| INTRACAVAL
AND INTRACARDIAC EXTENSION OF WILMS’ TUMOR. THE INFLUENCE OF PREOPERATIVE
CHEMOTHERAPY ON SURGICAL MORBIDITY
(
Download pdf )
LILIAN M. CRISTOFANI,
RICARDO J. DUARTE, MARIA T. ALMEIDA, VICENTE ODONE FILHO, JOAO G. MAKSOUD,
MIGUEL SROUGI
Pediatric
Oncology (LMC, MTA, VOF), Pediatric Surgery (JGM) and Urology (RJD, MS),
University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
The aim of this retrospective study is to compare surgical complications
and long-term survival in children with Wilms’ tumor (WT) and tumor
thrombus receiving or not preoperative chemotherapy.
Materials and Methods: Review of the charts
of 155 children with WT treated between 1983 and 2005, and analysis of
16/155 (10.3%) children with WT who presented cavoatrial tumor extension,
being 8/16 IVC and 8/16 atrial thrombus.
Results: Median age was 54 months. 2/16
had cardiac failure as the first symptom. 11/16(7 IVC and 4 atrial extension)
(67%) were submitted to preoperative chemotherapy with vincristine plus
actinomycin D, and 5/16(1 IVC and 4 atrial) (33%) underwent initial nephrectomy
and thrombus resection. So, 11 patients were submitted to preoperative
VCR/ACTD and 2/11 (18.1%) had complete regression of the thrombus, 6/11(54.5%)
partial regression and 3/11 (27%) had no response. Among the partial responders,
nephrectomy with thrombus removal was performed in all, including one
patient with previous intracardiac involvement, without extracorporeal
circulation procedures. In two of the three non-responders, cardiopulmonary
bypass was necessary for thrombus removal. There were no surgical related
deaths. Long-term survival is 91% in the group submitted to preoperative
chemotherapy and 100% in the group who had surgery as first approach.
Conclusion: Preoperative chemotherapy was
able to reduce thrombus extension in 8/11 (73%) treated patients and cardiopulmonary
bypass was avoided in 2 patients with atrial thrombus. Surgical resection
of tumor and thrombus was successful in all cases, receiving or not preoperative
chemotherapy and overall survival was similar in both groups.
Key
words: Wilms tumors; thrombus; vena cava; cardiac; chemotherapy;
surgery
Int Braz J Urol. 2007; 33: 683-9
INTRODUCTION
Inferior
vena cava (IVC) involvement by Wilms’ tumor occurs in 4-10% of patients
and right atrium thrombus extension in less than 1% (1). This complication
does not influence on the prognosis of the malignancy, but it makes surgical
procedures more challenging, mostly when there is intracardiac involvement.
Surgery used to be the first recommended approach, but some authors report
the effectiveness of preoperative chemotherapy in reducing or eradicating
the thrombus, and also reducing the tumor dimensions and making surgery
easier to perform (2).
The aim of this retrospective study is to
compare surgical morbidity and outcome of patients with Wilms’ tumor
and cavoatrial thrombus who received or not preoperative chemotherapy.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
A
retrospective review of the charts of 155 children with Wilms’ tumor
admitted to the University of Sao Paulo from June/1983 through April/2005
was performed in order to select those with intracaval (IVC) or intracardiac
thrombus. Among them, 16/155 (10.3%) children presented intravascular
thrombus, being the last one diagnosed in April/2001. The patients were
treated with an institutional protocol from 1983-2001. These 16 patients
were analyzed for the use or not of preoperative chemotherapy, effect
of preoperative chemotherapy regarding thrombus extension, surgical morbidity,
intraoperatory time, use of cardiopulmonary bypass, postoperative complications,
number of hospitalization days, transfusion amount and influence on disease
outcome. Fisher’s test, Mann-Whitney and Kaplan-Meyer curve were
employed for statistical analysis.
RESULTS
Sixteen
patients were selected. Eight had IVC (5.15%) and eight (5.15%) had atrial
tumor involvement. There were nine females and seven males. Median age
was 54 months, ranging from one year through 8 years. In 13 patients,
the tumor arose from the right kidney and in 3 from the left. Hematuria
was presented by 4/16 patients, hypertension by 2/16 and 2/16 had cardiac
failure as first symptom. All thrombus were preoperatively detected by
ultrasonography in 13/16 patients, Doppler echography in 5/16, abdominal
CT in 3/16 (Figure-1) and IVU in 3/16.
Median tumor dimension at diagnosis was
120 X 80 mm. Stage II disease was observed in six patients, stage III
in seven and stage IV in three. Histology was favorable in 13 patients
and unfavorable in three.
