|
RECONSTRUCTIVE
UROLOGY
Robotic-assisted
laparoscopic radical cystectomy and intra-abdominal formation of an orthotopic
ileal neobladder
Beecken WD, Wolfram M, Engl T, Bentas W, Probst M, Blaheta R, Oertl A,
Jonas D, Binder J
Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, J.W. Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai
7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Eur Urol. 2003; 44: 337-9
- Purpose:
To describe our technique of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy
and intra-abdominal formation of an orthotopic neobladder (Hautmann)
for treatment of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.
-
Methods:
We describe our surgical technique in the worldwide first attempt to
perform a robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy and completely
intra-abdominal formation of an orthotopic neobladder. The DaVinci System™
(Intuitive Surgical, Mountain View, CA, USA) was utilized to perform
the procedure.
-
Results: Utilizing
the DaVinci System the operation could be performed without any complications.
Operating time was 8.5 hours, blood loss was 200 ml. The oncologic as
well as the functional result of the reservoir were excellent.
-
Discussion:
We here demonstrated that sophisticated laparoscopic procedures like
the intra-abdominal formation of an orthotopic neobladder are accomplishable
with robotic assistance.
- Editorial
Comment
Over the recent years experience with laparoscopic tumor ablation in
urology has been increasing. In many centers worldwide adrenalectomy,
total or partial nephrectomy and radical prostatectomy are now regularly
performed. Although reports on radical cystectomy do exist, this procedure
has always been thought to be problematic for minimal invasive surgery
due to the necessity of a subsequent reconstructive urinary diversion.
In this paper by Beecken et al., the authors have managed to perform
a laparoscopic radical cystectomy and an orthotopic ileal neobladder
completely intracorporeally. Contrary to other reports the type of urinary
diversion was similar to the urinary diversion used by open surgery.
The difference lies in a different sequence of the procedure mainly
for the neobladder. Although the time to perform such a procedure is
respectable compared to some previous reports, it is still considerably
longer than experienced surgeons would necessitate for an open procedure.
Furthermore an expensive and sophisticated computerized robotic system
available only in a few centers worldwide was used and most probably
accounted for the success. It shows however that laparoscopic radical
cystectomy and an orthotopic ileal neobladder will be improved with
the development of new tools and that we are faced with the fact that
in several years from now centers of excellence may perform also this
procedure less invasive, and probably in a comparable time period. The
increased cost of such equipment will have to be equated with reduced
patients’ hospitalization, morbidity and earlier return to work.
Dr.
Arnulf Stenzl
Professor and Chairman of Urology
Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen
Tuebingen, Germany
|