| EFFICACY 
        OF TRANSCUTANEOUS FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION ON URINARY INCONTINENCE 
        IN MYELOMENINGOCELE: RESULTS OF A PILOT STUDY( 
        Download pdf )
 Neurourology 
         doi: 10.1590/S1677-55382010000500012 
         ABDOL-MOHAMMAD KAJBAFZADEH, LIDA SHARIFI-RAD, 
        SEYEDSAEID DIANAT Pediatric 
        Urology Research Center, Department of Pediatric Urology (AMK, SSD) and 
        Department of Physical Therapy (LSR), Children’s Hospital, Tehran 
        University of Medical Sciences, Islamic Republic of Iran ABSTRACT      Purpose: 
        To investigate the efficacy of transcutaneous functional electrical stimulation 
        (FES) on voiding symptoms in children with myelomeningocele (MMC) suffering 
        from neuropathic urinary incontinence.Materials and Methods: Six girls and 6 boys 
        with moderate to severe urinary incontinence secondary to MMC were included. 
        Median age of children was 5.04 (range: 3-11) years. They underwent a 
        urodynamic study (UDS) before and 3 months after FES with special attention 
        to detrusor leak point pressure (DLPP) and maximal bladder capacity (MBC). 
        Daily incontinence score, frequency of pad changing, and enuresis were 
        also assessed before and three months after treatment. Fifteen courses 
        of FES for 15 minutes 3 times per week were performed with low frequency 
        (40 Hz) electrical current, duration of 250µs, with hold and rest 
        time of 2 seconds.
 Results: Nine children had improvement on 
        urinary incontinence score, while three children had no improvement. Median 
        DLPP was significantly increased from 38.5 (range: 12-50) cm H2O to 59.5 
        (range: 18-83) cm H2O (P = 0.003). MBC was significantly increased from 
        median value of 155 (range: 60-250) mL to 200 (range: 110-300) mL (P = 
        0.007).
 Conclusions: This is a pilot study showing 
        that FES therapy might have positive effects on improvement of voiding 
        symptoms of MMC children with neurogenic urinary incontinence in terms 
        of daily incontinence score and UDS parameters.
 Key 
        words: myelomeningocele; functional electrical stimulation; urinary 
        incontinenceInt Braz J Urol. 2010; 36: 614-20
   INTRODUCTION       Myelomeningocele 
        (MMC) is the most common cause of neurogenic bladder in children. Bladder 
        function in these children is affected by disordered innervation of detrusor 
        muscle and external urethral sphincter that may lead to hydronephrosis 
        or reflux and finally renal failure with life-threatening consequences 
        (1). Treatment of urinary system dysfunction is primarily aimed at preventing 
        upper urinary tract damage and secondarily at gaining continence and improving 
        quality of life and social interactions (2). Initial treatment is based 
        on clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) and anticholinergic medications. 
        In those who fail to respond to medical treatment, surgical procedures 
        might be needed (3).Electrical stimulation has been used for 
        the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults for several decades and 
        recently in children (4,5).
 Most authors believe that nonimplanted electrical stimulation induces 
        action potential in the afferent fibers of pudendal nerve leading to efferent 
        outflow causing contraction of the striated pelvic floor musculature. 
        In addition, inappropriate detrusor activity might be inhibited by this 
        modality (6).
 Functional electrical stimulation (FES) 
        is the application of electrical current to the excitable tissue to improve 
        function that is lost in neurologically impaired individuals. It is a 
        useful noninvasive therapeutic option that is used as a conservative treatment 
        with positive results in bladder overactivity (7).
 Many patients with urge, stress and mixed 
        urinary incontinence have been treated with FES using anal or vaginal 
        electrodes which resulted in inhibitory reflexes against spontaneous detrusor 
        contraction (8).
 To our knowledge, there has been no reported 
        study evaluating the effects of transcutaneous functional electrical stimulation 
        on urinary incontinence and urodynamic study (UDS) parameters in MMC children. 
        This therapeutic option was used in form of a pilot study to improve urinary 
        incontinence symptoms in MMC patients.