Among the 8 patients with tumor extension
into the IVC, in 5/8 the thrombus was infrahepatic and in 3/8 there was
a suprahepatic involvement. Preoperative chemotherapy with vincristine
1.5 mg/m2/ day and 21 plus actinomycinD 1.5 mg/m2/
day for four to six weeks was administered to 7/8 of these patients with
IVC involvement and in 1/8 IVC thrombus, a primary surgical resection
was carried out.
In the group of 8 patients with intracardiac
thrombus extension, 4/8 were submitted to the same preoperative chemotherapy
schedule and 4/8 went to surgery after diagnosis because of poor clinical
situation (2 cardiac failure) or surgeon’s preference (2 cases of
the early 80’s).
A total of 11/16 patients were submitted
to preoperative VCR/ACTD for four to six weeks and 2/11 (18.1%) had complete
regression of the thrombus, 6/11(54.5%) partial regression and 3/11 (27.2%)
had no response (Figure-2). There was no correlation between the duration
of preoperative chemotherapy and response. Among the partial responders,
nephrectomy with thrombus removal was performed without cardiopulmonary
bypass in all, including one patient with previous intracardiac involvement,
obviating the use of cardiopulmonary bypass. In two of the three non-responders
cardiopulmonary bypass was necessary for thrombus removal (Table-1). Hypothermia
was used in four patients with atrial thrombus. Radiotherapy was not used
in any patient previously to surgery.
Transfusion mean amount was 803 mL (±
678 mL) in the preoperative chemotherapy group and 1536 mL (± 1001
mL) in the other group, statistically not different values ( p = 0.2159).
Cardiopulmonary bypass was more frequently used in the non-preoperative
chemotherapy group (p = 0.036). Comparing patients not submitted to CBP
with patients submitted to CBP, we have observed that the first group
had lesser transfusion amount (p < 0.001), shorter operative time (p
= 0.001) and shorter hospital stay (p = 0.001).
Mean operative time was 227.7 minutes (±89.2
min.) in the preoperative chemotherapy group and 369 minutes (±110
min.) in the other one, revealing a quite longer time for the non- preoperative
chemotherapy group (p = 0.0263). Mean hospital stay was 5.72 days (±
7.1 days) in the preoperative chemotherapy group and 9 days (±
4.9 days) in the other one, a significant difference (p = 0.0342).
Postoperative infectious complications were
observed in two patients, one with and one without preoperative chemotherapy,
resulting in a longer hospitalization period. No other complications were
presented.
The histopathological analysis of the removed
thrombus revealed viable tumor in 6/11 (54.5%) patients submitted to preoperative
chemotherapy, all of them being favorable histology tumors.
Long-term survival was 91% in the previously
treated group (one child with a chemotherapy resistant anaplastic tumor
had a local relapse and died), and 100% in the group not submitted to
preoperative chemotherapy. There was no difference between both groups
regarding survival rate (p = 0.50), Figure-3. The median follow-up is
177.3 months for the whole group.
COMMENTS
The
incidence of intravascular thrombus extension in our study population
was 10.3%, similar to other authors’ findings, but intracardiac
involvement was 5.5%, a little higher than the reported experience (3,4).
The thrombus occurrence represents a remarkable difficult factor for surgical
procedures, increasing morbidity. In the NWTSG-4 intravascular tumor extension
presented an increased risk for complications (odds ratio 3.8, 95% confidence
interval) (5). It should be an elective procedure, performed by a multidisciplinary
team. Tumor thrombus extending into the suprahepatic IVC (type III) and
right atrium (type IV) requires cardiopulmonary bypass, with or without
circulatory arrest, for removal (6). Cardiopulmonary bypass includes the
use of median sternotomy, atriotomy and systemic anticoagulation (7).
It elongates intraoperatory time, exposing the patient to hypothermia,
blood transfusion, cardiac arrest, pericardic-patch and to the complications
related to these methods (8). Preoperative chemotherapy is recommended
by many authors because it is able to promote significant tumor and thrombus
shrinkage, and may facilitate the surgical approach and tumor resection,
avoiding tumor rupture and neoplastic cells spillage (9), but in some
cases, mostly in patients with cardiac thrombus, the risks of immediate
cardiorespiratory dysfunction due to thromboembolism makes surgery the
first recommended approach (10).
In our retrospective analysis, preoperative
chemotherapy with vcr / actd has induced thrombus shrinkage in 8/11(72.7%)
treated patients, but in 3/11(27.3%) it was ineffective regarding thrombus
extension. Shamberger et al. reported a 79.5% incidence of tumor regression
in similar cases (11). Tumor or thrombus progression or toxicity during
preoperative chemotherapy is a concern for some authors, but it has not
occurred in our patients (12,13).
