|
STONE
DISEASE
Preventing
Migration of Stones during Fragmentation with Thermosensitive Polymer
Sacco D, McDougal WS, Schwarz A
Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
J Endourol. 2007; 21: 504-7
- Purpose:
To
define a method of stabilizing stones during extracorporeal (SWL) and
intracorporeal lithotripsy with a thermosensitive polymer.
-
Materials and Methods:
Using a thermosensitive polymer that is either a liquid or a gel, depending
on the temperature, both calcium oxalate and plaster of Paris phantom
stones were placed in the polymer gel or saline, and SWL was performed.
Comparisons were made between the effectiveness of the fragmentation
in the two media. Also, in-vivo studies using the polymer to prevent
migration of ureteral stones were performed in swine. Electrohydraulic
lithotripsy was used on a small stone implanted in the distal ureter
with the polymer instilled proximally. Once in the ureter, the polymer
converted to a gel. After completion of the procedure, the polymer was
restored to a liquid form by infusion of cold saline and expelled from
the ureter. Three of the pigs underwent treatment of the stone, convalesced
for 7 days, and then had urine collections from both ureters to compare
the glomerular filtration rates, fractional sodium excretion, urine/plasma
creatinine ratio, and urine/plasma urea ratio on the treated and the
contralateral (control) sides.
-
Results:
The polymer did not enhance fragmentation when used with SWL but prevented
stone migration in the in-vivo studies. The physiologic parameters were
not significantly different on the treated and the control sides. The
polymer was easily removed from the ureter by infusing cold water.
-
Conclusion:
The use of this thermosensitive polymer proximal to ureteral stones
prevents migration and is not traumatic to the ureter.
- Editorial
Comment
The authors describe the use of a novel thermosensitive polymer to stabilize
calculi during endourological procedures. The technique was not successful
in an in vitro model of ESWL. Previous studies have demonstrated inhibition
of stone fragmentation by ESWL when a mineral oil medium surrounds the
stone. It is thought to occur by interference with the cavitation effects
of ESWL, and a similar effect may occur with the new polymer evaluated
in this study.
The authors did not evaluate the upper collecting system acutely after
intracorporeal lithotripsy in the porcine model. This is an important
step to be able to conclude that the polymer did not migrate into the
renal pelvis or calyces. Was this to occur, the patient may experience
transient obstruction until the polymer dissolved 2 hours later.
Clinical applications of this polymer would require the use of warmed
endoscopic irrigation fluid to prevent dissolution of the polymer. It
would be important to evaluate the toxicity of combustion by-products
of the polymer to determine what might be anticipated if it were inadvertently
targeted with the holmium laser. It would also be important to evaluate
interactions of the polymer with a ureteral stent left post-operatively
– could this impact polymer dissolution?
As such, the polymer holds promise as a method to prevent stone migration
during ureteroscopy. One would need to quantify the volume of polymer
required, which may vary based on the degree of ureteral dilation above
the calculus. One might propose that the polymer could facilitate stone
fragment retrieval during PCNL.
Dr.
Manoj Monga
Professor, Department of Urology
University of Minnesota
Edina, Minnesota, USA
E-mail: endourol@yahoo.com |