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
       Between 
        August 2007 and March 2009, 12 children (6 boys and 6 girls) with neuropathic 
        urinary incontinence secondary to MMC who were referred to our clinic 
        at Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical 
        Sciences, were enrolled in the present study. This study was approved 
        by the local Ethics Committee and written informed consent was obtained 
        from all children’s caregivers. Inclusion criteria were defined 
        as children with MMC, aged more than 3 years and moderate to severe urinary 
        incontinence with unsatisfactory response to conventional treatment (requiring 
        CIC every 3 to 4 hours and use of pads). Urological evaluation consisted 
        of renal ultrasonography, urinalysis and UDS. Urodynamic parameters including 
        mean bladder capacity (MBC) and detrusor leak point pressure (DLPP), were 
        recorded according to recommendations by International Children’s 
        Continence Society (ICCS) (9).Daily incontinence score, the episodes of 
        nighttime wetting (the number of nights that the child involuntarily micturates 
        during sleep in a one-week period) and frequency of pad changing (the 
        number of leakage episodes between two consecutive CICs) were recorded 
        in a voiding diary by parents. The daily incontinence score was recorded 
        on a 0-3 scale, as described by Schurch et al. score 0, completely dry; 
        1, wet once a day, usually at night (mild); 2, wet for < 50% of the 
        time between CIC (moderate); and 3, wet for > 50% of the time between 
        CIC (severe) (10). A decrement of 2 or more degrees in the daytime incontinence 
        score was considered as “improvement”.
 UDS (F.M. Wiest Medizintechnik GmbH, Unterhaching, 
        Germany) was performed according to recommendations by the ICCS in all 
        patients in a supine position (9). The intravesical and abdominal pressures 
        were measured simultaneously with a double lumen catheter and with a rectal 
        balloon catheter. EMG was recorded with superficial electrodes in the 
        perineal area. Special attention was given to detrusor leak point pressure 
        (DLPP) and maximal bladder capacity. The same protocol was used for the 
        UDS performed three months after FES courses. Anticholinergic medications 
        were discontinued at least seven days prior to both UDS sessions. Subjective 
        success was assessed by voiding diary and was compared to objective measurements 
        of UDS.
 Following the pretreatment UDS, conventional 
        treatment (anticholinergic and CIC) was continued and children received 
        15 courses of transcutaneous FES for 15 minutes in each session, 3 times 
        per week.
 The same electrical stimulation device (model 755X, one-channel NOVIN, 
        Isfahan, Iran) was used for all the patients. Stimulation was delivered 
        with an adjustable power setting. Two rectangular self-adhesive (2.5 × 
        2.5 cm) electrodes were used. Positive electrode was placed on the skin 
        above the pubic symphysis, and the negative one was placed on the skin 
        under urethra.
 In all treatment sessions, we used 40 Hz 
        frequency (to cover both the irritative and obstructive symptoms and stimulate 
        striated muscle fibers and urethral sphincter in pelvic floor), duration 
        of 250µs with hold and rest time of 2 seconds. The intensity was 
        increased until the child experienced a strong but comfortable level of 
        muscle contractions. Maximum current intensity was below the pain threshold 
        and well tolerated by the children. In younger children, an intensity 
        setting of < 30 mA was used. Median current intensity in others was 
        40 (range: 20-65) mA.
 Children were followed for more than 3 months. 
        All patients underwent UDS three months after the 15 courses of FES.
 Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 
        16.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). The Wilcoxon-Signed rank test 
        was executed for non parametric statistical comparisons before and after 
        treatment. P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
 RESULTS
       Twelve 
        MMC children including six girls and six boys were enrolled in the present 
        study. Median age of the patients was 5.04 (range: 3-11 years). Demographic 
        data of children are described in Table-1. 
 Two of twelve patients became completely 
        dry between two consecutive CICs. Daily incontinence score was improved 
        from 3 to 1 in five children. Three children remained unchanged for their 
        daily incontinence score. Of those three children who failed to respond 
        to electrical stimulation, two were totally incontinent (Daily incontinence 
        score: 3) initially before the treatment.
 Details of voiding characteristics and UDS 
        parameters before and after FES therapy are summarized in Table-2. Overall, 
        median daily incontinence score was improved from 3 (range: 2-3) to 1 
        (range: 0-3) (P = 0.006). Median frequency of pad changing was significantly 
        decreased from 6 (range: 2-8) to 2 (range: 0-7) times/day (P = 0.004). 
        Median episodes of night wetting was 3 (range: 2-7) night/week before 
        the electrical stimulation, which improved to 2 (range: 1-7) night/week 
        after the treatment (P = 0.06).
 
 Both of two UDS parameters were significantly 
        improved after treatment. Median DLPP was significantly increased from 
        38.5 (range: 12-50) cm H2O to 59.5 (range: 18-83)cm H2O (P = 0.003). MBC 
        was significantly increased from median value of 155 (range: 60-250) mL 
        to 200 (range: 110-300) mL (P = 0.007). No significant adverse effect 
        was reported by the children and their parents after treatment.
