|
ENDOUROLOGY
& LAPAROSCOPY
doi: 10.1590/S1677-553820100003000017
Transperitoneal
laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for patients with dialysis-dependent
end-stage renal disease: an analysis and comparison of perioperative outcome
Bird VG, Shields JM, Aziz M, De Los Santos R, Ayyathurai R, Ciancio G
Department of Urology, Division of Transplantation, University of Miami
Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
Urology. 2010; 75: 1335-42
- Objectives:
To evaluate LRN as treatment for high risk patients. Laparoscopic radical
nephrectomy (LRN) is performed for renal tumors not amenable to nephron-sparing
treatments. Indications are increasing to include higher risk patients
including those with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) necessitating dialysis.
Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of a patient cohort with
clinical stage T1 renal tumors undergoing transperitoneal LRN. Parameters
examined included patient demographics, medical comorbidities, tumor
characteristics, operative outcomes, and complications.
Results: One hundred eighty-nine patients underwent 195 LRN. Sixteen
patients (8.5%) had preexistent ESRD requiring dialysis. A higher American
Society of Anesthiologists score (P<.05), higher age-adjusted Charlson
comorbidity index (P=.003), higher incidence of previous abdominal surgery
(P=.012), and higher incidence of hypertension (P=.025) were found for
the ESRD group. Mean blood loss was 153.0 and 132.0 mL (P=.71) in the
ESRD patients and non-ESRD patients, respectively. A longer stay (P=.02)
was noted for ESRD patients. Mean tumor size in the ESRD patients and
non-ESRD patients was 2.6 and 4.2 cm (P<.05), respectively. Renal
cell carcinoma was the most common pathology in 14 of 20 (70.0%) ESRD
patient renal units and 167 of 175 (95.4%) non-ESRD patient renal units
(P=.001). Intraoperative and postoperative complication rates were 6.3%
and 31.3% respectively for ESRD patients (P=.05), and 8.7% and 21.4%
respectively for non-ESRD patients (P=.35). Most postoperative complications
were minor.
Conclusions: LRN, for the treatment of renal tumors in ESRD patients
requiring dialysis, is feasible and safe with acceptable intraoperative
and postoperative complication rates.
- Editorial
Comment
Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) has become standard of care for
renal tumors not amenable to nephron-sparing surgery. LRN is a safe
procedure associated with low morbidity for treatment of renal cell
carcinoma.
The authors report their experience with LRN as treatment modality for
renal masses in high-risk patients. Particularly, patients with end-stage
renal disease (ESRD) requiring hemodialysis demonstrated little to no
wound complications. Moreover, the authors demonstrated that papillary
subtype RCC was more frequent in the ESRD than the non-ESRD population
(30% ESRD versus 13.1% of non-ESRD patients).
The transperitoneal laparoscopic approach has shown to be safe and effective
to manage high-risk patients with different techniques of CO2 insufflation.
Dr.
Fernando J. Kim
Chief of Urology, Denver Health Med. Ctr.
Associate Professor, Univ. Colorado Health Sci. Ctr.
Director of Minimally Invasive Urol. Oncology, UCHSC
Denver, Colorado, USA
E-mail: fernando.kim@dhha.org
|