RE:
PENETRATING URETERAL TRAUMA
(
Download pdf )
GUSTAVO P. FRAGA,
GUSTAVO M. BORGES, MARIO MANTOVANI, UBIRAJARA FERREIRA, TIAGO L. LAURITO,
NELSON R. NETTO JR
Division
of Trauma Surgery, School of Medicine, State University of Campinas, Unicamp,
Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Int
Braz J Urol, 33: 142-150, 2007
To the Editor:
Penetrating
ureteral injuries from external violence is rare, as evidenced by this
report of 20 reported injuries over an 8 year period from Sao Paulo by
Fraga et al. This article is another in a long line of papers, emphasizing
that a high index of suspicion is needed to reliably diagnose ureteral
injuries. Again, the majority of penetrating ureteral injuries are diagnosed
intra-operatively, with direct exploration the most accurate method. Ureteral
peristalsis is not a reliable indication of viability or of adequate vascularity.
The most reliable way to determine ureteral viability is by incision and
monitoring for a bleeding edge. Intravenous indigo carmine is also helpful
in identifying ureteral injury by extravasation of blue dye from the injury
site. Another method to test ureteral integrity is by cystotomy and retrograde
injection of blue dye by pediatric feeding tube.
Although none of the patients studied here
underwent imaging prior to surgical exploration, intravenous urography
is often the primary imaging study employed to evaluate ureteral integrity,
yet results can be very variable. IVU findings suggestive of ureteral
injury are incomplete visualization of the entire ureter, ureteral deviation
or dilatation, urinary extravasation, hydronephrosis, and delayed or non-visualization
of the injured renal unit. One-shot IVU, however, has little value for
assessing ureteral integrity. (1)
For the unstable patient, the method of
“damage control” was not employed or mentioned in this article
on ureteral injuries. Typically, when the patient is too unstable to undergo
lengthy ureteral reconstruction, a “damage control” approach
of temporary cutaneous ureterostomy over a single “J” ureteral
stent or pediatric feeding tube should be performed (2). An alternative
method of last resort is ureteral ligation, proximal to the injury, followed
by a percutaneous nephrostomy tube when stable. Intraoperative placement
of a nephrostomy tube is time consuming and more difficult then one appreciates
– it should be avoided. Definitive reconstruction is delayed until
the patient has stabilized from his other injuries.
References
1. Brandes SB, Chelsky MJ, Buckman RF, Hanno PM: Ureteral injuries from
penetrating trauma. J Trauma. 1994; 36: 766-9.
2. Coburn M: Damage control and urologic injuries. Surg Clin N Am. 1997;
77: 821-34.
Dr.
Steven B. Brandes
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Surgery
St Louis, Missouri, USA
E-mail: brandess@wudosis.wustl.edu
|