 COMMENTS
       Myelomeningocele 
        repair is still challenging in the literature. Unfavorable effects of 
        prenatal intervention on postnatal bladder function include poor compliance, 
        poor detrusor contractility, detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia, hydronephrosis 
        and vesicoureteral reflux. This may highlight the existence of bladder 
        developmental defects in these children (11).In patients with MMC, hyperactivity or inactivity 
        of either detrusor or external urethral sphincter leads to bladder-sphincter 
        dysfunction and ultimately urinary incontinence and poor quality of life. 
        In most of the children, urinary continence can be gained with bladder 
        emptying by CIC and anticholinergic medication.
 Continent catheterizable urinary diversion 
        is applied in patients who do not respond to anticholinergic medications. 
        However, it may be complicated by urinary tract infection, distal dehiscence 
        of conduit, stomal stenosis, and urinary stomal leakage (12).
 Mini-invasive collagen sling has also been 
        used as a safe and easy method with promising immediate results in patients 
        with neurogenic urinary incontinence. However, a one-year follow-up study 
        failed to demonstrate beneficial long term outcome (13).
 Electrical stimulation, as a clinical non-invasive 
        treatment option to manage the urinary incontinence symptoms, was first 
        introduced by Caldwell and colleagues (14).
 Numerous electrical stimulation methods 
        have been reported to be effective for the treatment of lower urinary 
        tract dysfunction (15).
 There are many evidences that electrical 
        stimulation can lead to activation of detrusor inhibitory reflex as well 
        as striated urethral muscles contraction (4). This kind of treatment can 
        cause hypertrophy of muscle fibers, possibly by the recruitment of motor 
        units with faster conduction and alter the expression of myosin isoforms, 
        favoring a conversion to type l muscle fibers (4). An effect of FES at 
        the peripheral level can be modulation of neurotransmitters such as cholinergic 
        and ß-adrenergic system (16). In a study by Ishigooka et al., reduction 
        in norepinephrine content of the rabbit urinary bladder by a combination 
        of yohimbine and electrical stimulation of pelvic floor musculature has 
        been reported. These authors have suggested the reflexive activation of 
        hypogastric nerves following pelvic floor stimulation (17). This finding 
        can describe the effect of FES therapy in patients with bladder overactivity.
 Therapeutic effects of FES may be achieved 
        through normalization and balance between cholinergic and beta-adrenergic 
        neurotransmitters (8). The prolonged intravaginal FES restores the normal 
        reflex pattern of detrusor function through reorganization of the neural 
        system innervating the bladder (18).
 Results of our present pilot study revealed 
        that transcutaneous FES of striated urethral sphincter decreased daily 
        incontinence score, number of enuresis, and frequency of pad changing 
        in 75% of MMC patients. In addition, significant improvement obtained 
        in the UDS parameters (DLPP, MBC) three months after the treatment. We 
        used this form of stimulation to strengthen the striated urethral muscles 
        and to normalize voiding pattern with activation of afferent fibers of 
        pudendal nerve in the perineal region.
 We have yielded improvement in urinary symptoms 
        of children with MMC applying FES in the present study, which was similar 
        to the results of our previous study in MMC children. In our previous 
        study, we used interferential electrical current to decrease urinary incontinence 
        symptoms in MMC children with bladder overactivity: in which 78% of patients 
        gained continence immediately after treatment and 60% of patients remained 
        continent for 6 months or more (15).
 To our knowledge, there is no report on 
        the efficacy of FES on urinary symptoms in MMC children. There are several 
        studies investigating therapeutic effects of FES on urinary incontinence 
        among adult female subjects.
 Primuse and Kramer reported effects of FES 
        treatment using intravaginal or intra-anal electrodes in 75 patients with 
        complaints of urgency and/or urge incontinence (30 multiple sclerosis 
        and 45 idiopathic patients). In these patients, 59% experienced significant 
        urodynamic and subjective improvement after the treatment and additional 
        40% of the patients had only subjective improvement of urinary symptoms. 
        Therapeutic effects of electrical stimulation remained for at least 2 
        years in 64% of patients with idiopathic urinary incontinence while early 
        symptom relapse occurred 2 months after the treatment in multiple sclerosis 
        group (8).
 In a study by Hung et al., the effect of 
        FES-biofeedback and pelvic floor muscle exercise on symptoms of women 
        with genuine stress urinary incontinence has been investigated. They have 
        reported that the level of discomfort in daily life, social activity, 
        physical activity, and personal relations due to urinary symptoms had 
        significantly improved especially in the FES-biofeedback group (19).
