|
ENDOUROLOGY
& LAPAROSCOPY
Laparoscopic
Dismembered Pyeloplasty in Children Younger Than 2 Years
Cascio S, Tien A, Chee W, Tan HL
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Women’s and Children’s Hospital,
and University of Adelaide, North Adelaide, South Australia
J Urol. 2007; 177: 335-8
- Purpose:
Since the first laparoscopic pyeloplasty was described in a child in
1995, there have been several reports of pyeloplasty in older children.
However, to date there have been few reports of laparoscopic pyeloplasty
in infants and toddlers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results
of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children younger than 2 years.
-
Materials and Methods:
All laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasties performed in children
younger than 2 years were retrospectively reviewed. The diagnosis of
ureteropelvic junction obstruction was confirmed on renal sonography
and diuretic renogram. Laparoscopic pyeloplasties were performed via
a transperitoneal route as originally described, with key modifications.
All children were investigated with postoperative diuretic renogram
and renal ultrasonography.
-
Results: A
total of 38 children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction underwent
laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes Pyeloplasty between January 2001 and December
2005. Of these patients 11 (7 males and 4 females) were younger than
2 years at surgery (median 1.4, range 2 to 22 months) and 1 had bilateral
ureteropelvic junction obstruction, for a total of 12 primary repairs.
However, 2 patients (17%) required redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty, for
a total of 14 laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasties in this age group.
Operative time ranged from 70 to 140 minutes (mean 100) and median hospital
stay was 2 days. Followup studies showed normal drainage in all patients
except 1, who after redo pyeloplasty exhibited significantly improved
but still prolonged drainage.
-
Conclusions:
This study suggests that laparoscopic pyeloplasty can now be performed
in young children with good results.
- Editorial
Comment
Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty still remains controversial in the pediatric
population. The new era of reconstructive surgery with better laparoscopic
knowledge and instrumentation, i.e.; fine needlescopic (minilaparoscopic)
instruments, facilitated the ease of executing a precise and delicate
reconstructive surgery, allowing surgeons to perform the anastomosis
without handling or traumatizing the ureter or pelvic mucosa.
In a retrospective study, the authors evaluated their experience of
14 laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasties performed in patients less
than 2 years-old. The data demonstrated feasibility of this surgical
technique with a good outcome measured objectively by nuclear renal
lasix scan but with no subjective evaluation (pain free postoperatively).
Dr.
Fernando J. Kim
Chief of Urology, Denver Health Med Ctr
Assistant Professor, Univ Colorado Health Sci Ctr
Denver, Colorado, USA |