATIC ACID
PHOSPHATASE, TOTAL AND FREE PROSTATE-SPECIFIC
ANTIGEN IN PATIENTS WITHIN CHRONIC HEMODIALYSIS PROGRAM

Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey

ABSTRACT

     Objective: To investigate the effect of terminal renal failure with chronic hemodialysis on prostatic disease markers [total acid phosphatase (TAP), prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and free prostate-specific antigen (fPSA)].
     Patients and Method: Total acid phosphatase (TAP), prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and free prostate-specific antigen (fPSA) were measured in 28 patients over 40 years of age on terminal renal failure with chronic hemodialysis. Correlation was calculated between the dialysis duration and prostatic disease marker levels.
     Results: There was no evidence of artefactual elevation of prostatic disease markers. TAP, PAP, PSA and fPSA levels were in the normal range in all of the patients. However, PSA and fPSA levels decreased as the dialysis duration increased.
     Conclusion: Prostatic disease markers were useful in the routine screening of men receiving long-term dialysis, but the clinicians should be on alert when the dialysis duration increases.

Key Words: prostate; cancer; prostatic markers; hemodialysis
Braz J Urol, 27: 133-135, 2001

INTRODUCTION

     Serum concentrations of total acid phosphatase (TAP), prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and free prostate-specific antigene (fPSA) are commonly used as a marker of prostatic disease. PSA is a 33000-dalton glycoprotein and as many other glycoproteins are know to accumulate in end-stage renal failure this might possibly cause on artefactual increase in prostatic disease markers, with a high incidence of false positive results in patients with renal insufficiency.
     Kidney and liver may play a role in the elimination of free PSA (f-PSA) from blood stream. Kiliç et al. also demonstrated that a limited liver reserve is sufficient to maintain serum f-PSA and total PSA (t-PSA) levels within normal ranges (1).
     Previous studies have shown that PSA is not eliminated by hemodialysis and others note that PSA levels increased after dialysis (2,3). The purpose of this study was to evaluate hemodialysis have any effect on prostatic disease markers such as PSA, fPSA, TAP, PAP and to determine the effect of dialysis duration upon those markers which has never been discussed in the literature.
     We have therefore, addressed this question by measuring prostatic markers in patients receiving long-term dialysis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

     Twenty-eight patients on chronic hemodialysis were included in the study. Patients were all men over 40 years of age (mean 55, range 41-69). Lower urinary tract symptoms were evaluated in all patients and controls. Besides, urine analysis and digital rectal examination were performed . Transrectal ultrasound examination was done in men with t-PSA values greater than 4 ng/ml (Toshiba, Tosbee, 7.5 mhz transrectally probe). Men with lower urinary tract symptoms, urinary tract infections and suspicious digital rectal examination were excluded from the study.
     Mean dialysis time for all patients 3.2 years (range 6 month -18 years). The patients daily urinary output ranged between 100 and 700 ml. A low-flux capillary dialyzer with cellulose diacetate membrane was used and hemodialysis was performed in 3 session per week. Blood and dialysate flow rates were 250-300 and 500 ml/min, respectively. According to duration of dialysis, all patients were divided in to three group. Group I was 0-2 years, group II was 2-4 years, group III was 4 years and over.
     Serum prostatic markers were measured immediately before hemodialysis; serum PSA and free PSA levels were measured by chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay by using Immulite Analyzer (DPC, Diagnostic Product Corporation, USA). Normal range total PSA 0-4 ng/ml, free PSA 0.1-0.25 ng/ml. Serum TAP and PAP levels were determined by enzymatic colorimetric methods (p-Nitrophenylphosphate, L-Tartarate; Pointine Scientific Inc., USA) on a TARGA 3000 autoanalyzer (Italy). Normal range of serum TAP 2.5- 11.7 U/L, serum PAP 0.2-3.5 U/L. Data were analyzed with Spearman correlation test.

RESULTS

     TAP [mean 3.4 U/L,(normal: 2.5-11.7 U/L)], PAP [mean 1.7 U/L (normal: 0.2-3.5 U/L)], t-PSA [mean 1.13 ng/ml (normal: 0-4 ng/ml)] and f-PSA [mean 0.17 ng/ml (normal: 0.1-0.25 ng/ml)] levels were in the normal range in all of the patients. Table-1 summarizes the prostatic disease markers values in age-matched groups.There was no significance difference among the age groups in terms of prostatic disease markers.



     Total dialysis duration showed a negative correlation with serum PSA and fPSA levels (r: -0.49, p < 0.01 and r: -0.40, p < 0.04).
     PSA and fPSA levels decreased as the dialysis duration increased in patients receiving long-term dialysis (Table-2).