 In a study by Kralj et al., effect of FES 
        on female urinary incontinence has been evaluated. They have reported 
        50.5% cure, 23.4% improvement of symptoms, and 26.1% treatment failure 
        three months after the treatment (20).
 Eskiyurt et al., have compared the effectiveness 
        of two therapeutic method including functional magnetic stimulation (FMS) 
        and functional electrical stimulation (FES) in 22 women with mixed urinary 
        incontinence. Urinary diaries and micturition frequency was more cured 
        and improved in those treated by FES than FMS. However, there was no significant 
        reduction of nocturnal voiding frequency in both groups (21).
 There are several limitations in our present 
        study including small sample size, lack of sham-controlled group, and 
        short duration of follow-up. It will be necessary to design future studies 
        to investigate the role of FES therapy in children with myelomeningocele 
        and compare its effect in a sham-controlled design.
 CONCLUSIONS
       This 
        type of electrical stimulation is an effective and inexpensive therapeutic 
        method for urinary incontinence in children affected by myelomeningocele 
        with no considerable adverse effects and can be used at home. Applying 
        transcutaneous electrodes makes this type of electrical stimulation a 
        less invasive therapeutic method than anal or vaginal electrode and seems 
        to be better tolerated by children. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
  None declared.    REFERENCES 
         Wu HY, 
          Baskin LS, Kogan BA: Neurogenic bladder dysfunction due to myelomeningocele: 
          neonatal versus childhood treatment. J Urol. 1997; 157: 2295-7. Nijman 
          RJ: Neurogenic and non-neurogenic bladder dysfunction. Curr Opin Urol. 
          2001; 11: 577-83. Kajbafzadeh 
          AM, Chubak N: Simultaneous Malone antegrade continent enema and Mitrofanoff 
          principle using the divided appendix: report of a new technique for 
          prevention of stoma complications. J Urol. 2001; 165: 2404-9. Fehrling 
          M, Fall M, Peeker R: Maximal functional electrical stimulation as a 
          single treatment: is it cost-effective? Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2007; 
          41: 132-7. Malm-Buatsi 
          E, Nepple KG, Boyt MA, Austin JC, Cooper CS: Efficacy of transcutaneous 
          electrical nerve stimulation in children with overactive bladder refractory 
          to pharmacotherapy. Urology. 2007; 70: 980-3. Brubaker 
          L: Electrical stimulation in overactive bladder. Urology. 2000; 55(5A 
          Suppl): 17-23; discussion 31-2. Bower 
          WF, Yeung CK: A review of non-invasive electro neuromodulation as an 
          intervention for non-neurogenic bladder dysfunction in children. Neurourol 
          Urodyn. 2004; 23: 63-7. Primus 
          G, Kramer G: Maximal external electrical stimulation for treatment of 
          neurogenic or non-neurogenic urgency and/or urge incontinence. Neurourol 
          Urodyn. 1996; 15: 187-94. Nevéus 
          T, von Gontard A, Hoebeke P, Hjälmås K, Bauer S, Bower W, 
          et al.: The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function 
          in children and adolescents: report from the Standardisation Committee 
          of the International Children’s Continence Society. J Urol. 2006; 
          176: 314-24. Schurch 
          B, Stöhrer M, Kramer G, Schmid DM, Gaul G, Hauri D: Botulinum-A 
          toxin for treating detrusor hyperreflexia in spinal cord injured patients: 
          a new alternative to anticholinergic drugs? Preliminary results. J Urol. 
          2000; 164: 692-7. Swana 
          HS, Sutherland RS, Baskin L: Prenatal intervention for urinary obstruction 
          and myelomeningocele. Int Braz J Urol. 2004; 30: 40-8. Barbosa 
          LL, Liguori R, Ottoni SL, Barroso U Jr, Ortiz V, Macedo A Jr: Is continent 
          urinary diversion feasible in children under five years of age? Int 
          Braz J Urol. 2009; 35: 459-66. Taskinen 
          S, Fagerholm R, Rintala R: Mini-invasive collagen sling in the treatment 
          of urinary incontinence due to sphincteric incompetence. Int Braz J 
          Urol. 2007; 33: 395-400; discussion 400-6. Caldwell 
          KP: The electrical control of sphincter incompetence. Lancet. 1963; 
          2: 174-5. Kajbafzadeh 
          AM, Sharifi-Rad L, Baradaran N, Nejat F: Effect of pelvic floor interferential 
          electrostimulation on urodynamic parameters and incontinency of children 
          with myelomeningocele and detrusor overactivity. Urology. 2009; 74: 
          324-9. Okada 
          N, Igawa Y, Ogawa A, Nishizawa O: Transcutaneous electrical stimulation 
          of thigh muscles in the treatment of detrusor overactivity. Br J Urol. 
