| SALVAGE
RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: AN ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT FOR LOCAL RECURRENCE OF
RADIORESISTANT CANCER
(
Download pdf )
MARCOS F. DALL’OGLIO,
FRANCUALDO BARRETO, MARIO PARANHOS, ADRIANO NESRALLAH, LUCIANO NESRALLAH,
MIGUEL SROUGI
Department
of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo (USP), Sao Paulo,
Brazil
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
The treatment of recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy or brachytherapy
through radical prostatectomy has been little indicated due to the concern
over the procedure’s morbidity. We present the experience of our
service with postradiotherapy radical prostatectomy.
Materials and Methods: Between 1996 and
2002, 9 patients submitted to radiotherapy due to prostate cancer were
treated with salvage surgery for locally recurrent disease. All patients
had a biopsy of the prostate confirming the tumor recurrence, increase
in the PSA levels and staging without evidence of a systemic disease.
We have assessed the morbidity and the recurrence-free survival rate after
salvage radical prostatectomy.
Results: Preradiotherapy PSA varied from
6.2 to 50 ng/mL (mean 17.3) and clinical staging T1, T2 and T3 in 33.3%,
44.4% and 22.2% of the patients respectively. The interval for the biopsy
after conforming external beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy varied from
8 to 108 months (median: 36). Four patients received antiandrogenic therapy
neoadjuvant to the surgery with a mean of 7 months (1-48) after radiotherapy.
From the six patients potent before the surgery, three have presented
erectile dysfunction. Urinary incontinence as well as bladder neck sclerosis
occurred in two patients (22.2%). Biochemical recurrence occurred in two
individuals (22.2%) 12 months after the surgery. Biochemical recurrence-free
survival rate was 77.8% with median follow-up time of 30 months (8-102).
Conclusion: Salvage radical prostatectomy
is a safe and effective alternative for the treatment of locally recurrent
prostate cancer after radiotherapy and brachytherapy.
Key
words: prostatic neoplasms; radiotherapy; recurrence; salvage
therapy; prostatectomy
Int Braz J Urol. 2006; 32: 550-6
INTRODUCTION
The
various forms of treatment for prostate cancer (PCa) include observation,
external-beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, cryotherapy, hormonal therapy
and surgery, however, the decision of the ideal therapy should be individualized
(1,2). Radical prostatectomy (RP) presents a biochemical recurrence rate
of 17 to 33% (3,4), while brachytherapy and external-beam radiotherapy
25 to 40% (5,6). The individuals that present an increase in their PSA
level after radiation therapy and that are possible candidates to salvage
radical prostatectomy (SRP) should be submitted to a new staging of the
disease, since the increase can indicate local recurrence, either systemic
or both (2). Prostatic biopsy is positive in 80 to 100% of the cases (2,7),
being fundamental the confirmation of the tumor for the therapeutic decision.
Salvage procedures such as antiandrogenic therapy, radical prostatectomy
and cryotherapy are options for patients with primary treatment failure.
SRP has been efficient in the control of the disease in a period of time,
with interesting results, reaching 82% disease-free survival rate in five
years (8,9). However, SRP has not been getting more acceptance due to
technical challenges of the procedure and significant morbidity, occurring
urinary incontinence in 23 to 60%, rectal lesion in 15% and ureter lesion
in 5% of the patients operated (8,10), with post-operative bladder neck
sclerosis in up to 30% of the cases (10,11).
We have presented the results of SRP for
radiotherapy recurring PCa treated in our institution.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
Nine
men with mean age of 59 years (50-75), with biopsies confirming locally
recurrent prostate cancer after conforming external beam radiotherapy
(XRT) or brachytherapy (BT) were submitted to SRP between 1996 and 2002.
Patients were considered candidates for salvage surgery when they presented
a biopsy confirming the presence of a tumor, increase in the PSA levels
and absence of systemic disease, confirmed by bone scintigraphy, thorax
radiography, tomography or magnetic resonance of the abdomen or pelvis
with digital prostate examination at the physical exam. From the nine
irradiated individuals, four received BT, four XRT and one was treated
with both. Data regarding perioperative characteristics were assessed
such as operative time, transoperatory bleeding, blood transfusion and
hospital stay. In the postoperative follow-up, the erectile function was
analyzed by the penetration capacity with or without oral medication,
urinary incontinence (> 1 pad/day) and bladder neck sclerosis in all
individuals.
