|
THE
IMPACT OF PRIOR PROSTATIC SURGERY ON URINARY CONTINENCE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING
ORTHOTOPIC ILEAL NEOBLADDER
(
Download pdf )
HOMERO O. DE ARRUDA,
RUBENS SUAREZ, MIGUEL SROUGI, ADRIANO A. DE PAULA, JOSÉ CURY
Division
of Urology, Paulista School of Medicine, Federal University of Sao Paulo,
UNIFESP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
ABSTRACT
Objective:
To establish if previous surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia (transurethral
resection of the prostate or open prostatectomy), age, and preservation
of prostatic apex can influence postoperative urinary continence in patients
submitted to radical cystectomy and orthotopic ileal neobladder.
Patients and Methods: We analyzed 62 patients
with bladder cancer who were treated with radical cystectomy and orthotopic
ileal neobladder between 1987 and 1998 and had been followed for at least
24 months. The average age and median follow up were 61 years and 53 months,
respectively. Postoperative urinary continence was correlated with 3 factors:
patient age, preservation of prostatic apex during surgical excision and
prior prostatic surgery for benign disease. Patients were defined as incontinent
when they had to use more than 1 protective pad at the daytime.
Results: The overall incidence of urinary
incontinence was 12.9% (8 out of 62 patients). The only statistically
significant factor that impacted upon urinary continence was previous
prostatic surgery, with respectively 33% versus 7% rate of incontinence
for patients previously operated on and for those without previous operation
(p = 0.023 odds ratio = 6.5, 95% confidence interval). Preservation of
prostatic apex did not reach difference, 12% versus 13%, for those with
and without preservation, and age also did not influence the postoperative
continence rate.
Conclusions: Prior prostatic surgery for
benign prostatic hyperplasia probably can increases the risk for postcystectomy
incontinence and preservation of prostate apex did not affect the continence
rate. This issue deserves to be considered by the surgeon and must be
discussed previously with the patients when planning an orthotopic bladder
replacement.
Key
words: bladder; bladder neoplasms; urinary diversion; urinary
reservoirs; continence
Int Braz J Urol. 2003; 29: 502-506
INTRODUCTION
Radical
cystectomy remains the golden standard for the treatment of invasive bladder
cancer. In the last 10 to 15 years, significant surgical advances have
been reached for urinary diversion following radical cystectomy, leading
to an increased number of patients that have been subjected to an orthotopic
ileal neobladder. As the result of improved clinical staging, earlier
patient acceptance for radical surgery and improved postoperative support,
there has been a significant decrease in the morbidity and mortality of
these cases (1, 2)
According to the pioneer work of Le Duc
& Camey (2), the principle of bladder replacement with ileum and the
preservation of the distal urethral sphincter allowing urinary continence
have shown to be technically feasible with an acceptable level of morbidity
(3). Also, the principle of bowel detubularization used in the ileal Kock
pouch (4) led to an improvement in the capacity/pressure ratio of the
ileal reservoirs, making the technique more efficient and popularizing
its use. A great number of different techniques for bladder substitution
have been proposed in the last years, using the same basic principles:
a high capacity and compliant reservoir with low pressure to preserve
the integrity of the upper urinary tract and reconstruction that avoids
ureteral reflux or obstruction. This advance promoted better urinary continence
and more physiological micturition improving the patient’s quality
of life (5), which are crucially important for surgery acceptance in this
patient subset.
In the present work, we studied daytime
urinary continence in patients with orthotopic ileal neobladder and its
relationship to age, prostatic apex preservation, and prior surgery for
benign prostatic hyperplasia.
PATIENTS AND
METHODS
A
retrospective study of the charts from 62 patients with bladder cancer
treated at the Federal University of São Paulo Medical School between
1987 and 1998 was performed. Only patients who were alive and followed
for at least 24 months were included. The patients’ age and postoperative
follow up period ranged from 44 to 78 years (median = 61 years) and from
24 to 122 months (median = 53 months) respectively.