          1998; 81: 560-4. Ishigooka 
          M, Hashimoto T, Sasagawa I, Nakada T: Reduction in norepinephrine content 
          of the rabbit urinary bladder by alpha-2 adrenergic antagonist after 
          electrical pelvic floor stimulation. J Urol. 1994; 151: 774-5. Fall 
          M, Lindström S: Electrical stimulation. A physiologic approach 
          to the treatment of urinary incontinence. Urol Clin North Am. 1991; 
          18: 393-407. Sung 
          MS, Hong JY, Choi YH, Baik SH, Yoon H: FES-biofeedback versus intensive 
          pelvic floor muscle exercise for the prevention and treatment of genuine 
          stress incontinence. J Korean Med Sci. 2000; 15: 303-8. Kralj 
          B: Conservative treatment of female stress urinary incontinence with 
          functional electrical stimulation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 
          1999; 85: 53-6. Bölükbas 
          N, Vural M, Karan A, Yalçin O, Eskiyurt N: Effectiveness of functional 
          magnetic versus electrical stimulation in women with urinary incontinence. 
          Eura Medicophys. 2005; 41: 297-301.
 ____________________
 Accepted 
        after revision:
 February 27, 2010
   _______________________Correspondence 
        address:
 Dr. Abdol-Mohammad Kajbafzadeh
 No. 36, 2nd Floor, 7th Street
 Saadat-Abad, Ave.
 Tehran, 1998714616, Iran
 Fax: + 98 21 2206-9451
 E-mail: kajbafzd@sina.tums.ac.ir
 
 EDITORIAL 
        COMMENT  Children 
        with lower urinary tract congenital anomalies such as bladder exstrophy, 
        myelomeningocele, or posterior urethral valves, can develop complex clinical 
        pictures consisting in high-pressure/low flow and hypertonic low compliant 
        bladders (1). These patients often may need surgical treatment (i.e. cystoplasty) 
        as they often develop resistance to drug treatment.In children with myelomeningocele, the main aim of treatment is to improve 
        the functionality of diseased bladders by decreasing the intravesical 
        pressures, improving bladder compliance, urinary and fecal continence 
        and patient’s quality of life. Patients with a poorly compliant 
        bladder may incur renal damage over time and thus an early effective and 
        conservative management of bladder dysfunction is welcome. Surgical treatment 
        may be effective, but side effects are not negligible: bladder augmentation 
        is usually done with gastrointestinal segments, which can lead to metabolic 
        abnormalities such as acidosis or alkalosis, depending on the segment 
        used, an increased rate of calculi formation, increased mucus production, 
        and enhanced risk of malignant disease (2,3).
 Kajbafzadeh and colleagues in this issue of International Brazil Journal 
        of Urology investigated the efficacy of transcutaneous functional electrical 
        stimulation (FES) in a small group of children with myelomeningocele and 
        lower urinary tract dysfunction. Over 12 patients, 9 children reported 
        an improvement on urinary incontinence score, although three children 
        had no improvement. It is interesting to note that the detrusor leak point 
        pressure was significantly improved as well as the maximum bladder capacity. 
        Authors concluded that FES therapy might have positive effects on improvement 
        of voiding symptoms of children with neurogenic urinary incontinence in 
        terms of daily incontinence score and urodynamic parameters.
 Every conservative strategy to improve lower urinary dysfunction of children 
        with neurogenic bladder is welcome, but long-term multiparametric (objective 
        and subjective) follow-up remains the challenge for next generation of 
        pediatric and adult urologists.
 REFERENCES 
         Snodgrass 
          WT, Adams R: Initial urologic management of myelomeningocele. Urol Clin 
          North Am. 2004; 31: 427-34. McDougal 
          WS: Metabolic complications of urinary intestinal diversion. J Urol. 
          1992; 147: 1199-208. Soergel 
          TM, Cain MP, Misseri R, Gardner TA, Koch MO, Rink RC: Transitional cell 
          carcinoma of the bladder following augmentation cystoplasty for the 
          neuropathic bladder. J Urol. 2004; 172: 1649-51; discussion 1651-2. Dr. 
        Massimo LazzeriDepartment of Urology
 San Raffaele Hospital
 Vita-Salute University San Raffaele Turro
 Milan, Italy
 
 |