RESULTS
Mean
follow-up was 30 months (8-102). Demographic data of the studied group
are represented on Table-1 with preoperative and pathological Gleason
score on Figure-1. Pathological stage was pT2N0 and pT3N0 in four and
five patients respectively. Time interval after primary therapy (XRT or
BT) for the beginning of antiandrogenic therapy was 1 to 48 months (median:
7 months) performed in four patients and the time to perform the prostate
biopsy had a median of 36 months (8-108) after prostatic irradiation.
SRP occurred normally, as Table-2 shows.
Pathological staging revealed an organ-confined disease in four patients
(44%), extra-prostatic extension occurred in five individuals (56%) and
invasion of the seminal vesicles in three (33%). From the four patients
that had organ-confined disease, three (75%) had biopsy Gleason score
≤ 7. All three patients with compromised seminal vesicle presented
biopsy Gleason score 7 or 8, while 60% of the patients with periprostatic
extension presented a Gleason score 8. Organ-confined disease occurred
in 75% of the patients with pre-radiotherapy PSA ≤ 10 ng/mL, with
the compromise of the seminal vesicles occurred in all patients with PSA
level above 20 ng/mL before radiotherapy.
From the nine analyzed patients, seven (78%)
kept urinary continence, two presented bladder neck sclerosis (22%) two
months after the surgery, and erectile dysfunction occurred in half of
the patients (Table-3). Two individuals presented urinary incontinence
after SRP, being one of them, after internal urethrotomy due to bladder
neck sclerosis. Both were treated with artificial sphincter AMS 800. On
Table-4, those results are compared to other series. After the SRP, biochemical
recurrence occurred in two cases (22%) after a median time of 15 months
requiring the introduction of antiandrogenic hormonal therapy.
Seven patients (78%) had the PSA less than
0.4 ng/mL, without any evidence of the disease, from which five (56%)
without hormonal therapy. One patient with pre-XRT PSA levels of 50 ng/mL,
clinical stage T3c, presented a recurrence in retroperitoneal lymph nodes,
being submitted to cytotoxic chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy in
the areas of compromised lymph nodes. All patients are alive after a median
follow-up time of 30 months (8 to 102 months).
DISCUSSION
In
this series from the nine patients treated with radical prostatectomy
for locally recurrent cancer after primary radiotherapy 78% had disease
control, 22% urinary incontinence and 50% erectile dysfunction. Five patients
(56%) had no adjuvant treatment without evidence of the disease. SRP was
performed without transoperative complications, without the need for blood
transfusion and presenting a cancer specific survival rate of 100% in
the median follow-up time of 8 years (8-102 months).
SRP, even though associated to a larger
control of the prostate cancer locally recurrent after radiotherapy, has
received limited attention in the urologic field due to technical challenges
during surgery and the potential risk of complications such as urinary
incontinence, impotency, bladder neck sclerosis and both rectal and ureteral
lesions (8,9). Urinary incontinence after SRP has been much more frequent
than in conventional radical prostatectomy that varies between 5 and 31%
(12), representing a limiting factor for salvage surgery, since the urinary
incontinence in this study was 22%, similar to other series with a variation
of 16 to 45% (9,10,12). The insertion of the artificial sphincter AMS
800 in the cases of persisting urinary incontinence has offered good results
in most of the cases (13), this resource was used in two cases resolving
urinary leaks.
This study demonstrates an acceptable complication
rate making the results similar to a conventional radical prostatectomy.
Mean operative time was of 168 minutes and bleeding mean of 433 mL, with
mean hospital stay of 4.8 days, similar to other series (9,10). Vaidya
& Soloway reported a mean hospital stay of three days (9). Rectal
lesion did not occur in our initial SRP experience, being in agreement
with the reports of up to 0.6% during conventional radical prostatectomy
(14). By analyzing the SRP series the rectal lesion may occur between
2 to 15% and ureteral lesion 5% of the cases, respectively (8,10).
The risk of bladder neck sclerosis is substantially
high after the SRP (2), the rate of 22% of the study is similar to those
observed by other authors as Table-4 (8,10,11,15) shows. According to
the results obtained in other studies, bladder neck sclerosis after conventional
radical prostatectomy caries between 1 to 4% (16,17), however, Touma et
al. reported an incidence of 17.5% after SRP (12). Bladder neck sclerosis
after radiotherapy can be a problem of difficult solution, sometimes requiring
more complex procedures for an adequate correction such as appendicovesicostomy
or ileovesicostomy as described by Pisters et al. (18).
