|
RECONSTRUCTIVE
UROLOGY
Lymphadenectomy with cystectomy: is it necessary and what is its extent?
Ghoneim MA, Abol-Enein H
Urology & Nephrology Center, Gomhouria Street, Mansoura, Dakahlia
35516, Egypt
Eur Urol. 2004; 46: 457-461
- No
Abstract Available
- Editorial
Comment
Several decades ago, well known urologic surgeons in the field
made it clear that lymphadenectomy is an important part of anterior
exenteration. It was, however, thought to be useful only for staging.
More recent reports, however, both from the USA and Europe have shown
that patients with minimal involvement of lymph nodes and curable primary
transitional cell cancer of the bladder may survive even without further
adjuvant treatment. This means that nodal disease defined as N-1 in
the TNM system can be cured surgically, at least in some cases. In one
larger report the authors even found the T-stage to be more important
and the actual prognostic factor for survival regardless whether patients
were staged as N-0 or N-1 [1]. This prompted some authors to propose
an extension of pelvic lymphadenectomy cranially to the common iliac
and the para-aortic region.
The para-aortic and especially the common iliac region were the main
trunk of the sympathetic fibers supplying the hypogastric plexus could
be found. The division of these fibers may lead to functional problems
in the remnant urethra in patients undergoing an orthotopic neobladder
after cystectomy [2]. The present paper by two well-known experienced
surgeons is a well worked-up series of 200 patients undergoing radical
cystectomy and extended lymphadenectomy. Only two surgeons performed
all cystectomies, thereby reducing the possibility of an operator dependent
variation. The nodes from each anatomic region were sent on a separate
template for pathologic evaluation. It was demonstrated that none of
the patients with minimal lymph node disease-and those were the ones
that had a chance of cure-had nodal involvement outside the pelvic region.
They did find extrapelvic nodal disease, but in all cases these pN2
patients. Most of us agree with the authors’ conclusion that these
are not the patients which can be cured surgically.
For reconstructive purposes it is important that we can limit our lymphadenctomy
in certain patients to a level where we do not have to dissect the sympathetic
autonomic nerve supply to the hypogastric plexus and pelvic floor. Thereby
functional results of an orthotopic neobladder and vagina can be improved
without compromising oncological results.
References
1. Vieweg J, Gschwend JE, Herr HW, Fair WR: The impact of primary stage
on survival in patients with lymph node positive bladder cancer. J Urol.
1999; 161: 72-6.
2. Stenzl A, Colleselli K, Bartsch G: Update of urethra-sparing approaches
in cystectomy in women. World J Urol. 1997; 15: 134-8.
Dr.
Arnulf Stenzl
Professor and Chairman of Urology
Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen
Tuebingen, Germany
|