The 7/8 patients with intracaval thrombus
that were submitted to preoperative chemotherapy presented 1/7(14.3%)
complete regression of the thrombus, 1/7(14.3%) failure and 5/7(71.4%)
partial response. As CBP is the reason for a longer operative time (p
< 0.001), higher transfusion amount (p < 0.001) and longer hospital
stay (p < 0.001), avoiding CBP is the objective of the use of preoperative
chemotherapy. Cardiopulmonary bypass was not necessary for thrombus removal
in all cases of IVC thrombus and in 2/4 patients with intracardiac thrombus,
who were supposed to be submitted to invasive surgical procedures with
CBP, and after receiving preoperative chemotherapy presented a partial
or total thrombus decrease. The remaining 2/4 presented no change in thrombus
extension and surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass was performed with success.
The other 4/8 children with intracardiac thrombus were treated exclusively
with surgery, two due to critical clinical situation at diagnosis (cardiac
failure) demanding prompt intervention and the two others due to surgeons’
own decision. These cases were treated at the early 80’s and a more
aggressive initial approach was recommended at our hospital. All were
successful procedures, with no intra or postoperative deaths.
The mean transfusion amount was similar
in both groups (p = 0.2159), but the group submitted to preoperative chemotherapy
had advantages such as shorter operative time (p = 0.0263) and shorter
hospital stay (p = 0.0342).
Complications like infection, tumor progression,
tumor rupture, thromboembolism, hemorrhage and death are a major concern
in this situation. The NWTS-4 reports a complication incidence rate of
26% for children with initial surgical resection and 13.2% for those with
preoperative chemotherapy (p = 0.053) (11). The complications incidence
rate in NWTS-3 is 43% (14, 15). The SIOP/GPOH group reports 18.18% of
complications in 33 children with Wilms’ tumor and thrombus extension,
29/33 submitted to preoperative chemotherapy (16). The UKW3 trial reports
13.6% of hemorrhagic complications, including 3 deaths (17). In our study,
7/16 (44%) patients required blood transfusions due to the surgical procedures,
and 2/16(12.5%) patients had infectious complications after surgery, one
patient with and one without preoperative treatment. No intraoperative
or postoperative deaths were observed.
This is a twenty-three-year experience and
along this long period of time some changes in medical approach of this
situation have occurred in our institution, including the patterns for
indication of initial surgery, the indication and the drugs used for preoperative
chemotherapy and the postoperative management. Some authors recommend
preoperative chemotherapy for those patients whose tumors are at or above
the supra-hepatic vena cava (COG/NWTS), but many years ago, a surgical
first approach was considered by some surgeons in our institution.
The five-year overall survival was 100%
in the not treated group and 91% in the other, with one death due to local
relapse in a patient with anaplastic tumor submitted to preoperative chemotherapy
with partial response.
CONCLUSION
In
conclusion, preoperative chemotherapy was able to reduce thrombus extension
in 8/11 patients and cardiopulmonary bypass was avoidable in at least
two patients. Although surgical procedures were successful in all cases,
receiving or not preoperative chemotherapy, the first group had some significant
advantages such as shorter operative time and shorter hospital stay, suggesting
the benefits of the preoperative use of vcr/actd in patients with Wilms’
tumor and intravascular thrombus extension.
CONFLICT
OF INTEREST
None
declared.
REFERENCES
- Oberholzer HF, Falkson G, De Jager LC: Successful management of inferior
vena cava and right atrial nephroblastoma tumor thrombus with preoperative
chemotherapy. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1992; 20: 61-3.
- Mushtaq I, Carachi R, Roy G, Azmy A: Childhood renal tumours with
intravascular extension. Br J Urol. 1996;78: 772-6.
- Schettini ST, da Fonseca JH, Abib SC, Telles CA, Haber MX, Rizzo MF,
et al.: Management of Wilms’ tumor with intracardiac extension.
Pediatr Surg Int. 2000; 16: 529-32.
- Ribeiro RC, Schettini ST, Abib Sde C, da Fonseca JH, Cypriano M,
da Silva NS: Cavectomy for the treatment of Wilms tumor with vascular
extension. J Urol. 2006; 176: 279-83; discussion 283-4.
- Ritchey ML, Shamberger RC, Haase G, Horwitz J, Bergemann T, Breslow
NE: Surgical complications after primary nephrectomy for Wilms’
tumor: report from the National Wilms’ Tumor Study Group. J Am
Coll Surg. 2001; 192: 63-8; quiz 146.
- Chiappini B, Savini C, Marinelli G, Suarez SM, Di Eusanio M, Fiorani
V, et al.: Cavoatrial tumor thrombus: single-stage surgical approach
with profound hypothermia and circulatory arrest, including a review
of the literature. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002; 124: 684-8.