Erectile dysfunction is considered an inevitable
consequence of the SRP, even though preservation of cavernous nerves is
possible. When it is possible to preserve neurovascular bundles bilaterally,
up to 70% of the patients recuperate their sexual function (10,17) and
urinary continence (10). In this work the erectile function was preserved
in half of the patients previously potent before the surgery.
Clinical stage of post-radiotherapy recurrent
prostate cancer is a predictive factor for disease free survival rate
(2,12,15), even though Rogers et al. (8) have not observed this correlation
(8). In our series, 44% of the cases of the disease were organ-confined
and the involvement of seminal vesicles occurred in 33% of the individuals.
In similar studies those findings occurred in 39% and 30% of the cases,
respectively (15). Preoperative PSA levels inferior to 10 ng/mL have a
strong correlation to organ-confined disease and higher progression-free
survival rate. (2,8,11,12).
Cryotherapy is a viable alternative in the
treatment of radioresistant prostate cancer, however, urinary incontinence
and bladder neck sclerosis rates are 73% and 44% respectively. Besides,
pelvic pain, dysuria, hematuria, bladder neck sclerosis and urethral fistula
are other potential complications of cryotherapy (19). Another discouraging
factor is the reduced control of cancer in relation to SRP (2,12,19).
In this study 55.5% of the individuals were
recurrence-free. SRP is a viable and safe alternative to the treatment
of radioresistant cancer, however the selection of cases with PSA <
15 ng/mL and Gleason score ≤ 7 offer better results without the
need of associated androgenic blockage.
CONFLICT
OF INTEREST
None
declared.
REFERENCES
- Walsh PC: Radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer provides
durable cancer control with excellent quality of life: a structured
debate. J Urol. 2000; 163: 1802-7.
- Pisters LL: Salvage radical prostatectomy: refinement of an effective
procedure. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2003; 13: 166-74.
- Han M, Partin AW, Zahurak M, Piantadosi S, Epstein JI, Walsh PC:
Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following
radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol.
2003; 169: 517-23.
- Ward JF, Blute ML, Slezak J, Bergstralh EJ, Zincke H: The long-term
clinical impact of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer 5 or more
years after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2003; 170: 1872-6.
- Joseph J, Al-Qaisieh B, Ash D, Bottomley D, Carey B: Prostate-specific
antigen relapse-free survival in patients with localized prostate cancer
treated by brachytherapy. BJU Int. 2004; 94: 1235-8.
- Kuban DA, Thames HD, Levy LB, Horwitz EM, Kupelian PA, Martinez AA,
et al.: Long-term multi-institutional analysis of stage T1-T2 prostate
cancer treated with radiotherapy in the PSA era. Int J Radiat Oncol
Biol Phys. 2003; 57: 915-28.
- Levi AW, Epstein JI: Pseudohyperplastic prostatic adenocarcinoma on
needle biopsy and simple prostatectomy. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000; 24:
1039-46.
- Rogers E, Ohori M, Kassabian VS, Wheeler TM, Scardino PT: Salvage
radical prostatectomy: outcome measured by serum prostate specific antigen
levels. J Urol. 1995; 153: 104-10.
- Vaidya A, Soloway MS: Salvage radical prostatectomy for radiorecurrent
prostate cancer: morbidity revisited. J Urol. 2000; 164: 1998-2001.
- Stephenson AJ, Scardino PT, Bianco FJ Jr, DiBlasio CJ, Fearn PA,
Eastham JA: Morbidity and functional outcomes of salvage radical prostatectomy
for locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy. J Urol.
2004; 172: 2239-43.
- Amling CL, Lerner SE, Martin SK, Slezak JM, Blute ML, Zincke H: Deoxyribonucleic
acid ploidy and serum prostate specific antigen predict outcome following
salvage prostatectomy for radiation refractory prostate cancer. J Urol.
1999; 161: 857-62; discussion 862-3.
- Touma NJ, Izawa JI, Chin JL: Current status of local salvage therapies
following radiation failure for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2005; 173:
373-9.
- Elliott DS, Boone TB: Combined stent and artificial urinary sphincter
for management of severe recurrent bladder neck contracture and stress
incontinence after prostatectomy: a long-term evaluation. J Urol. 2001;
165: 413-5.