All patients had clinical stage T2 –
T3 disease or irressectable superficial bladder carcinoma and underwent
radical cystectomy and orthotopic ileal neobladder using 40 - 45 cm of
detubularized ileum with a “J” configuration. The same surgeon
using the same technique (6) performed all surgical procedures. In the
male group, 38 patients were submitted to classical cystoprostatectomy
with the anastomosis of the distal urethra to the most pendent portion
of the ileal neobladder. In 24 patients, the prostatic apex was preserved,
with removal of the proximal 2/3 of the prostate gland. In the latter
group the preserved distal prostate gland was anastomosed to the ileal
reservoir and in all male patients, efforts were made to spare the cavernous
neurovascular bundles. Postoperative staging revealed 5 patients p T0
N0, 11 patients pTa - pT1 N0 M0, 38 patients pT2 - pT3 N0 M0 and 8 patients
pT2 - pT3 N1 M0.
Three risk factors for urinary incontinence
following surgery were evaluated, including patient’s age, preservation
of the prostatic apex at surgery and prior prostatic surgery (transurethral
resection or open prostatectomy) for benign hyperplasia. Urinary incontinence
was defined as the need for more than 1 protective pad per day during
daytime after at least 2 years following operation (3).
RESULTS
Eight
out of 62 patients (12.9%) had persistent diurnal urinary incontinence
after 2 years. The correlation between the possible risk factors and urinary
incontinence is shown in the Table-1. All the values were submitted to
a Fischer’s exact test.
When considering patients’ age, those
who were 70 years old or more had a higher incidence of urinary incontinence
compared to younger patients (18% versus 10%) but this difference did
not reach statistic significance (p = 0.604 and odds ratio - OR = 0.52).
Preservation of the prostatic apex showed similar results with 3/24 (12%)
and 5/38 (13%) of the incontinence rate (OR = 0.94, p = 1). From the 3
risk factors studied, the unique significant predictor for urinary incontinence
was previous prostatic surgery. Previous prostate surgery was possible
to be checked in only 57 patients, with transurethral prostate resection
performed in 48 and open prostatectomy in 9. This group demonstrated in
the outcome a 33% urinary incontinence rate versus 7% for the non-operated
group (p= 0.023 and OR = 6.5 with confidence interval - CI = 95%).
COMMENTS
In
the present study 54/62 (79.1%) of the patients have diurnal continence
according to our criteria and these figures were comparable to other published
series where postoperative urinary continence ranged from 60% to 96% (1,3,5,7-9).
In order to maintain erectile function and urinary continence, Schlling
& Friesen (10) since 1987, had already been made routine diagnostic
staging of the cancer with transurethral resection of the prostate to
permit a transprostatic selective cystectomy with an ileal bladder, cutting
through the apex of the prostate thus, leaving a wide funnel-shaped tunnel
of the prostatic urethra, for the anastomosis with the M or W shaped ileal
reservoir. They achieve after a training period of 3 months, a frequency
of miction of 3-4 times during the day and once during the night and all
patients continent day and night. Park & Montie (6), in 1998, studying
the possible causes for incontinence following cystectomy and orthotopic
neobladder noticed loss of primary failure-to-empty problem in 1/3 of
the cases due to low pouch compliance or high-pressure bowel contraction
waves. Failure-to-store as a result of either urethral sphincter dysfunction
secondary to surgical damage and inadequate length of the proximal urethra
or compliance of the reservoir were found in the remaining 2/3 of the
cases. In 1999, Hautmann (3) studied the recovery of urinary continence
following radical cystectomy in 363 patients who had urinary reconstruction
through an ileal neobladder and were followed for a median of 57 months
(range 10 to 137). The rate of incontinence decreased over time from 8%
to 4% up to 5 years, the point when there was no further improvement in
urinary continence.
Gasparini et al. (11) studied continence
after radical cystoprostatectomy and compared with patients continent
after radical prostatectomy. In both groups, surgical techniques were
modified to optimize preservation of the periurethral tissue and the prostatic
apex. For the ileal neobladder group, 90% were completely continent. The
urethral sphincter mechanism was well preserved in these patients, with
no significant difference between the 2 groups, neither in functional
urethral length or in maximal urethral closure pressure. They concluded
that continence is dependent upon an intact urethral sphincter mechanism
as well as compliant and low-pressure reservoir; preserving as much of
the distal urethral sphincter as possible may minimize either bladder
or bladder substitute and incontinence. With the same objective and to
determine the impact of preserving the prostatic apex on continence in
these patients, Koraitim et al. (5) concluded that this preservation did
not improve urinary continence and even, may present an element obstructing
the evacuation of ileal neobladders. Recently, to minimize the risk of
incontinence some authors (11-15) suggest cystectomy with prostate sparing,
although careful selection of the patients is mandatory to exclude occult
prostate cancer. With this strategy, 90 - 97% are fully continent (no
pad) during the day and 95% void 1 to 2 times at night to stay dry (14).