- De Lorimier A: Surgical treatment of Wilms’ tumor. In: Pochedy
CL, Muller D (ed). Wilms’ Tumor. Wiley, New York. 1976; pp 167-88.
- Lodge AJ, Jaggers J, Adams D, Rice HE: Vascular control for resection
of suprahepatic intracaval Wilms’ tumor: technical considerations.
J Pediatr Surg. 2000; 35: 1836-7.
- Graf N, Tournade MF, de Kraker J: The role of preoperative chemotherapy
in the management of Wilms’ tumor. The SIOP studies. International
Society of Pediatric Oncology. Urol Clin North Am. 2000; 27: 443-54.
- Giannoulia-Karadana A, Moschovi M, Koutsovitis P, Tolis G, Tzortzatou-Stathopoulou
F: Inferior vena cava and right atrial thrombosis in children with nephroblastoma:
diagnostic and therapeutic problems. J Pediatr Surg. 2000; 35: 1459-61.
- Shamberger RC, Ritchey ML, Haase GM, Bergemann TL, Loechelt-Yoshioka
T, Breslow NE, et al.: Intravascular extension of Wilms tumor. Ann Surg.
2001; 234: 116-21.
- Ritchey ML, Kelalis PP, Haase GM, Shochat SJ, Green DM, D’Angio
G: Preoperative therapy for intracaval and atrial extension of Wilms
tumor. Cancer. 1993; 71: 4104-10.
- Matloub YH, Le Gras MD, Rosenberg HC, Rashid Dar A, Girvan D, Menkis
AH, et al.: Massive intra-atrial Wilms’ tumor: a treatment dilemma.
Med Pediatr Oncol. 1997; 28: 149-53.
- Nakayama DK, Norkool P, deLorimier AA, O’Neill JA Jr, D’Angio
GJ: Intracardiac extension of Wilms’ tumor. A report of the National
Wilms’ Tumor Study. Ann Surg. 1986; 204: 693-7.
- Ritchey ML, Kelalis PP, Breslow N, Etzioni R, Evans I, Haase GM,
et al.: Surgical complications after nephrectomy for Wilms’ tumor.
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992; 175: 507-14.
- Szavay P, Luithle T, Semler O, Graf N, Fuchs J: Surgery of cavoatrial
tumor thrombus in nephroblastoma: a report of the SIOP/GPOH study. Pediatr
Blood Cancer. 2004; 43: 40-5.
- Lall A, Pritchard-Jones K, Walker J, Hutton C, Stevens S, Azmy A,
et al.: Wilms’ tumor with intracaval thrombus in the UK Children’s
Cancer Study Group UKW3 trial. J Pediatr Surg. 2006; 41: 382-7.
____________________
Accepted after revision:
April 24, 2007
_______________________
Correspondence address:
Dr. Lilian M. Cristofani
Rua Galeno de Almeida 148
São Paulo, SP, 05410-030, Brazil
Fax: + 55 11 3897-3803
E-mail: liliancristofani@uol.com.br
EDITORIAL COMMENT
Vascular
extension in patients with Wilms’ tumor occurs in 5 - 10%. This
situation consists in a surgical challenge. Preoperative chemotherapy
seems to benefit those patients, although there are few references about
tumor vascular extension in literature (1,2). Both NWTS and SIOP protocols
recommend that preoperative chemotherapy should be done. The presented
paper shows that preoperative chemotherapy does not change the survival
probability and have some advantages when compared to the non preoperative
chemotherapy group, such as shorter operative times, blood loss and days
of hospitalization. It also prevented some patients from cardiopulmonary
bypass. However, the authors did not make any relation between blood loss
and the type of procedure performed. They reported that 11 patients received
preoperative chemotherapy. Four of those had extension until the right
atrium, but only two needed cardiac bypass. The group of patients without
preoperative chemotherapy (n = 5), four had extension until the right
atrium and all of them were operated with cardiac bypass, which lead to
a greater blood loss (bias). Therefore, this paper shows one institution’s
experience in a rare situation and confirms the results of literature.
REFERENCES
1. Akyüz
CA, Emir S, Büyükpamukçu N, Atahan L, Çaglar M,
Kutluk T, et al.: Cavoatrial tumor extension in children with Wilms tumor:
a retospective review of 17 children in a single center. J Pediatr Hematol
Oncol. 2005; 27: 267-9.
2. Lall A, Pritchard-Jones K, Walker J, Hutton C, Stevens S, Azmy A, et
al.: Wilms’ tumor with intracaval thrombus in the UK Children’s
Cancer Study Group UKW3 trial. J Pediatr Surg. 2006; 41: 382-7.
Dr.
Rodrigo Chaves Ribeiro
Pediatric Oncology Institute
Federal University of São Paulo
São Paulo, SP, Brazil
E-mail: rodrigocribeiro@uol.com.br
|