- Dillioglugil O, Leibman BD, Leibman NS, Kattan MW, Rosas AL, Scardino
PT: Risk factors for complications and morbidity after radical retropubic
prostatectomy. J Urol. 1997; 157: 1760-7.
- Gheiler EL, Tefilli MV, Tiguert R, Grignon D, Cher ML, Sakr W, et
al.: Predictors for maximal outcome in patients undergoing salvage surgery
for radio-recurrent prostate cancer. Urology. 1998; 51: 789-95.
- Lepor H, Nieder AM, Ferrandino MN: Intraoperative and postoperative
complications of radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series
of 1,000 cases. J Urol. 2001; 166: 1729-33.
- Catalona WJ, Carvalhal GF, Mager DE, Smith DS: Potency, continence
and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies.
J Urol. 1999; 162: 433-8.
- Pisters LL, English SF, Scott SM, Westney OL, Dinney CP, McGuire
EJ: Salvage prostatectomy with continent catheterizable urinary reconstruction:
a novel approach to recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy.
J Urol. 2000; 163: 1771-4.
- Pisters LL, von Eschenbach AC, Scott SM, Swanson DA, Dinney CP, Pettaway
CA, et al.: The efficacy and complications of salvage cryotherapy of
the prostate. J Urol. 1997; 157: 921-5.
____________________
Accepted after revision:
March 7, 2006
_______________________
Correspondence address:
Dr. Marcos F. Dall’Oglio
Rua Barata Ribeiro, 398 / 5o. Andar
São Paulo, SP, 01308-000, Brazil
Fax: + 55 11 3159-0994
E-mail: marcosdallogliouro@terra.com.br
EDITORIAL COMMENT
The
authors report on excellent results with post-radiotherapy salvage radical
prostatectomy in nine patients. Some considerations can be done, regarding
the results obtained herein.
First,
one remarkable aspect of the study is the young age range of the patients
submitted to salvage radical prostatectomies in this series. Of the nine
men, five were under 60 years of age at the time of salvage surgery. Considering
that the median time from initial treatment to the establishment of therapeutic
failure was 36 months, we can conclude that most patients were really
young when receiving the initial radiation treatment. May be that the
best window for cure was lost then for these men.
A
second intriguing finding is the very low complication rate associated
to salvage surgery in the published series, which is considerably lower
than that of historical series of greater patient volumes. Urinary incontinence,
which approaches 60% in historic series, was observed in only 22% in this
study. Rectal injuries, also reported in larger series (around 10% at
Wayne State), (1) were absent here. Besides, the authors reported excellent
potency rates, something unexpected in this kind of surgery. This may
indicate one of two things: either a low generation of fibrosis by the
radiation treatments received or an exceptional surgical technique. This
is also confirmed by the lack of transfusions and by the reduced operative
time (mean 168 minutes).
Recent
data suggest that salvage radical prostatectomy may be a very good option
to patients with biochemical failure after initial radiation treatment.
This year, the group from Mayo Clinic reported on the results of 138 patients
submitted salvage radical prostatectomy, with 65% cancer-specific survival
rates (2). Approximately 70% of patients remained continent or in need
of one pad/day; transfusion rates were 36%, rectal injuries occurred in
4%, and bladder neck sclerosis in 22%. The conclusions of the authors
were that results improved with time, and that salvage surgery should
be offered to Young men with at least 10-year life expectancy and organ-confined
disease.
In
a setting in which the media easily distorts scientific truth, we have
observed growing numbers of non-surgical options for the initial treatment
of younger men with clinically localized prostate cancer. In this situation,
the favorable results of salvage surgery are welcome. However, we do not
know yet whether the results of this Brazilian study (with small numbers,
in fact) or the results of the Mayo Clinic are really reproducible by
all our urologic surgeons. Probably, our best strategy concerning this
subject would be to inform our urologists that, as we see in muscle-invasive
bladder cancer, surgery is still the best initial chance of cure for young
men with biologically aggressive prostate cancer.
REFERENCES
1. Pontes JE, Montie
J, Klein E, Huben R: Salvage surgery for radiation failure in prostate
cancer. Cancer. 1993; 71: 976-80.
2. Ward JF, Sebo TJ, Blute ML, Zincke H: Salvage surgery for radiorecurrent
prostate cancer: contemporary outcomes. J Urol. 2005; 173: 1156-60.
Dr. Gustavo
Franco Carvalhal
Section of Urology, Catholic University
Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
E-mail: gcarvalhal@terra.com.br
|