DISCUSSION

     Prostate-specific antigen is a serine protease produced by both benign and malignant prostatic epithelium and widely used as a clinical maker of prostate cancer (4,5). PSA is more sensitive than total acid phosphatase and prostatic acid phosphatase in the detection of prostate cancer and, therefore, will be more useful in monitoring responses and recurrence after therapy.
     It has been well recognised that serum PSA corelated with advancing patient age. Oesterling et al. (6) and Dalkin et al. (7) have recommended adjustment of the upper normal limit of serum PSA for advancing age.
     Tumor markers play an important role in the assessment of patients with some types of malignant disease. The effects of several disease on the PSA have been studied in the recent years. Several investigators have compared pre and post dialysis serum total PSA, free PSA and free/total PSA ratio.
     Kabalin showed that there was no detectable PSA in the urine obtained from the renal pelvis. They have assessed that the serum level of total PSA was not changed after hemodialysis significantly (8). Danýþman et al. in their series; observed that serum tPSa and fPSA levels did not significantly change after hemodialysis (9). 66% of men undergoing renal transplantation were over 40 years of age and 10% of the patients with chronic renal disease were over 60 years of age (10). It is likely that some of these patients will develop prostatic disease. Comparisons among age-matched patients had no significant differences in the mean PSA levels.
     In this present study, no evidence of prostatic cancer has developed in these patients over 40 years of age with end stage renal failure. The measurement of prostatic markers used were in the normal range. These findings indicated that neither renal impairment nor chronic hemodialysis cause a artefactual elevation of prostatic disease markers.
     The effects of total dialysis duration on prostatic disease markers have not been studied before in the literature, tPSA and fPSA levels decreased as the dialysis duration increased in patients receiving long term hemodialysis.
     In our study it is speculated that this negative correlation may cause some delay in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. However long term follow-up and pathologically confirmed studies are needed to clarify the duration of hemodialysis on tumor markers of the patients with prostate cancer.
     In conclusion tPSA, fPSA, TAP and PAP can be used to screen patients on dialysis, althoug they should be used with caution in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in long term chronic hemodialysis patients.

REFERENCES

  1. Kiliç S, Güntekin E, Danisman A, Kukul E, Sevük M: Serum free and total prostate-specific antigen levels in patients with liver disease. Urology, 52: 825-828, 1998.
  2. Monath JR, Burkart JM, Freedman BI, Pittaway DE, Russell GB, Assimos DG: Effects of hemodialysis on prostate spesific antigen. Urology, 42: 398-400, 1993.
  3. Sasagawa I, Nakada T, Hashimoto T, Ishigooka M, Kubota Y, Hirona K: Serum prostatic phosphatase, gamma-seminoprotein and prostatic specific antigen in hemodialysis patients. Int Urol, 48: 181-183, 1992.
  4. Carter HB, Pearson DJ, Matter JE, Brant LJ, Chan DW, Andres R, Fozard JL, Walsh PC: Longitudinal evaluation of prostate-specific antigen levels in men with and without prostate disease. JAMA,267: 2215-2220, 1992.
  5. Wang MC, Valenzuela LA, Murph GP, Chu TM: Purification of human prostate-specific antigen. Invest Urol, 17: 159-166, 1979.
  6. Oesterling JE, Jacobsen SJ, Chute CG, Guess HA, Girman CJ, Panser LA, Lieber MM: Serum prostate-specific antigen in a community-based population of healthymen: Establishment of age-specific reference ranges. JAMA, 270: 860-864, 1993.
  7. Dalkin BL, Ahman FR, Kopp JB: Prostate-specific antigen levels in men older than 50 years without clinical evidence of prostatic carcinoma. J Urol, 150: 1837-1839, 1993.
  8. Kabalin JN, Hornberger JC: Prostate-specific antigen is not excreted by human kidney or eliminated by routine hemodialysis. Urology, 37: 308-310, 1991.
  9. Daniþman A, Kiliç S, Kukul E, Yakupoglu G, Güntekin E, Baykara M, Sevük M: Do renal failure and hemodialysis have effect on the elimination of free and total prostate-specific antigen? Eur Urol, 37: 579-581, 2000.
  10. Morton JJ, Howe SF, Lowell JA: Influence of end stage renal disease and renal transplantation on serum prostate-specific antigen. Br J Urol, 75: 498, 1992.


______________________
Received: October 9, 2000
Accepted after revision: March 22, 2001


_______________________
Correspondence address:
Dr. Bilal Gümüs
School of Medicine, Department of Urology
Celal Bayar University, 45010 Manisa, Turkey
Fax: + + (0) (236) 237 02 13
E-mail: bhgumus@ixir.com