|
ENDOUROLOGY
& LAPAROSCOPY
Laparoscopic
radical cystoprostatectomy with bilateral nephroureterectomy: initial
report
Berglund RK, Matin SF, Desai M, Kaouk J, Gill IS
Section of Laparoscopic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Urological Institute,
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
BJU Int. 2006; 97: 37-41
- Objectives:
To present our experience with laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy
and bilateral nephroureterectomy for organ-confined, muscle-invasive
transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder in two patients with
dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease (ESRD).
-
Patients and Methods:
Two men aged 77 and 65 years with organ-confined, muscle-invasive TCC
of the urinary bladder and pre-existing dialysis-dependent ESRD underwent
laparoscopic bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy, radical cystoprostatectomy
and bilateral nephroureterectomy. Urine spillage was avoided and en
bloc urothelial integrity between the bladder and the two renal specimens
was maintained throughout the procedure. The intact, entrapped specimens
were removed en bloc via a Pfannenstiel incision at the end of the procedure.
- Results:
The total operative duration was 573 and 660 min, respectively, including
repositioning and re-draping between each major step. Blood loss was
350 and 1000 mL, respectively. Both patients tolerated the procedure
well and there were no intraoperative complications. The first patient
resumed oral intake 3 days after surgery and was discharged home after
5 days. The second patient’s course after surgery was complicated
by a prolonged adynamic ileus and infection of the catheter placed for
continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. He was discharged 28 days
after surgery and died from unknown causes at 30 days.
-
Conclusions:
To our knowledge, this is the first report of radical urotheliectomy,
consisting of bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection, radical cystoprostatectomy,
and bilateral nephroureterectomy, using entirely intracorporeal laparoscopic
techniques.
- Editorial
Comment
This paper demonstrates a new era of laparoscopic procedures, which
are extremely complicated. The oncological steps were respected and
blood loss diminished for complex combined procedures. Although the
number of patients was small, I believe the authors should be congratulated
for the pioneer work in the area of minimally invasive surgery.
Dr.
Fernando J. Kim
Chief of Urology, DHMC
Assistant Professor, Univ Colorado Health Sci Ctr
Denver, Colorado, USA |