Certainly, preserving the prostatic apex
is easier to do and in accordance to the literature, we were expecting
less incontinence, because the dissection beyond the sphincter could preserve
the anatomic and functional integrity. Nonetheless, our study suggests
that preserving the prostatic apex only, aiming to spare the distal urinary
sphincter, did not decrease urinary incontinence rate. Incontinence varies
from 13% to 12% respectively, for those without and with preservation
of the apex, in the orthotopic neobladders. These findings has obvious
clinical implications, since preservation of the distal part of the prostate
in some cases can increase local bleeding during operation and may eventually
interfere with neobladder emptying in the future (5). In case the results
are really similar, there are more reasons to remove the prostate completely.
Surprisingly, when comparing the results
of continence between patients with and without previous prostate surgery,
there was a high proportion on continents (93%) in those who were not
operated (39/42), in contrast to the 66% of the previous operated group
(10/15). Unfortunately, it was only possible to check that from the 57
patients, 48 were submitted to a transurethral resection and 9 to an open
simple prostatectomy. The real mechanisms that explain the higher incidence
of incontinence in patients with prior history of prostate surgery undergoing
radical cystectomy and orthotopic ileal neobladder were not determined
in our study, but we can conceive 3 possible factors: 1) direct damage
of the external sphincter during prostatic surgery, 2) fibrosis of the
membranous urethra secondary to the surgical healing process or chronic
prostatitis, 3) chronic external sphincter dysfunction secondary to its
increased work following internal sphincter loss imposed by the previous
prostatic surgery. Probably, as 85% of the patients had had transurethral
resection it is easier to suppose that an intrinsic problem of the urethra
at the sphincter level might have previously occurred. Furthermore, other
studies on this issue and the neuromuscular participation of the prostatic
apex in the mechanism of continence are necessary to clear the real cause
of the problem.
In conclusion, according to our findings,
we can theorize that patients submitted to prostatic surgery may be predisposed
to urinary incontinence after orthotopic bladder replacement. Reviewing
the literature, we did not find previous studies evaluating the role of
prostatic surgery as a major risk factor for urinary incontinence in such
patients. Even though we do not have the correct answers, it makes sense
to take into account the need to preserve the prostatic apex during radical
cystectomy with the scope of improving urinary continence as recently
proposed (15). Finally, similarly to what happens with patients submitted
to radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (16), age had no significant
influence on urinary continence outcome following cystoprostatectomy,
although with such small values, the chi-square p value is not accurate
and we would need more patients to define it precisely.
Urologist and patients must acknowledge
whatever adverse mechanism plays a role in these patients, the fact that
past history of prostatic surgery for benign disease can increase the
risk of urinary incontinence. This subset of patients must be advised
when cystectomy and an orthotopic ileal neobladder are being considered
for the treatment of invasive bladder cancer. Further prospective and
randomized studies with separated groups correlating previous prostates
surgery to a higher risk of urinary incontinence should be performed,
in order to confirm our findings and lead to more appropriate care to
patients with invasive bladder cancer.
REFERENCES
- Bachor R, Frohneberg G, Miller K, Egghart G, Hautmann R: Continence
after total bladder replacement: urodynamic analysis of the ileal neobladder.
Br J Urol. 1990; 65: 462-6.
- Le Duc A, Camey M: A procedure for avoiding reflux in uretero-ileal
implantation during enterocystoplasty. J Urol. 1979; 85: 449-54.
- Hautmann RE, de Petriconi R, Gottfried HW, Kleinschmidt K, Mattes
R, Paiss T: The ileal neobladder: complications and functional results
in 363 patients after 11 years of follow-up. J Urol. 1999; 161: 422-7.
- Kock NG, Nilson AE, Nilsson LO, Norlen LJ, Philipson BM: Urinary
diversion via a continent ileal reservoir: clinical results in 12 patients.
J Urol. 1982; 128: 469-75.
- Koraitim MM, Atta MA, Foda MK: Impact of the prostatic apex on continence
and urinary flow in patients with intestinal neobladder. Br J Urol.
1996; 78: 534-6.
- Park JM, Montie JE: Mechanisms of incontinence and retention after
orthotopic neobladder diversion. Urology. 1998; 51: 601-9.
- Rogers E, Scardino PT: A simple ileal substitute bladder after radical
cystectomy: experience with a modification of the Studer pouch. J Urol.
1995; 153: 1432-8.
- Santucci RA, Park CH, Mayo ME, Lange PH: Continence and urodynamic
parameters of continent urinary reservoirs: comparison of gastric, ileal,
ileocolic, right colon and sigmoid segments. Urology. 1999; 54: 252-7.
- Studer EU, Zingg EJ: Ileal orthotopic bladder substitutes: what we
have learned from 12 years’ experience with 200 patients? Urol
Clin North Am. 1997; 24: 781-93.
- Schilling A. Friesen A: Transprostatic selective cystectomy with
an ileal bladder. Eur Urol. 1990; 18: 253-7.
- Gasparini ME, Hinman F Jr, Prest JC Jr, Schimdt RA Carroll PR: Continence
after radical prostatectomy and total bladder replacement: a urodynamic
analysis. J Urol. 1992; 148: 1861-4.
- Vallancien G, Fettouh HAE, Cathelineal X, Baumert H, Fromont G, Guillonneal
B: Cystectomy with prostate sparing for bladder cancer in 100 patients:
10-year experience. J Urol. 2002; 168: 2413-17.
- Colombo R, Bertini R, Salonia A, Da Pozzo LF, Montosi F, Brausi M,
et al.: Nerve and seminal sparing radical cystectomy with orthotopic
urinary diversion for select patients with superficial bladder cancer:
an innovative surgical approach. J Urol. 2001; 165: 51-5.
- Elbadawi A, Matheus R, Light JK, Wheeler TM. Immunohistochemical
and ultrstructural study of rhabdosphincter component of the prostatic
capsule. J Urol. 1997; 158: 1819-28.
- Srougi M, Dall’ Oglio M, Nesrallah LJ, Arruda HO, Ortiz V:
Radical cystectomy with preservation of sexual function and urinary
continence: descriptio of a new technique. Int Braz J Urol. 2003; 29:
336-44.
- Steiner MS, Morton RA , Walsh PC: Impact of radical prostatectomy
on urinary continence. J Urol. 1991; 145: 512-5.
_____________________
Received: June 26, 2003
Accepted after revision: September 30, 2003
_______________________
Correspondence address:
Dr. Homero Oliveira de Arruda
Rua Napoleão de Barros, 715 / 2o.andar
São Paulo, SP, 04024-002, Brazil
Fax: + 55 11 4521-9658
E-mail: arrudas@dglnet.com.br
EDITORIAL
COMMENT
This
really is an interesting paper. It has a real message that, in the 42
men in whom they did an orthotopic ileal neobladder who had not had previous
prostate surgery, 92 percent had daytime continence, while in the 15 patients
who had had previous prostate surgery, this continence rate dropped to
66 percent. Since they were the same surgeons and since the continence
rate for the people not having previous prostate surgery is the same as
reported by other large studies, one has to feel that this difference
is real and is related to the previous surgery.
Dr.
Ralph W. de Vere White
Professor and Chair, Department of Urology
Director, Davis Cancer Center
University of California
Sacramento, California, USA
EDITORIAL
COMMENT
The
manuscript explores several factors that may affect urinary continence
after orthotopic bladder construction. The authors used a strict but reasonable
definition of incontinence; namely the need for greater than one pad a
day. They report a previously unrecognized, or at least unreported, risk
factor for incontinence after orthotopic bladder construction; namely
a history of prior prostatic surgery. Then they proposed several mechanisms
to explain this finding. Certainly this is information easily ascertained
and elicited by a review of medical history, and it also may affect a
number of patients facing cystectomy. However, the increase frequency
of medical therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms will likely reduce
the pool.
Dr.
Paul F. Schellhammer
Professor and Chair, Department of Urology
Eastern Virginia Medical School
Norfolk, Virginia, USA |